Indiana Pacers 2010-11 Player Review: Paul George
Paul George
#24 / Guard-Forward / Indiana Pacers (Rookie)
Not everyone was terribly excited when Paul George’s name was called on Draft Night. A swingman who was being compared mostly to Danny Granger? An upside project on a team that needed immediate help to erase the franchise’s worst season in 21 years? But it wasn’t even a year later that George had impressed fence-leaners and been hailed as the future of the franchise. That’s quite a jump for a 20-year old player coming into the league on a losing mid-major program.
So how do you go from "B- grade pick" to steal of the draft? To be fair, George’s potential was, and is still, largely a mystery. But instead of "will he pan out?" it’s starting to turn into, "just how good will he be?" When you are labeled by "might be the best player in the draft," it’s hard not to get swept up into it. But despite all the hype and praise, George’s rookie season was still an incredible success.
The Legend of George actually began in Summer League when George shook off his inability to even dribble the ball and bad play by capping an impressive comeback against the Celtic summer leaguers. After putting in obscene amounts of work alongside Roy Hibbert, the leaps and bounds George showcased from summer league to preseason was remarkable.
He began the season within the Indiana rotation in place of the suspended Brandon Rush, but once Rush returned, and played well, George was left fighting for scrap minutes that quickly disappeared all together. Over a six week stretch leading up to the New Year, George played just 9 minutes of basketball, far from ideal for a first rounder on a losing team.
He finally started seeing minutes, albeit, far from consistent around the New Year, with a tremendous and highlight reel effort against the Wizards, scoring 13 points, grabbing 7 boards, and knocking out 5 steals in the much needed win. This game really helped showcase George’s defensive chops. Despite being raw at times, the kid was learning and already had the best defensive tools on the team.
Despite empty defensive preaching from Jim O’Brien, George would see big minutes one night, nearly none the next. The inconsistency really held him from exploding for that breakout game Pacers fans were dying to see. Everything was a learning experience for the 20-year-old, who despite 17 points on 10 shots in a loss against Denver, was lit up by a hot Carmelo Anthony. It was a great learning experience, especially when you consider the game and its coaching into context.
Following O’Brien’s firing, George was given steady minutes in the Pacres’ Goon Squad and had his best stretch of the season, playing a big role in the second unit with highlight plays and big defensive showcases, reaching double figures in 12 of 19 games. George was promoted into the starting lineup for the season’s final stretch, and while it helped the team’s effort in clinching their playoff berth, it seemed to relegate George too much on offense. It took him out of plays for long stretches and didn’t do a particularly good job involving him or setting him up in ways that he could help the team.
It wasn’t a major issue except when nothing seemed to work, and a "well, let’s see what George can do" play seemed like the perfect diagnosis, but yet continued to shy away from him. His midrange game proved to be incredibly sublime, but it felt severely underutilized late in the season. When he was hot though, he was tough to stop, finally getting his much maligned three point shot to fall in the playoff clincher against the Wizards, scoring 23 points on five three pointers.
But while his offensive game seemed a little shortchanged, it was his defensive game that was drawing the most attention. As the postseason began, George was given the seemingly impossible task of stopping the season’s future MVP Derrick Rose, who attempted a ridiculous 21 free throw attempts in Game 1. But as the series wore on, it was George’s defense on Rose, defined by big steals, big stops, and three merciless blocks that helped become the blueprint on how to stop the most unstoppable player in the league.
So how did Paul impress?
It was hard to not take notice of how natural it seemed at times for the rookie. In addition to those superb blocks on Rose in the postseason, George fancied himself a highlight factory, with big dunks, big defensive plays, big shots galore. It seemed with the clock running down, he was more than poised to hit the buzzer beater, which he did numerous times. Some of his moves to the basket were certified "big boy" moves, leaving the defense stunned.
His .453 shooting percentage doesn’t look like much, but George shot an astounding .537 within the three point arc. His midrange jumper often seemed the surest thing next to whatever Dirk Nowitzki throws at the basket any given play. And even that 54% seemed fairly low from what he was hitting earlier in the season, when he connected on roughly 100% of his jumpers. That midrange jumper could certainly prove to be one of his most lethal assets moving forward, a devastating bail out and run stopper.
And how did George disappoint?
Most everything disappointing about George in his rookie season seems like it will be fixed in time. His poor three point shooting was curiously confusing. Don’t let his .297 fool you into thinking it was that good. But it never seemed like it was a bad shot for him to put up; it just didn’t fall for him. In fact, most of his weaknesses started coming around as the season progressed. His defense only got better, his ball handling skills improved dramatically. Whether a result of being more active defensively, his fouls grew to troublesome heights during the season’s final stretch.
The only possible concern could be in a lack of flow within the starting lineup offense. That can be possibly be solved by simply making him a larger part, but whether it was his youth leading him to play passive offensively or whether that could be a larger problem will remain to be seen.
Well, what’s next for King George?
The question is pretty simple: How good is Paul George? Can he live up to the Tracy McGrady billings with All-Defensive abilities? Is he a defensively focused Danny Granger? Something as simple as the next Andre Iguodala? Regardless of what he becomes, whether he lives up to any of his hype, there’s no denying he’s the main reason the Pacers and their fans feel good. Watching George grow, with his charisma, strong work ethic, and down to earth likability will be the main reason to tune into Pacers games.
It’s true there are no untouchable players on a 37-win team, but let’s face it: the list of players we’d considering trading George for is dwindling by the day, and it’d take something very impressive to pry him away from this team. It’s good to have a player like that wearing your team’s jersey.
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
<3
The key to him being AWESOME is him learning to dribble better…
If he can become that slasher we need… life would be awesome lol
What he said.
Thug Life. It's a Pacers thing, you wouldn't get it.
by infinityzero.systemerror on Jun 18, 2011 7:58 PM EDT up reply actions
After the Hans pick the previous year, we really hit the jack-pot with PG. Love the kids determination to work at getting better, he really wants to be the next big thing. Need to get this guy more involved next year along with Hibbert and perhaps Granger will start to focus more on the defensive side when he realizes he can rely on his teammates to help with the scoring load.
If Lance can have a break out next year (and I truly believe he will as long as he stays out of trouble off the court), we could have a solid foundation for years to come.
Now, I just want to draft Reggie Jackson in the 20’s somehow (trade Rush for a pick possibly). A future Reggie Jackson, PG front court would be very scary from a defensive standpoint and would take a lot of pressure off Hibbert (in case we can’t get an athletic PF).
And it's now my sig
by Bronn on May 17, 2011 4:56 PM EDT
There is literally no one in the NBA I would trade him for
…And I’ll be the first to tell you he’s got a ton of work to do on offense. But like Nathan said, most of it will fix itself in time. I LOVE this guy.
"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"
Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.
by LukeNukem on Jun 18, 2011 8:57 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
To b honest....
I threw a tnatrum whn we picked George. I didnt know anything about him. My want list went 1-9. But, ends up to be a great pick. Glad they didnt draft Ed Davis.
i didnt throw a fit
But ill admit I was a bit perplexed. Speaking of davis, I was against him last summer but in retrospect he looks legit.
"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"
Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.
by LukeNukem on Jun 19, 2011 3:21 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I'm still not convinced Ed Davis isn't going to be broken in half at any moment
He does look solid though. A month outside the draft last year I had no clue who PG was. Then the combine and workouts started and he started getting major, major hype. Still hadn’t ever seen him play, and not like it’s easy to track down Fresno St games in Indiana. I was excited when we picked him, just because he was so young and a bona fide “upside guy”, really not Bird’s MO. Nervous, but excited.
I’m not nervous anymore.
KEEP COACH FRANK
Yeah...
…I remember Marc Spears’ article about PG. Some anonymous league executive (has to be anonymous, right? There’s no such thing as a named source anymore) in the article made the “Tracy McGrady” comparison and that’s when it seemed like his name took off. NBAdraft.net also had mocked him on in the top-10 the year before he came out, but Fresno was really awful his sophomore year and I think his name dropped off a bit as a result. He sure is a smooth player to watch. His talent + a Hibbert-like work ethic could equal out to a superstar.
And he has the work ethic
He has it all, honestly. Kid’s too good to be true sometimes. I’m not ready to say he WILL be a superstar, but I have no doubt he’s going to be better than Danny as soon as the latter half of next season. Probably won’t score as much as Danny, but he’ll be better.
KEEP COACH FRANK
Paul George really needs to be our 2nd offensive option next year.
Look, I love Danny Danger, but his game has probably hit his ceiling as far as development, maybe more post game. But Danny will never be an ISO player who can consistently create for himself and others off the dribble. Paul can. I see him more as a Paul Pierce than McGrady, but both comparisons are high praise.
Next to Darren, Paul should be 2nd in command to run the offense. Danny should focus on a post game and Miller-like movement off the ball, using screens to open him up for catch-and-shoot/drive opps. Much like Allen and Pierce in Boston, Granger and George need to emulate that dynamic. Paul may not score as much, but his overall abilities are paramount to this team taking the next step.
Paul George is the future!
I see him growing into a more complete player this next year, and hopefully he can be the number 2 man that the pacers need!
The craziest thing was first I was mad they played themselves out of a chance to get John Wall. Then I was mad we didnt trade the 10th pick for a pg. Then was mad we drafted yet ANOTHER WING player for a team already stacked there. Then I read about him, watched his videos, and started warming up to the idea a bit(still thought we should have drafted a PF). Then I saw him play. My god the kid could jump out of the gym, hes got a silky smooth shot that just looks like its going to go down every time he lets it fly. He works on his ball handling, 3pt shooting and maybe his passing a bit and he will be unbelievable. This kids a 5 tool player like they say in baseball. Speed, athleticism, shooting ability, defense, and incredible work ethic. That sounds to me like star in short.
Yeah same here
I was pissed when I say Paul Goerge was listed as a SF the one position the Pacers have way too many of and thought they should have drafted either SG-James Anderson, PF-Patrick Patterson, or C-Cole Aldrich. And at first I thought he would be a failure at the SG position just like Marquise Danniels, Mike Doneleavy, Stephen “Just Shoot Me” Jackson, and Shawnnie “The Walking Arrest” Williams. But MAN WAS I EVER WRONG ON THAT ONE.
And just for the record,
SG-Paul George-PPG-6, RPG-5
C-Cole Aldrich-PPG-1, RPG-1.9
PF-Patrick Patterson-PPG-6.3, RPG-3.8
SG-James Anderson-PPG-3.6, RPG-.9
by PatsR18andDONEwithoutCHEATING on Jun 20, 2011 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions
I still wish the Pacers would have sucked enough to draft John Wall
He would have been the answer at PG prior to the Collison trade, and would’ve been a perfect fit. But yeah, they don’t come much better as consolation prizes than Wall.
"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"
Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.
And do you think the Pacers could have still got a good player for T Murph?
New Orleans wanted to trade Collision because CP3 was healthy and they wanted to trade him to who ever would bite before the season started. There wern’t really any NBA teams I can think of eager to trade a SG or athletic big man for someone like Troy Murphy and that’s what the Pacers would have had to get if they’d drafted John Wall.
by PatsR18andDONEwithoutCHEATING on Jun 20, 2011 11:30 PM EDT reply actions


























