Indiana Pacers 97, Boston Celtics 83: Pacers Ride Defensive Effort to Stay Perfect at Home
It felt like the Pacers were shooting lights out.
They only shot 37%? Well, okay, it seemed like there was exceptional ball movement.
What? They had just 14 assists on 35 FGs? Was it good three point shooting? No? A showcase of exceptional bench play? The bench had just 22 points! A couple of guys getting hot? Darren Collison was the only Pacer over 50% shooting, though.
Then what was it? How did the Pacers cruise to a decisive 97-83 victory to improve to 9-3 overall and a perfect 5-0 at home?
Defense?
The Pacers play defense?
Sure enough, the Pacers overcame numerous offensive deficiencies tonight with a masterful defensive effort that kept the Celtics under 40% shooting, forced 18 turnovers, had 12 steals, and another 10 blocks. It's hard to believe given this franchise's recent struggles defensively that the smash mouth mantra Frank the Tank has wanted to instill on this team seems to be paying off, to the point where the Pacers entered the game 3rd in points allowed and 4th in field goal defense, with another effort that will only improve those numbers.
Even still, it's fair enough to believe the great play of the Pacers came on both sides of the ball because it was such a fun game to watch. The eye test showed a team that was cohesive, well balanced, and looked rested (well, Danny Granger was rested) even if the box score suggested it was a bit of a sloppy offensive performance. But the Pacers won the turnover battle, had over 52 rebounds (20 on the offensive glass), had 42 of their 97 points in the paint, and dominated the Celtics 23-9 in second chance points.
Sentimentally, a second double digit win over the Celtics feels like it's an important statement for the Pacers to make, but realistically, Indiana beat a team that has struggled to even compete with anyone that has had a pulse and has been sent into a four game losing streak that began against the Pacers. Regardless, the fashion in which the Pacers won, a lot of the time even dominated, is where the statement should be.
Neither team showed the ability to run away early, with numerous lead changes keeping the game within two possessions before Indiana responded to a 7-0 Celtics run with a 12-0 run of their own that would put Indiana up for good. The interesting thing with the flow of the game wasn't so much the importance of that 12-0 run, but that the Pacers were ready for a response the rest of the night. At no point in the rest of the second and third quarters did the Pacers let up more than four consecutive points to Boston, something Boston was only able to achieve twice.
As Boston fought to keep the game within striking distance, it was the Pacers that were there with a response every single time. Great defense kept Boston in check, timely offense made Celtic responses moot. The game felt mostly comfortable even sitting just around 10 points, until the Pacers put the game on ice with a 9-0 run late in the second half of the third quarter, putting Indiana up 18, holding Boston scoreless over five minutes, forcing ten consecutive misses.
The fourth quarter was filled with the Pacers valiantly putting forth the effort to drop their shooting percentage under 40% yet again, so let's not harp so much on that, but the word of the game was defense, maybe mixed a bit with teamwork to create a weird hybrid word like teamfence or dework.
After the jump, the Pacers continue to hold serve at home:
- Roy Hibbert had a rough shooting night, but it didn't really feel like it. Though he finished 5-15 from the field, he had another near-double double of 11 points and 9 rebounds. He was a big part of the gameplan early, forcing inside against Jermaine O'Neal, who did a solid job on him when you look at the numbers. Defensively, Hibbert had an impressive game, being a thorn in the paint, even sending Kevin Garnett packing in a block Roy told KG to kindly "Get outta here," short a choice word or two.
- The first quarter was also helped along by Paul George, who had 9 points in the first quarter en route to a 17 point game. All things considered it was a positive night for Paul, who not only did a far better job tonight in containing Ray Allen, but forced Doc Rivers to sit Allen in the first when George had it going. George also ended up with a pair of steals, a block, and 8 boards to go alongside his nice offensive night. Despite some suspect decision making, and an almost Danny Granger-esque fear of dunking in fast break opportunities. But if you can gripe about George scoring points on layups rather than dunks, more power to George.
- Danny Granger made the most of his second half off last night by leading the Pacers in scoring with 21 points on 8-19 shooting. Interestingly enough, the somewhat okay shooting performance didn't come from outside the arc, but rather from within, a notable contrast given the season to date. Granger was just 1-6 from three point range (his lonely three pointer in the third quarter the 9-0 run that effectively hammered home the win), putting him at 7-13 inside the arc. Add in another solid defensive effort, and it appears maybe Granger could be rounding into form.
- As mentioned earlier, the bench combined for just 22 points, but it's not as if they played terribly. George Hill splashed a pair of threes and had a pretty big 8 points, even spending some productive minutes at the point. Lance Stephenson abused Avery Bradley, Jeff Foster took 6 FGA, and Jeff Pendergraph scored his first points with the team. Tyler Hansbrough had a rough night, either still adjusting to the glasses, not getting any love from the referees, or feeling the ill effects of his Tar Heels getting destroyed by Florida State. Whatever the cause, he was as vocal and frustrated as he's been in his time with the blue and gold, a sign that would be positive if he weren't having such a bad night and didn't feel like he was walking the technical line every time he opened his mouth.
The Pacers are off until Wednesday, an eternal wait in this breakneck season, but much deserved break for the blue and gold who continue to make the most of their limited home court chances in the early parts of the season. When they emerge in four days, it will be in Sacramento, California for the first of three road games to face the Kings. It's their lone West Coast swing of the year, in a stretch that will include 8 road games in their next 10, including games in Chicago, Boston, Orlando, Los Angeles (to face the Lakers), and Dallas. Where the Pacers sit in ten games will remain to be seen, but for now, at 9-3 and tied for second in the East, Indiana has lived up to nearly all of the expectations heading into the season, with plenty of opportunities for growth.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Just looked at the all-star votes, how is it that we are tied for the most players on the ballot with 6 and not one player with more than 20,000 votes. What a joke they should let coaches vote and not a bunch of idiot fans.
I think you answered you're own question.
Is anyone on the team even scoring more than 15ppg? There’s no All-stars on this team. You’d have to be pretty freaking homerish to think there are.
That’s what’s so great about our team and fun to watch. There’s always going to be 3 or 4 players on our team having a good night and we can win games even when a couple are having a bad night.
peac.e
by trucutter on Jan 15, 2012 12:02 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Exactly Man!!!!
***Forever Grunge...Man!***
*I'm Alive* Eddie Veddar, Pearl Jam
by rockguyinindy on Jan 15, 2012 12:07 AM EST up reply actions
Disagree/Agree
I agree wholeheartedly with Eli here…for the backup East center to be Joakim Noah….a 7 and 7 guy and not Hibbert is idiotic….let the coaches, players, team personal, and media partake in the vote. Would be much fairer and you wouldnt have your Yao and T-Macs making the game despite only playing a handful of games. Idiotic. I do disagree that there are no all-stars on this team. Because I believe there are a few I would love to see make it; DC, Hibbert being two of them.
JP Sinclair
The fans only vote for the starters
that said, I bet Noah is a likely candidate to be Howard’s backup on the squad. His strength is defense, so 7 and 7 doesn’t represent his total game. Hibbert is making a name for himself, and after Howard might be the best 2 way center in the East, especially now that Horford is out. If he keeps doing what he has been, they’ll definitely be talking about him as a potential all star candidate.
Yeah...that's what I thought.
With Hibbert emerging, Horford out, Noah struggling a bit…I think there’s only a couple guys that can challenge Hibbert for that spot. Tyson Chandler is too one dimensional (no scoring, especially with his role on that team). Javel McGee would probably be a strong candidate also, IF his team wasn’t so terrible and there wasn’t a pretty glarring lack of basketball IQ. I actually think Verajao isn’t scoring enough and Greg Monroe isn’t defending well enough and their teams aren’t winning enough.
I think that backup Center spot is Roy’s to lose….unless they can give it Bosh, then he might be in trouble. Even though I don’t think it takes making the all-star team to catch GM’s attention…I’d almost rather Roy wait till next year so his agent won’t have that barganing chip in extension talks.
peac.e
No MORE RANTS
OK Guys…I’m getting into the “WINNING UGLY” philosophy. It seems that we lost these kind of close grinding games the last few seasons. I was into the Winning Ugly back in the day of the Davis’ and Reggie along with Bird coaching.
Realy, what I see this season is a mirror image of the Boston Celtics a few yrs back when they began the Big 3 idea. I am giving up that Danny will avg 18, West avg 16 blah, blah,blah. I’ll take our main guys avg 12-14 if it means we win and win and win. Ugly or Pretty. Sorry for my Negativity the past few games and hope to keep it at a minimum when we get beat. Win Ugly Forever!!!
***Forever Grunge...Man!***
*I'm Alive* Eddie Veddar, Pearl Jam
Defense is what defines the best teams in the league.
I think we’re on the right track.
"A champion is someone who gets up when he can't."
- Jack Dempsey
by infinityzero.systemerror on Jan 15, 2012 12:27 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
It's certainly what won Boston their championship a few years ago.
No one on their team averaged 20 points per game because they distributed the ball to several different guys. Coupled with the number one defense in the league, they were a force. We look a lot like they did, and that’s fine with me.
allstar voting
Who cares? The league wants the fans involved in the process. I for one prefer the NBA model over the NFL. The fans only get a partial vote in the NFL but yet the same guys go every year. Just ask Pat Angerer for the colts.
by GrangerSCK33 on Jan 15, 2012 12:43 AM EST via mobile reply actions
I like Pat....but I think there's a better example....
London Fletcher finally made his first…but only b/c Urlacher was injured.
peac.e
Yeah, the Angerer argument still pisses me off.
Because he played for a two-win team he can’t be an all-star, despite leading the league in total tackles for the majority of the season. It’s complete and total crap.
with the condensed season and projected playoff appearance,
i would much rather have our guys rest on all star weekend. they should take whatever rest they can get.
i sound like a father. oh, wait….i think i am.
I'd like them to make it
But have an “injury” that requires three days rest, so they get the kudos, and (most of) the rest. I do think Hibbert is the pacers most likely all star due to exceptional balance
by NZ Buc on Jan 15, 2012 3:42 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
No need All star
we shud use that break to stay fresh for the 2nd half of the season
Great game, but...
… Paul George dropped to 4th in the league in 3pt FG%. Is it too early to panic?
I think 2 of his misses were when the shot clock almost expired. :(
We need to speed up our plays. Hans also gets put into bad position with the shot clock winding down.
If only we could practice more….
And it's now my sig
by Bronn on May 17, 2011 4:56 PM EDT
Eh...I don't know about Hans.
Maybe there’s a few times when he gets the ball in a bad spot late in the clock.
But he also get’s the ball where he wants it with plenty of time and dribbles into a double/triple team and takes a horrible shot way more than he should.
His New years resolution of, “I will never, EVER pass the ball when I get it.” is not working very well.
Maybe he needs a “NEW” new years resolution.
peac.e



























