New trade possibility
With Jerry West taking over for the Warriors, he is looking to shake things up. They need size and other pieces to fit around Steph Curry and David Lee. West is going to start considering offers for Monte Ellis. I think Ellis is one of the top 5 scorers in the league, an elite athlete who can shoot, finish at the rim, and take clutch shots (all things the Pacers need.)
My only concern with him is that he is undersized for a SG but shoots too much for a PG. I wouldn't be quite sure how he would fit in next to Collison and George. He is more of the Derrick Rose type PG than the Chris Paul type PG, and I prefer distributors who can score at the PG instead of scorers who can distribute.
Anyways, I think we could put together a solid package for him (Granger, #15 pick, maybe Rush.) What do you guys think?
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Woah!
The only way I want Ellis back is in the form of a salary dump. If we’re giving up our 6’9 one-dimensional scorer, why the hell would we take back a 6’3 one-dimensional scorer from a worse team?
"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"
Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.
Wow!!
You over value that guy to the max. Danny is a 22 ppg guy. Ellis is 25ppg. Danny is 6’9’ Ellis 6’2’. Danny plays D. Ellis doesnt. Ellis is a good player. Put him with Danny and George and your golden. I would give up the 15th pick, and salary for him, but not our core. I would do a 15, posey, rush, price swap. I would even throw in Stephenson and his potential. But not any one of our core players.
This is...um...EXACTLY what I said
So, I have to ask you: “Who you tellin?”
"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"
Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.
I would much rather have Curry....
for Ellis and a conditional (top3 protected) 1st rd. pick next year for DG, then I d prolly do it.
I'm sorry, I love Ellis and Curry
but swapping either of them for Granger does not make us better. As Luke said, getting them to play alongside Granger would be great, but building a team around them obviously isn’t working…
"My game’s like the Pythagorean Theorem. It ain’t got no answer." - Shaq
Follow me on Twitter @Numb3rs4C0v3RS
by bleedinblueandgold on Jun 2, 2011 12:48 PM EDT reply actions
Too much
Take you the 5th pick and you got a deal even though the GSW’s come out on top according to the espn trade machine.
by PatsR18andDONEwithoutCHEATING on Jun 2, 2011 12:53 PM EDT reply actions
I would take Biedrins' horrid contract on to get Ellis.
He’s the scorer the Pacers need.
but as everyone mentioned
only if we can retain Granger and George.
Yeah, that ought to be some pretty good motivation for them
They have Dorrell Wright, who can play the 2. Between the 11 and 15 they ought to get a guy like Chris Singleton who can step in at 3. We could offer Posey, Rush and teh #15 for Ellis and Biedrins and give them an immediate savings in the $10-$11 million range, plus all of Biedrins/Ellis’s remaining millions and years. I still don’t know if Ellis co-exists with Collison in the same backcourt and it probably forces George back to the bench, which I don’t like. But acquiring a scorer of Ellis’s caliber would make it easier to stomach trading Danny for a PF upgrade or for Kanter.
Let’s assume we could do my deal to bring in Ellis. Then there are two Danny deals I think make sense:
1. This is the “win now” model. Trade Danny for Al Jefferson straight up, or Danny for Millsap, Hayward and the #12. Either way, I doubt they’re getting better offers for Jefferson or Millsap and either way we get a post upgrade.
2. This is the “build for the future” model. Trade Danny for Okur, Hayward and the #3 OR Okur, Bell and both picks (#3 and #12). We could then take Kanter at the #3 and have a guy who has a chance of being as good as Al Jefferson for much cheaper. Or with the second deal we get another pick (a shot at Jimmer?) for the cost of taking on Bell’s crappy contract.
"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"
Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.
Oh
And in the tradition of rosterbating a new rotation, with both of my trades our depth chart looks like this:
PG—Collison/Price/Stephenson/Jimmer?
SG—Ellis/D. Jones
SF—George/(Hayward maybe)
PF—Jefferson (or Millsap)/Hansbrough
C—Hibbert/(Kanter maybe)/Biedrins
I’d see Collison and Ellis splitting PG duty 75/25
Ellis and George splitting SG duty 70/30
George and Hayward (or D. Jones or Dunleavy) splitting SF duty 60/40
Jefferson (or Millsap) and Hansbrough splitting PF duty 65/35
Hibbert and Jefferson (or Kanter) splitting C duty 60/40
"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"
Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.
Would we go Kanter at 3?
Only ask because we still have an unaccounted for Okur (so C would be Hibbert, Biedrins/Okur). But if we go Knight at 3, we can go Morris twin at 15 (even though I love Jimmer and really want us to draft him).
Oh...yeah
I was simply including the rotting corpse of Mehmet Okur to match salaries. As much as I LOVED his game when he was healthy (Rik Smitsish) I’m skeptical he ever comes back full strength.
Kanter has some ominous injury questions himself, but without them he’s a top-3 lock in just about any draft. WITH them he’s a top-4 lock in this craptacular draft. I think the dropoff between him and Knight (even considering my sizable Knight mancrush) is pretty significant. I don’t see how a team with a glaring hole at game-changing 4/5 (like…ahem…the Pacers) could afford to pass on Kanter at 3. But that’s just me.
"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"
Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.
I'm stunned
That people think Danny Granger is on the same level as Ellis. One guy is an elite athlete who gets to the rim and can finish while having a mid range game and plays subpar defense. The other is a set shooter who isn’t athletic and plays subpar defense. Which brings me to one of my main points: Why do Pacers’ fans still think Danny Granger is a good defender? He is not a good defender so don’t post that garbage. Furthermore, why would we trade a scorer for a scorer? Besides the reasons already listed, age is a major factor and we have a replacement for DG in George. I think George is a SF, not a SG. My biggest dilema is whethere Ellis plays the 1 or 2.
Question
Can Ellis defend NBA 3s and 4s? No? Didn’t think so.
Granger allowed a 15.2 PER against SFs and an 18.3 PER against PFs. Ellis was eaten alive by his counterparts, allowing a 17.1 against PGs, an 18.4 against SGs and a 21.8 against SFs.
In fact, they’re very similar statistically, each sharing 9 “wins” in a statistical comparison, and three of Ellis’s “wins” were the ones that don’t matter (mpg, fouls pg and games played…he got Danny by 1 this year).
There doesn’t seem to be any evidence that these two players’ values on the open market shouldn’t be similar. They’re paid similarly. Their teams are similarly bad (though it can be argued that Indiana achieved more with less). They are statistically equal, though not identical. As far as your “getting to the rim,” you don’t even have a statistical leg to stand on for that claim. Danny shot 0.5 more FTs per game last year than Ellis.
"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"
Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.
What stats do you have that Danny is a subpar defender?
Danny isn’t an elite defender by any means but he is a very solid one. Not to mention he is a pretty good rebounder at the three position. Ellis is a brutal defender and extremely undersized. No question he is a better scorer but he is not a better basketball player. I love him next to Granger and George, but not in place of one of them.
"My game’s like the Pythagorean Theorem. It ain’t got no answer." - Shaq
Follow me on Twitter @Numb3rs4C0v3RS
by bleedinblueandgold on Jun 2, 2011 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions
What about Rip from the pistons...
I know he has a huge contract for the next two years but he would be a good scorer of the bench.
Well everyone should like this one
GSW Get: Danny Granger, #15 and Brandon Rush.
Pacers Get: Monta Ellis and Ekpe Udoh.
I think everyone was high on Ekpe coming out of cellege.
LET THE HATERS HATE.
no way
i don’t see ekpe udoh ever becoming a good starter. he’s good on D, but not much else. and i really really really don’t want to trade danny AND our first round pick for ellis. he’s overrated. he would not be putting up 25 a game for a championship contender.
Harper's on Miller, McKey, gets in to Miller for the win and...
Hail to the Orange.
Hail to the Blue.
Hail Alma Mater,
Ever so true.
We love no other,
So let our motto be
Victory, Illinois, Varsity.
Chief Illiniwek lives
by wonillionaire on Jun 2, 2011 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions
I got one
GSW gets: Collison, Rush, and #15
Pacers get: Ellis, and Biedrins
Kinda depends on whether GSW sees Curry as a straight PG, or want to move him to SG. Also, big cash dump for them. Probally wouldn’t work, go ahead and bash me for it :)
This type of player just doesn't work
Isn’t Ellis one of those guys who can put up the points, but that’s IT? I feel sorry for players like this because for one, he’s a tweener, and two, teams will take a chance that he can be their leader. Yeah, he’s decent with the assists and steals, but when do score-first point guards REALLY help a team, unless they can take a back-seat and come off the bench like Jamal Crawford. A great game here and there doesn’t make for a good starter.
Guys like Ellis frustrate me because they can be so impressively talented, but limited at the same time. I think Ellis is squarely in the mold of Iverson and Starbury, where there is incredible offensive talent, but huge ego and lack of fundamentals.
I don’t care if a guy can put up 25 a game consistently if he can’t do a couple other things really well. What else does Ellis do? Steals are great, but what else? What I’m looking for is leadership and fundamentals. A “leading” scorer has to have these things or he’s constantly a liability by not facilitating the offense and putting up poor shots. If he has to have the ball in his hands, he better learn that he’s not the answer. I’m frustrated for Golden State.
To compare his worth to Granger, it’s almost apples to apples on paper, but you can’t teach length, lack of thug-ness, modesty, and the ability to guard 3 positions. I also think Granger works hard at being a well-rounded player, and while it’s taking some time, will probably pay big dividends in the next couple of seasons. Does Ellis work at anything other than squeezing in more tattoos?
Ellis is probably destined to be frustrated and drag his team down because his ego was too big, yet teams will continue to put him in a position to score for them, just like they did for Iverson and Starbury. You might say it’s working for D. Rose isn’t it?? Well the thing about Rose is he LEADS and he works hard to improve. He’ll need those things when he loses a step. Those two things are so incredibly rare and valuable in a player, and I don’t see Ellis having either.
Granger might not be the best leader, but he definitely tries a lot more than Ellis does, and combined with the other intangibles, i’d rather have them play together than swap them.
Jamal Crawfords a shoot first point guard? Hmm, thats news to me.....
You arent actually comparing Ellis to Iverson, Starbury, I could see, but come on man not even close.
by Justin Arnold on Jun 5, 2011 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions
?!?
allen iverson is one of the greatest players of all time – this is not a controversial statement. monta ellis is at his best borderline all-star. i would trade any three players on the pacers’ roster plus picks for an in-his-prime iverson. just look at the rest of the roster he drug to the finals…
otherwise, i agree with you that ellis isn’t the player we need.
I just can't take this anymore
I’m sort of sick of everyone evaluating imaginary trades and things that won’t and probably shouldn’t happen by saying Player A has a “lack of thug-ness” or you can’t teach modesty or any other factor that has nothing to do with on court play. KG is probably the least modest player in the league (with the chest thumping, screaming, and trash talking) and I would have been pumped to get him a few years ago. If you recall, Reggie was sort of a dick, but that made him great. He would grab his crotch and throw up the choke sign and we ate it up. Why? Mostly because he was good. I realize that there is a difference between Artest charging into the crowd and Reggie pissing off everyone at MSG (a huge difference, mind you) but can we PLEASE stop analyzing fake trades by looking at someone’s supposed “thug-ness.”
Marcus Thorton
would be a much cheaper, just as effective version of Monta Ellis, Jamaal Crawford or Jason Terry…plus he already has great chemistry with DC.

by 























