Pacers' Draft Possibilities: Alec Burks
With the Draft Lottery complete, the Early Entry List set, and the NBA Draft fast approaching, it's time to examine more in depth some of the players who could be available for the Pacers. Over the next few weeks I'll be trying to put together as many profiles as possible. Instead of identifying players as specific targets for either Pacers' pick, I'm just going to cover a pool of players I think are possibilities. You'll find some players who the Pacers would likely have to trade up or down for. I've also expressed my opinion that the Pacers need to be focused on talent as much as fit so players at all five positions will be included.
These profiles are not intended to advocate for one player over another, just examine their strengths and weaknesses, and discuss in some detail what they have to offer. For each profile I provided Ten Important Statistics to guide the discussion. Today we'll be looking at:
Alec Burks - SG - 6'6" 193 lbs. - University of Colorado
|
Pts/40 |
Reb/40 |
Ast/40 |
Stl/40 |
2PT% |
3PT% |
FT% |
FT/40 |
TO/40 |
USG% |
|
25.1 |
7.9 |
3.6 |
1.3 |
50.8% |
29.2% |
82.5% |
9.7 |
3.2 |
25.5 |
Current DraftExpress Projection: Round 1, Pick #15
Strengths:
- Does an excellent job of creating his own shot, terrific slasher, very effective in isolation or on the pick-and-roll
- Usually looks to score, but has the tools to create shots for his teammates
- Gets to the foul line at a high rate
- Solid rebounder for his size
Weaknesses:
- Really struggles with his jumpshot at this point, has inconsistent form, shows a little more confidence than is warranted in his shooting ability, doesn't appear to have NBA three-point range
- Needs some work on defensive fundamentals, lack of strength makes it difficult for him to fight through screens or guard bigger, stronger players
- Will likely need to adjust to a smaller usage role at the next level
Impressions:
- Jonathan Givony, DraftExpress.com
Comparables:
- James Anderson - 910
- Dominique Jones - 902
- Brandon Roy - 900
- See the rest of Alec Burks' comparables at Hickory High
How he can help the Pacers:
Burks could be the elite perimeter shot-creator and penetrator the Pacers' have been lacking. No one currently on the roster has as much ability to get themselves into the lane off the dribble, finding a good scoring opportunity at the rim or from the free throw line. Having a player like Burks would add some versatility to the Pacers' offense and hopefully create more space on the floor for everyone else to operate comfortably. Paul George seems to have established himself as the starting shooting guard with his strong play against the Bulls. That and his limited shooting ability would like keep Burks in a bench role to start his career. If A.J. Price returns, they would could work as a very effective tandem - Burks as the primary ball handler and creator, Price spotting up for open jumpers. Although he has some clear limitations, Burks skill set seems to fill a Pacers' need as well as any player who might be available at #15.
Video:
More Information:
- DraftExpress Profile
- ESPN Draft Profile
- NBADraft.net Profile
44 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Do want
And Price shooting jumpers? Do not want.
A slasher is out biggest need. If hes there I want him taken. For some reason I thought he was projected a lot higher than 15… guess I am not keeping up with the draft close enough.
I don't want Price at all
But I think he’ll be more effective without the ball. Burks has dropped the past week according to DraftExpress
There are really only two plays: Romeo and Juliet, and put the darn ball in the basket. ~Abe Lemons
Find me at IndyCornrows
and Hickory-High
Have we brought him in for a workout?
If he drops… I want. We need a slasher bad and he is worth the risk IMO.
Singleton, Ferdette, Faried, ect are safter IMO… but god this would fill a need
I doubt he drops to the Pacers
But if he does, Indiana can’t pass this guy up. Burks is a young,athletic slasher oozing with potential. I’m not sure who to compare his game to, maybe D Wade lite ?
by gut19 on Jun 15, 2011 11:05 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
I thought the exact same thing
If he could turn out to half of what Wade is we’d have a good future with him and PG
Lots of mocks have him falling
Can’t for the life of me see why. I guess he did hurt his shoulder in a workout a little over a week ago in Detroit, but that hasn’t seemed to slow him down. While I love the idea of Burks, this could be one of those situations where another team wants to trade the farm to move up and take him, and they could either jump in front of us by a pick or two or offer us something we couldn’t refuse. Either way, if he’s there at #15 it’d be hard to pass him up.
"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"
Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.
Would you rather Burks or Brooks
Brooks has the jumpshot already, but Burks has more potential.
http://everymonthmarch.wordpress.com/2011/06/15/draft-debates-marshon-brooks-vs-alec-burks/
Burks at #15 for sure
Just because I think there’s a possibility we could get Brooks later. I’m starting to warmup on Brooks, but he’s definitely more available in our range, and perhaps even in a trade back than Burks.
"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"
Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.
I like Burks a little more too
but agree he’s probably gone before the Pacers are on the clock.
Brooks wouldn’t be a bad alternative if Burks wasn’t available though.
Pass Pass and Pass
Jamal Crawford, J.R. Smith, Shannon Brown, and Marcus Thornton will all be free agents this summer. They would all get immediate playing time also as they are not 3 year projects. I just dont see the huge Burks potential. I dont see him helping our team any next year or anytime in the near future because of his lack of defense, inconsistent jumper and no 3 point shot. Either swing for the fences and draft the guy who is drawing Kobe comparisons (Marshon Brooks) or draft someone who can help us immediately and for years to come (Ex: Chris Singleton)
by Shank Williams Jr on Jun 15, 2011 1:16 PM EDT reply actions
Thorton is restricted
JR smith is a headcase who you don’t win with and Shannon Brown is MEH
I have been dreaming about and drinking tons of koolaid.....
I have thought so much about getting Burks it hurts. Or what we could do to get him. Some people have him as a PG/SG which is probably how Id play him, backing up Collison and George. If he develops like he should, he could be an allstar IMO. If not, he’ll be a great sixth man. Yeah, I like other guys in this draft too, but if we can get Burks at 15, we have to do it. Also, I was thinking, and if we(our FO) honestly think there will be an amnesty clause, then it might behoove us to get a RIP and the #8 pick, then buyout or use the amnesty clause on RIP. He can go to a contender and we can get Burks or someone at 8, plus our 15 and 40 whatever. I think there will be a TON of moves come draft day and I would like to see us at the very least, buying and/ or trading for another 1st rd pick.
Also, if Burks is there at 15, it’s because guys like Brooks, Thompson and Singleton have probably already been taken.
But if there's an amnesty clause wouldn't Detroit use it on Rip?
I figure they could stomach paying Charlie V (relatively cheap compared to Rip) and Gordon (actually still useful) if it meant they could unload Rip off the cap number.
"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"
Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.
I guess thats where we differ.....
IMO and if I am not mistaken. If you use the amnesty clause, you still have to pay the player, its just not counted against the cap. So to me I would think theyd let us pay the expensive one, then use it on Charlie V, to open up rotation, spots, cap and money, plus jump start their rebuilding. Because they are in a bad way in Detroit, in every sense.
by Justin Arnold on Jun 15, 2011 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions
That's possible with Charlie V, I guess
But of the three of them, only Rip is completely useless and utterly without trade value down the road, and Charlie is the cheapest. I could totally see them salary-dumping one and using it on the cheapest one (Charlie V) and just keeping Gordon on the roster until his contract becomes easier to stomach. But if they’re patient they could just use it on Rip and wait a year on the other two (who, in actuality, are still pretty good, at least offensively). But Dumars has been given a three year time limit, so I guess anything’s possible. He could totally freak out and start rebuilding right away in order to put something compelling together before he’s fired.
"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"
Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.
Or just do something with someone like Orlando.....
Gil and their 2012 and 2014 1st rd picks for filler ie. Posey, or Rush or Djones. Then they can use theirs on Hedo or vice versa with the players. Thats the only way they might get Howard to stay.
We dont have to do it with Detroit, but if we think there is gonna be a clause than we might as well do some dealings with a team with multiple bad contracts. Cleveland, Washington, Minnesota, Philadelphia etc.
by Justin Arnold on Jun 15, 2011 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Hard choice...
I’ve been advocating Marshon B. but Burks is a similar player that is rated higher. He is younger and more athletic, but Marshon has a more developed game with more defensive potential (long arms). As much as the mock drafts are showing Burks going lower than expected I tend to believe teams still rate him high and he will be picked way before the Pacers. So my pick is still Marshon B.
Marshon might get picked by Milwaukee...
which would probably have to happen for Burks to fall to us.
by Justin Arnold on Jun 15, 2011 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions
You think they'll go Brooks that high
despite having shoot first options like Brandon Jennings, Maggette, and Michael Redd? I could be wrong, but I think their weakness is at the 4, with Ilyasova and Larry Sanders being their only viable options. I see them going the Tristan Thompson/Donatas/Morris twin route. But that’s just me.
by Abe the Hoosier on Jun 15, 2011 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions
can't forget Drew Gooden!
And that insane 5/$35 contract or whatever they gave him.
KEEP COACH FRANK
I've tried to forget Drew Gooden
ever since he had that nasty afro puff rat tail.
by Abe the Hoosier on Jun 15, 2011 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions
just sayin theyve had him workout and the rumor is they are high on him.....
by Justin Arnold on Jun 15, 2011 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions
I heard the same thing
If I’m not mistaken, they’ve already worked him out twice and want to bring him in for a #3 but his agent is balking because he wants him to get a chance to visit other teams. I’d not be shocked if Milwaukee gave Brooks a promise at #10. Wouldn’t be the biggest reach in the world.
"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"
Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.
Don't see it happening
They do have over options at guard and they may be high on a lot of prospects but at #10 there’s little chance they reach on Brooks. They also like Vessley and Burks for that matter so I wouldn’t bet on Brooks going there.
I bet it's either Brooks or Marcus Morris
Based on all the rumors
"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"
Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.
Apart from Danny falling to us, does anyone remember what was predicted by the ‘experts’ before Bayless fell to us? I think it would take similar kind of luck to get Burks, but man do I hope he drops and we pick him.
By the time the draft rolled around
Bayless was starting to slide, DraftExpress had him going 10 (we were 11th when the draft started), Chad Ford had him 12th.
Oh, and Ford had us taking Rush 11th, AND Roy at 17, because he’s got GREAT sources and his final mocks are routinely extremely close. I know he had us taking Hans. Whoever his last one has us taking is a pretty good bet. Anyway, this is what he said about Rush;
The Pacers may very well go big here, with Kosta Koufos and Darrell Arthur as the targets. But chances are there will be a big man available when they draft at No. 17.
Rush won’t be there at 17, though, and he would be a great fit in the backcourt with T.J. Ford. Rush could be the next Joe Johnson.
Yikes. Great sources, but yeah, evaluation’s not exactly his strong suit.
KEEP COACH FRANK
NBAdraft.net
Not one of the most reliable, but certainly love them for keeping it real, accountability-wise. They keep all their mocks archived right there with the real drafts, so you can always see where they thought guys would go vs. where they went.
Here’s 2005’s (they thought Granger was going to Toronto at #7)
"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"
Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.
Has he put out his final mock for this draft yet?
Thug Life. It's a Pacers thing, you wouldn't get it.
by infinityzero.systemerror on Jun 15, 2011 8:35 PM EDT up reply actions
No. He'll do it day of
Teams dont’ really start talking to each other, let alone media, until right around then. At least not seriously.
"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"
Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.
This young man's a Beast!!!
Only Colorado player to have 500 points 200 boards 100 dimes
That’s pretty unbelievable considering the storied college basketball tradition at UC. I mean they had Chauncey Billups, David Harrison and . . .
There are really only two plays: Romeo and Juliet, and put the darn ball in the basket. ~Abe Lemons
Find me at IndyCornrows
and Hickory-High
Chauncey Billups was a pretty good combo guard....
but yeah, I get your snide point.
by Justin Arnold on Jun 16, 2011 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions

by 


























