Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Events Cause Mariners To Lose To Rangers

Indiana Pacers 95, Toronto Raptors 90: Indiana Claws to Road Victory After Sluggish Start

Though it was George Hill who led the way for the Indiana Pacers with 22 points, David West's name came up a lot down the stretch. West's play helped seal the win for Indiana the last time they played the Raptors in Toronto, and his 7 points in the final six minutes kept the Pacers in a see-saw game as the game wound down.

The Pacers, tied with under 20 seconds to go, sent West to the free throw line where he would hit the first and miss the second, but a fortuitous offensive board from Tyler Hansbrough helped put Indiana up 3. Toronto with the ball, and the chance to play for overtime, barely got in bounds before West committed what seemed like a curious foul on Jamaal Magloire to put him at the line for two. Magloire, 2-9 on the year from the line, and 1-2 on the night, proceeded to air ball his first free throw, making an eyebrow raising move into a veteran savvy one.

Indiana not only took advantage of the free throw line, finishing 32-38 on the night, but were aided by Toronto missing their final four from the charity stripe, as they stumbled at just 20-32. But that the game was even in position to be won by the Pacers sure seems like a small miracle given how the game began. The Raptors, not only short Andrea Bargnani, but Jerryd Bayless as well, made no excuses as they stormed out to an 11-2 lead, that ballooned to 13 later in the first and 16 points at the halfway point of the second quarter.

Toronto was shooting above 60%; Indiana, below 30%. The Pacers weren't moving the ball much, if at all, on possessions, settling for the one on one play they should know hasn't (and won't) give them success at any point. But the Pacers, trailing 40-24, rattled off a 14-2 capped by Danny Granger to pull them within four. Then, with the half closing out, Granger followed a big block on Ed Davis by hovering over Davis, an act that warranted him a technical foul, which happened to be his second, tossing him from the game.

Despite being short one of their best pieces, the Pacers continued to fight back, riding Roy Hibbert's post play early in the third quarter. As the third quarter progressed, Indiana struggled to get over the three point wall, eventually letting up a 9-2 Toronto run that pushed the Raptor lead to double figures. Indiana responded with a 9-1 run of their own, eventually Paul George getting the basket to tie the game up at 65 with the third quarter winding down.

The fourth quarter turned into a back and forth affair with neither team pulling ahead by more than two points. George Hill was huge at this point in the game, scoring 7 of his 22 in the first half of the quarter, helping to lead the Pacers to an always good road victory. It may have been ugly, but it looks pretty in the standings, as Indiana improves to 8-3 on the year.

After the jump, more on a gutsy road victory:

Star-divide

  • George Hill not only led the way in scoring for the Pacers with 22 points, tacking on 5 steals, but did so on just 11 shots. When the team looked to be going through the motions, Hill was the one playing. When ball movement stopped, Hill was the one who bailed them out. His play not only helped the team through some rough patches, but helped the team in getting them into the lead when the game was a see-saw affair in the fourth quarter.
  • Roy Hibbert had another quiet 15 points and 9 rebounds. Five of his boards were on the offensive glass, important given Indiana's struggles shooting early. Four of those rebounds led to 9 second chance points, six by Hibbert himself. For David West to help close the game out was important, not only to secure the win, but because Roy fouling out could've set the Pacers up in a rough situation had the game gone an extra period.
  • The Pacers were plagued by bad play early in the game, to the tune of 10 turnovers early in the second quarter. But they cleaned up their game and had just 6 for the rest of the game, while forcing Toronto into turnovers, eventually winning the turnover battle. Despite the rough start, Indiana fought back and won even category aside from assists. While Toronto dominated the first 18 minutes, the Pacers showcased a tremendous turnaround, one they've come across at times this season; one they shouldn't look to become reliant on, especially as tougher competition shows up.

All in all, Indiana's win borderlines surreal given all the negative action that took place early, but not deterred by the ejection of Danny Granger, they zeroed in and were able to snatch a victory they may not have deserved on the road. The Pacers' 8-3 record keeps them with the upper echelon teams in the Eastern Conference, though with some underachieving competition (the team has had just three games against above .500 teams), they still have a lot to prove.

So even though the Boston Celtics sit at 4-6 and on a three game losing streak that began at home against the Pacers, they are still a challenge for the young Indiana squad, who will host those Celtics Saturday night at Bankers Life Fieldhouse. The Pacers, sitting at 4-0 at home, are in no position to give away any home games early in the season with just three more home games in January.

Comment 19 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I guess another positive would be

the fact that Granger will be well rested for a back to back playing the celtics and to also have a fresh foster in the mix too…This team is starting to get better and grow with every game they play…Its a fun time to be a pacer fan

by supercolts on Jan 13, 2012 11:15 PM EST reply actions  

Another positive....

…is that MAYBE Danny will get back on the break after he blocks someone so hard that they are out of the following play for 2-3 seconds instead of wasting that window by acting like someone he’s not and getting T’d out of the game.

The way Granger was back to forcing some bad shots….and the way that only Hansbrough and maybe Lance (only a couple times) were the only Pacers that forced bad shots the rest of the game…we might not have won with Danny on the floor in the 3rd and 4th.

peac.e

by trucutter on Jan 14, 2012 1:04 AM EST up reply actions  

I guess I was refering to the up-and-down....

…double dribble he got called for at the top of the key.

All in all….call me crazy…I was more impressed with Lance tonight than against Atlanta.

Defense was much better…I’d even call it “very good” and he passed early in the clock rather than putting his head down and taking tough shots when we didn’t yet need forced shots. Now those went in for him against Atlanta, but he hasn’t proven that he’s earned those kind of contested out of rhythm looks like a few of the ones he took against Atlanta….so….

I’m continuing to be cautiously optimistic.

peac.e

by trucutter on Jan 14, 2012 1:20 AM EST up reply actions  

I love him

One thing that I think would help him out and our team is that when George returns to play the 3, while Danny is still resting or in the locker room because of two techs, have A.J. and Lance playing at the same time or A.J. and HIll or Lance and Hill and keep Dhantay seated next to Pender – we should’ve signed Brandan Wright – graph.

I could easily be wrong, but that seems like a small change that would make a big difference in terms of increased ball movement for our second unit.

by pendulum55 on Jan 14, 2012 1:23 AM EST up reply actions  

I actually think we need the mentality that Jones and Lance have...

…coming off the bench. That, “Give me the ball and I’m going to score.” kind of mentality. Unfotunately, as much as I think Jones, for his defense, and Lance, for his potential are nice assets….they don’t have the ability to go along with that mentality.

They are more like Matt Hasselbeck. Give me the ball and I’m going to score….ooops turnover!

Actually, I still like Jones and think he’s a solid asset for the salary. And I think Lance has the potential to grow into that dominant, non-team player that we need off the bench. I just wish we could’ve signed him for 3 or 4 years at around the same price. I’m afraid he’s going to get just enough minutes to garner competition in the free agent market and we are going to have to pay to much for a guy who will still need some development to warrant the next salary he will be making.

peac.e

by trucutter on Jan 14, 2012 1:57 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't like the rule.

It was called correctly according to the rules, but I feel that if a ‘superstar’ does that same exact thing, the refs would have ignored it.

Ugly game throughout. I’m happy we won but that game shouldn’t have even been close.

"A champion is someone who gets up when he can't."
- Jack Dempsey

by infinityzero.systemerror on Jan 13, 2012 11:15 PM EST reply actions  

Assuming you are refering to the Danny T???

That’s the rule. I’m so glad they called that on him too.

Nice block Danny. Now STFU and get back on the break. The uncalled for “taunting” wasn’t my issue. The second he spent talking sh!t instead of running down the lane on a play that was gauranteed to be no worse than a 5-on-4….just shut up Danny and keep playing.

Your defense has been very impressive this year…against scrubs…against Miami, it was…well…not many people can gaurd Lebron. So, shut your mouth and go take another terrible forced shot against a double team on a fast break with 2 or 3 wide open teammates trailing.

peac.e

by trucutter on Jan 14, 2012 1:15 AM EST up reply actions  

didn't Paul guard Lebron?

and Pierce is a scrub these days?

www.themindofshadow.blogspot.com/

by dbcb on Jan 14, 2012 9:12 AM EST up reply actions  

The amount of fouls called/committed was mind numbing

Made for an ugly game, redeemed only by the fact that we won.

by pendulum55 on Jan 13, 2012 11:40 PM EST reply actions  

Totally PATHETIC!

NO, Im not ranting this time. I think I rest my case. Love the Pacers but really y’all….something is missing. I see Philly, Atlanta and teams of our supposed caliber beat the everlasting shit outta of the teams they need to beat. And the Pacers…barely…I mean by the grace of Tyler and Hill BARELY win against a woeful Raptors team that was short 2 of they’re productive players in Bargnani and Bayless already out. Yeah, Sure whatever man, Im happy we are 8-3 in the 1st 11 games and I’ll take it. I didnt even see the game…my GF kept texting me the score and I was SHOCKED we werent up by 25 at halftime. Sounds like the pacers went in “Take it Easy mode” AGAIN. This is becoming habitual..Eeking out a win against a bunch of scrubs and yes the Raps are a bunch of scrubs next to Washington. I’ll say it again..We are missing something, another scorer off the bench to back up Granger/George along with Hill & Tyler??? Or freeking make a trade for a Nick stinkin Young, Courtney Lee or hell, even get that cat Laresa from the frickin Mad Ants…he might be a descent surprise at 6-8, 230lbs. I hear good things about him. Go ahead, look at the some of the box scores tonight or last night and see wtf Philly is doing to the basement teams, or Atlanta, New York (UGH). Still PROUD to wear my Pacer gear with pride but “Cmon Man”!!!! This is getting rediculous.

***Forever Grunge...Man!***
*I'm Alive* Eddie Veddar, Pearl Jam

by rockguyinindy on Jan 14, 2012 12:49 AM EST reply actions  

Don't rant about an ugly....

…if you didn’t watch it.

It wasn’t a matter of ‘taking it easy’. We got off to a slow start b/c the Pacers weren’t doing what they’ve done during their good stretches in moving the ball and playing disciplined defense. If anything, they weren’t taking it easy enough early. We were almost DOWN 25 at half time.

I’ll admit, we are missing a few things. But this isn’t a product of this team taking it easy…it’s forcing things too much.

Also, the Raptors were playing better, and hitting shots at a rate early in the game that isn’t who they really are (minus Bargniani anyway).

Don’t trip. The Pacers are a good team. I don’t think they’ll make it out of the 2nd round and there’s not gaurantee they’ll make it to the 2nd round. But, Nick Young and Courtney Lee are not the answer….not at all.

peac.e

by trucutter on Jan 14, 2012 1:10 AM EST up reply actions  

I

Was simply throwing out anybody more than Jones and Lance….at least a half way SF or wing player. I KNOW I trip easy this season a hell of a lot more in the past b/c of this teams expectations and savvyness (which I dont see yet). I look at the Bulls, Thunder, 6ers, Orlando, NY, Portland, Clippers and see that they are pounding the Toronto’s, Washingtons of the league and we havent done that at all except Charlotte, Atlanta which was missing 2-3 players plus an all star Horford. I KNOW I’m not the only one seeing that this team is missing something or like you said, trying to force too much. MAYBE thats simply what I’m missing: They’re simply Forcing Too Much. Oh well, enough being negative…Gotta love the Pacers and heres hoping for a Celts a$$ whippin tomorrow.
Heres hoping by the 30th game they will be avg 46% shooting, 3rd best defense, #4 Rebounding, a Top 3 point shooting team and the top 4 bench in the NBA.
I am convinced Hill is moving in the right direction as well as Roy and Tyler, but God Bless it! Granger and West need to step the hell up.

***Forever Grunge...Man!***
*I'm Alive* Eddie Veddar, Pearl Jam

by rockguyinindy on Jan 14, 2012 1:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Not Ranting

Just Hoping

***Forever Grunge...Man!***
*I'm Alive* Eddie Veddar, Pearl Jam

by rockguyinindy on Jan 14, 2012 1:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed....

…in that West and Granger need to step up. West I think has much more of an excuse than Danny. Danny has some excuses too. He’s never had the luxury of having many guys worth passing to, nor the presure of the expectation to win. For the most part he’s been able to go out and just play his game and hope that the team wins without thinking what kind of disciplin it will take to win.

All those teams you named have at least one elite player. We don’t. The closest team to ours that you mentioned is probably the 76ers. They have a player in Iggy that’s probably a smidge better than anyone we have. Otherwise, they have alot of similar pieces. And you see that we hung right with them despite being on the road and missing Hill and Granger.

Keep your hopes up. Root for the Pacers. But keep in mind, that they need to execute a near perfect game to keep pace with the top teams in the league and they haven’t had the practice time with the new pieces to get that execution together. In the meantime…lets hope they can some how figure out how to refine that team execution on the fly. With guys like Paul George, West, Hansbrough and Granger, that should have entirely new roles in this new team context…it’s going to be tough.

peac.e

by trucutter on Jan 14, 2012 2:05 AM EST up reply actions  

Give it up already

How long have you been a Pacers fan? Have you seen this team for the last 5 years? I can’t believe you consistently complain about winning ugly and an 8-3 record. West and Hill are nice pieces, but they didn’t just sign Lebron Wade and Bosh, your expectations are ridiculously high. This team is still a work in progress and with the short training camp and games practically every day there is little time to practice, so why would you think they should gel immediately and be blowing out a scrappy Toronto team on the road? The effort has been there every night and at times the defense has been suffocating. What this team needs is to continue to win ugly until the offense comes around, which it will. I don’t think a trade helps right now unless it’s for a superstar which isn’t happening. If they stay healthy the offense will only get better and they will make some noise in the playoffs, but they are not going to the finals this year, lower your expectations and be happy that Pacers basketball is back. Larry has built a solid team, but the process back to being legitimate contenders is a slow one, it’s hard to get big time free agents to come here and despite popular belief trading Danny Granger will not get you a superstar. Teams don’t trade superstars for guys like Granger, and no Eric Gordon is not a superstar. We have to develop our guys, hope Paul George becomes as good as we all hope, and play great team ball to be an elite team. It’s a work in progress, have some patience and next time you might want to actually watch the game before ranting about how bad they suck for getting a road win.

by donnyfher on Jan 14, 2012 11:03 AM EST up reply actions  

yes they are missing another scorer off the bench

that’s why Bird was upset when Jamal Crawford stayed home and signed with Portland. Unfortunately, NBA scorers don’t grow on trees. Gotta go with what ya got right now.

by Tom Lewis on Jan 14, 2012 12:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I actually prefer the close ones...

b/c they prep us for late-game situs that we’ll see more and more as the season goes. I mean, the Lakers barely beat the Cavs in Staples last night. Blow outs are fine, but they are much less an indicator of playoff, half-court, real bball. It reminds me of how the Suns would rout teams, but the Spurs would almost always be in close contests, no matter the opponent. Let the runners run, I’ll take the those teams that execute in the half-court on both O & D. The Mavs used to be runners, but once Rick showed them how important the half-court game was, they became true contenders.

P.S. Stop it, Danny! You’re not a superstar, you don’t get away with that. We have to earn everything we’re gonna get, just as every good/great Pacer team had to. Be a leader, learn from D. West, and make the right decisions before LB ships you.

by abeas1 on Jan 14, 2012 10:13 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Indiana Pacers. Email: indycornrows@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

D_oh_small
Question for Cornrowers...not Heat vs. Pacers related.

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Miami Heat are the Perfect Example as to Why Fans Should Boycott the NBA
Small
PACER PRIDE???
Bcampheadshot2_small
On Flagrant Fouls and Soft Play
Small
Game 5
1565007530_small
Devil's Take - Pacers dry up, Heat steal one
Small
Wade aging quickly and gracelessly - Bill Reiter, Foxsports
Small
How to improve on game 3
Small
Colin Cowherd- TOTALLY DISRESPECTED THE PACERS, THE CITY AND OUR FANS!!!!!!!!!! (NOT RIGHT)
1565007530_small
Devil's Take - Swagger On, Heat Off
Imagescaphwx17_small
Confusion??

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

Iclogo_new_small Tom Lewis

Editor

Core_small Nathan S.

Authors

The_outside_world_small Ian Levy

Small Glenn A.