Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Kobe Bryant Will Never Top Michael Jordan

Indiana Pacers 108, New Jersey Nets 94: Pacers Break Out of Shooting Slump Behind Five Paul George Three Pointers

Coach Frank Vogel was pleased enough with the effort tonight that he came out and said it: "We're unbeatable when we share the ball." Certainly, there was enough proof in the Pacers' play in their 108-94 win over the New Jersey Nets to make it seem like it might just be true. Of course, by this point, it's hard to not take Vogel's words as pure fact. Not only does he have the players buying into his philosophy, but it's been carrying over to Pacers fans as well, where proclamations of invincibility feel completely credible.

After all, it was ball movement that helped Indiana get their fourth win in five games, halt their losing side at one game, and effectively cruise to victory despite getting outhustled and subsequently killed by the Nets on the offensive glass. The Pacers as a team had 26 assists on 41 field goals, with ten of the eleven players registering one. The 41 field goals are, as no surprise, a season high, as the Pacers broke out of their sub-40% shooting woes to rack up a solid 53% effort, which included 13 three pointers.

The Pacers led the whole way in Newark, which began on a 6-0 run to start the night. It's feels conflicting to say the Pacers actually played well. Without a doubt, they had their best (really first) offensive game of the year, and a solid defensive effort that, despite a few shortcomings, helped to cloud over the fact they were largely outplayed by the Nets. New Jersey, short not only Brook Lopez, but also Kris Humphries, were severely shorthanded, but had big hustle all night.

Indiana simply looked like the better team, because while New Jersey hung around, the feeling never really crept up that the game was in serious jeopardy for the Pacers. The Nets crashed the boards, getting 20 on the offensive glass, forced the Pacers into 15 turnovers, had a heyday in the defensive paint blocking what felt like everything going up, and outshot them at the free throw line by 8 points. But Indiana's ball movement, including lights out play by Paul George, really helped fuel this game to what was felt like an easy victory late in the fourth quarter.

Is that the state of mind in expectations? Knowing what the Nets were short, knowing what the Pacers had going once the game got underway...it just seemed like if Indiana ever found themselves in trouble, they'd have pulled the win out. In a good way, not in the squeak by in overtime to Cleveland sort of way. In fact, the team just felt different tonight. After the egg that was laid in Detroit, this felt like just the game they needed to have to ease worried minds; to keep alive, at least for now, the thought that this team really is turning the corner.

After the jump, more on a successful Frank Vogel homecoming:

Star-divide

  • Paul George led the way with 21 points for the Pacers, but did so on just 10 field goal attempts, shooting a ridiculous 80% and 5-5 from three point range. The 21 is a season high, two short of his career high, but most importantly, it was great to see him bounce back in a big way after a pair of dud games. Having inconsistencies should be expected from the young George, but it's big to know he can break out of slumps without a lengthy stretch of bad play.
  • David West was a big piece to the puzzle early on, showcasing his patented jump shot, putting up an effortless 15 points in just 23 minutes. In fact, minutes were limited across the board tonight; either from Vogel's feeling the second unit could handle business and close the game out or a wish to put a rested squad on the floor in Miami on Wednesday, but Roy Hibbert and Darren Collison barely got over 20 minutes themselves, both having solid games with big blocks and big steals to go with nice play for their teammates.
  • Guys shooting numbers went up tonight, that is except for Danny Granger. Granger finished with 15 points and 6 boards on 3-7 shooting from downtown, but went just 1-7 inside the arc. Granger's play inside the paint this year has been impressive, but stout play inside by the Nets really limited Danny's effectiveness. This led to a lot of bad shots being put up by Granger. The 1-7 shooting certainly was not a result of misfortune.
  • Rookie Marshon Brooks, a popular player with Pacers fans around the time of the draft, had a solid game for the Nets. When not beating Dahntay Jones (who himself had a nice offensive night with 11 points on 5-6 shooting), the rook was making big plays finishing with 21 points and 7 boards off of the bench. While he seems to be shot happy, he's certainly a big spark for the Nets, a team that needs the punch Brooks brings.
  • The Pacers played well defensively, but they were too anxious. While they were good on first shots, they were bad at blocking out and anticipating the miss and securing the rebound. Their inability to keep the Nets off the glass led to 16 second chance points for New Jersey, a number that will be twice as high on the same number of rebounds if they don't do better against the Heat.

It felt good to win, and not have to win (as) ugly, but there is certainly room for improvement when it comes to ball control and offensive rebounds. Indiana's 4-1 record in the opening stretch isn't a surprise, but it's good to know the Pacers kept their part of the deal in the win-loss column before the schedule stiffens up. The first true measuring stick game for the blue and gold will come up against the previously unbeaten Miami Heat on Wednesday. The Heat will be in vengeance mode following a fourth quarter collapse which gave them their first loss at home against the Hawks tonight, making an already tough game potentially even tougher.

Comment 23 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Remember when D. Jones could play defense? He is about useless.

My Blog on lifting, movies, fish, and some mma: www.themindofshadow.blogspot.com

by dbcb on Jan 2, 2012 11:13 PM EST reply actions  

and...

he had one of his better games against the Nets…the guy is a decent finisher on the break and a serviceable defender against the right opponent…but watching him jack up one-on-one bad shots all night is just brutal

by knuman on Jan 3, 2012 5:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Fail!

I predicted the Nets would win this one b/c of the poor shooting and the bitter feeling I had after loosing to the woeful Pistons Saturday. Man, was I utterly surprised to tune in in the 3rd qrt and shots were falling. 1 game at a time and we may be avg 102pts with keeping our 2nd best points allowed at 87 before FEB with a shooting avg of 45%+. Hell, who knows, we may make a trade of Granger/Jones for M.Ellis.

***Forever Grunge...Man!***
*I'm Alive* Eddie Veddar, Pearl Jam

by rockguyinindy on Jan 2, 2012 11:27 PM EST reply actions  

I still firmly believe that once Danny buys into the team concept, he’ll be a much more dangerous player. Dangerous being the extra passes he’ll start making. He has four years worth of bad habits, but he also has four years worth of reputation. When he gets into the paint, which he’s shown he can do, he draws double- and triple-teams. That’s not the sort of player you give up.

by Jmahoney on Jan 2, 2012 11:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Granger has to go.

I have seen enough of him this year to realize we are better off without him, I think it would be addition by subtraction. He is a one dimensional player who can only shot and he’s not even good at that. Ever since he made the all-star team a couple years ago he has gotten progressively worse. Between him and Hansbrough I don’t think they have a total of five assist, we only need one black hole and I would rather have Tyler. If we could trade him for a solid two guard and a backup big I would be more than happy, PG is ready to blow up get this man some more looks.

by EliB209 on Jan 3, 2012 12:36 AM EST up reply actions  

hahahaha

5 games in a shortened lockout season (with a shortened training camp, i might add) is enough to know that we are better off without him, our best player for the past 3-4 years? the 30 teams in the NBA must be fools for not hiring you as the GM, seeing as how you can properly evaluate players in such a short time.

Harper's on Miller, McKey, gets in to Miller for the win and...

CHIEF

by wonillionaire on Jan 3, 2012 1:11 AM EST up reply actions  

Thanks for the complement. Danny is a great player for a bad team, he still thinks we need him to take 20 plus shots a game because we have no one who can score. If you watch the team play with him on the bench there is much better ball movement and the team gets much better shots. Sorry but the man had a terrible season last year and he is off to the same kind of start this year. With a much improved team he needs to move the ball more and not look for his offense as much shots will come his way.

Maybe its a bit premature to say he need to go but he definitely needs to change the way he plays because he will do nothing but hold the team back if he continues to play this way.

by EliB209 on Jan 3, 2012 1:34 AM EST up reply actions  

You don't dump a player who has been your leader for years

just because he has had a few poor nights. I’d be like if Peyton Manning ended up being healthy for next season, his first game he played poorly, and the Colts cut him because “he has gotten progressively worse.”

Granger should not go. He isn’t that old, he is relatively inexpensive, and the Pacers are building by being consistent and having a strong core that just keeps on getting better. The only way Granger should leave this team at all is if the Pacers could get a huge haul for him, and I don’t see that happening. I can almost guarantee that short of him getting a big pay day in free agency, Danny is staying a Pacer for a long time.

I am a college student that sleeps with a St. Louis Cardinals Fredbird Pillow Pet, and I am proud of it.

by Sir Sci on Jan 3, 2012 1:29 AM EST up reply actions  

First of all Payton is on a different level than Granger, one is arguably the best QB of all time and the other is a one time all-star. But you make some great points its just frustrating watching him jack up shots all game and not trying to get others involved. I would like too see the offense go inside out as we have two good low post scorers.

by EliB209 on Jan 3, 2012 1:39 AM EST up reply actions  

His SHOTS aren't that bad

They’re not all great, not saying that, had a bad iso in the 1st, a quick 3 in I think the 3rd, but it’s not the SELECTION I have a problem with for the most part, it’s just getting the shots to fall, especially the dribble drives. Danny’s always started slow and been predominately a catch and shoot guy, I don’t know why people are all of a sudden acting like he’s chucking NOW, he’s got better shot selection in this small sample season than he’s had in at least 3 years. I don’t know if people expect a 28 year old jumpshooter to completely change his game overnight or what, people have been screaming for him to drive more and he’s been doing it plenty but since that’s a major (REALLY major) adjustment, shocker, it’s a tough transition. And he’s playing D again, but who cares, right?

He’s in a funk slump cold streak early season lockout short camp short preseason thing with a new low post option and two more that may as well be knew the way Vogel’s redesigned the offense and their gained experience that makes them more viable options. The fickleness and just complete lack of patience with him is honestly pretty disheartening. Go ahead and dump Danny, see how quick our frontline gets collapsed on and the entire offense goes to (even more) shit.

Sup Jello Shot?

by IndyPacers on Jan 3, 2012 6:04 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Thank you.

"A champion is someone who gets up when he can't."
- Jack Dempsey

by infinityzero.systemerror on Jan 3, 2012 6:16 AM EST up reply actions  

really good points...

Granger had no choice but to be the man on a bad Pacers team for years, but to be honest he’s best served as an outside shooting role player who can be occasionally more when he is feeling it. He has been hitting big shots for the team this year when required, so we should cut him some slack, but this kind of poor shooting cannot continue, especially when there are more efficient scorers on the team now.

by knuman on Jan 3, 2012 5:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Guys~

I was being sarcastic about trading Granger for Ellis. He’s having a slump it seems but I’m not ready to see him walk the plank. Remember, he has been the man…The ONLY man, for the past 4 yrs. Now he has more “Men” around him and a “FREAK” who will demand more eventually…that would be P.George.

***Forever Grunge...Man!***
*I'm Alive* Eddie Veddar, Pearl Jam

by rockguyinindy on Jan 3, 2012 9:25 AM EST up reply actions  

bahahahaha

This is what the nets coach said after the game

“They really were stroking the ball pretty good. We put out some fires, and then another one erupted.”
-Nets Coach Avery Johnson

We never really grow up, we only learn how to act in public.

Always remember that you're unique, just like everybody else

Don't tell me the sky is the limit when there are footprints on the moon!

by DrMustache on Jan 3, 2012 1:36 AM EST reply actions  

Sweet

Thats how I like the Pacers to be…Come at you in waves

***Forever Grunge...Man!***
*I'm Alive* Eddie Veddar, Pearl Jam

by rockguyinindy on Jan 3, 2012 9:27 AM EST up reply actions  

Here we go again.....

with the Granger trade talks. Granger has hit some big shots already this season and his defense looks better. He sealed the overtime win the other night. Granger will get accustomed to his new role(extra pass) like the rest of the team. PATIENCE. It’s earlier and we’ll see ups and downs from players (example Paul George last night had a rough 1st half then bounced back). I wish you people would stop throwing Danny under the bus. If this was 1995 you’d be talking Reggie Miller for Jamal Mashburn trades. Granger for Ellis…um, hi…no.

by Shrilly Ray on Jan 3, 2012 10:00 AM EST reply actions  

Marshon Brooks...

was my favorite player coming out of this previous draft and he is all I thought he would be in the NBA in his first yr. Just think what he can do with a couple more years. I still say we will regret not picking him in the draft. He can do everything that Hill can do with an extra 3 in in height. Now we will have to contend with having to try to not only re-sign him but also Big Roy. I like Hill but we just wasted a picks for a rental player. I hope Gordon will prove that he can stay heathly to be signed for big bucks by the Pacers though.

by HoosierGM on Jan 3, 2012 2:44 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Indiana Pacers. Email: indycornrows@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

D_oh_small
Question for Cornrowers...not Heat vs. Pacers related.

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Miami Heat are the Perfect Example as to Why Fans Should Boycott the NBA
Small
PACER PRIDE???
Bcampheadshot2_small
On Flagrant Fouls and Soft Play
Small
Game 5
1565007530_small
Devil's Take - Pacers dry up, Heat steal one
Small
Wade aging quickly and gracelessly - Bill Reiter, Foxsports
Small
How to improve on game 3
Small
Colin Cowherd- TOTALLY DISRESPECTED THE PACERS, THE CITY AND OUR FANS!!!!!!!!!! (NOT RIGHT)
1565007530_small
Devil's Take - Swagger On, Heat Off
Imagescaphwx17_small
Confusion??

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

Iclogo_new_small Tom Lewis

Editor

Core_small Nathan S.

Authors

The_outside_world_small Ian Levy

Small Glenn A.