Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Events Cause Mariners To Lose To Rangers

Statistical Query: Why Am I A Nene-Sayer?

One potential free agent target for the Pacers, mentioned frequently in Fan Posts, is Nene Hilario. I responded negatively to several of those posts, saying I didn't think Nene would be ideal for the Pacers. Glenn A. sent me an email asking me to elaborate. Setting aside the question of whether Nene would actually be willing to sign with Indiana, my concerns focus on cost and fit.

Most of the Fan Posts suggesting Nene, have been built around the idea that he could transition to power forward and play alongside Roy Hibbert.  The consensus among many here at Indy Conrows, seems to be that the Pacers need a Dale-Davis-style rebounder and shot-blocker to be a defensive presence on the interior. I certainly wouldn't be opposed to adding a player in that mold, but before we push that to the top of the list of off-season priorities, I'd like to point out two statistics. The first is 61.2%. That's the FG% the Pacers allowed their opponents on shots at the rim. It was the 4th best mark in the league this season. Only Boston, Milwaukee and Miami were better. The other statistic is 74.1%. That was the Pacers' Defensive Rebound Percentage this season and it ranked them 15th in the league. The Pacers don't have a single player who fits that Dale Davis template, but as a team they did a fairly good job of mitigating it. They could certainly improve in both departments, but I wouldn't characterize either as an area of weakness.

Star-divide

My plan for answering Glenn was to put together some statistics showing the Nene hasn't been effective as a power forward. I wasn't able to find any numbers to back up that assertion, mostly because he hasn't really played power forward. The past three seasons he has played center exclusively. The three seaons prior to that he played some power forward alongside Marcus Camby, but we have a tiny sample size since he only played 81 games over those three seasons.

Throughout NBA history there are plenty of examples of successful teams employing "twin towers" in the front court. The most successful recent examples I can think of are the David Robinson/Tim Duncan Spurs, and the Ralph Sampson/Hakeem Olajuwon Rockets. In each case both players were exceptional athletes. I don't think that would be the case with a Nene/Hibbert combination. Nene is very athletic for center. However, those advantages wouldn't be nearly as distinct when matched up with opposing power forwards. Having him regularly play on the perimeter, and have to defend pick-and-rolls and stretch fours, seems like it would be asking for trouble.

Now, I'm not completely opposed to Nene. I just don't think playing him at power forward for any extended stretch of time is realistic. While I have concerns about his value versus the cost; if he can be had for a reasonable price he would be fine with me as a center. This of course opens another can of worms. Pacers' fans will need to ask themselves this summer whether Roy Hibbert really is viable as a starting center. He was brutally bad for long stretches this season, including in the playoffs. I've pointed this out more than once, but the Pacers actually outscored the Bullsby a significant magin when Hibbert was on the bench.

Brett Hainline at Queen City Hoopshas created a Player Swap tool. You simply swap out one player for another, and a statistical projection is made for the effect on the team's win total. This tool projects that switching out Roy Hibbert for Nene this seasonwould have resulted in 16.6 more wins for the Pacers. You read that right, replacing Hibbert with Nene might have made them a 53 win team. I think this addresses the root problem. Much of the free agent discussion here at Indy Cornrows has focused on getting help at the power forward position. That may not be the proper frontcourt slot to be focusing attention on. As hard as this is to say, instead of finding impact centers who might be able to play alongside Hibbert, the Pacers might be better off finding an impact center who can take Hibbert's starting slot.

Comment 41 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Hibbert?

I still think Hibbert has two really important things going for him: youth and an incredible work ethic. Those are the cliches often used by those who support Hibbert, and I think they’re legitimate. He’s got size, youth, and continued potential which makes it easier for me to forgive/understand his inconsistencies. That said, if Hibbert continues to show himself to be plagued by inconsistency next season, then my perception will start to change about the player he can become. The sample size at that point would be too hard to ignore.

Ultimately what I’m saying is, at this point, based on cost effectiveness, potential, youth etc., if I had to choose between the two (Hibbert and Nene), I’d choose Hibbert. And while Ian brought up some hard-to-debate logic regarding the difficulties of a Hibbert-Nene tandem, I still wouldn’t mind Indy taking a chance on it…if the price is right, of course.

by Glenn A. on May 22, 2011 11:55 PM EDT reply actions  

Thanks Glenn

One other real concern which didn’t enter into this hypothetical scenario, is how Nene views himself. Indiana is probably not a super attractive destination for Nene. But if part of Indiana’s pitch is that he’s going to have to change positions and play alongside Hibbert, I would imagine it becomes even less attractive. I would be willing to bet he thinks of himself as a center, and I doubt changing roles would be a tantalizing proposition.

There are really only two plays: Romeo and Juliet, and put the darn ball in the basket. ~Abe Lemons
Find me at IndyCornrows
and Hickory-High

by Ian Levy on May 23, 2011 12:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

In my mind...

…it’s really hard to know what he wants. I think of Al Horford who’s been playing center his whole career thus far, and yet, he’s been genuinely open with his comments recently about wanting to play full-time PF rather than C. Obviously, getting paid was more important than playing position to him because he signed an extension and Atlanta’s nowhere near getting him a legitimate starting center he can play next to. Who knows? Maybe Nene is tired of banging with the big boys and would like to play at the 4. Plus, I remember Nene being billed as mostly a PF during his draft. I always thought his center placement with the Nuggets had more to do with necessity than him being a “true center.” I do see your point, though, he has played the position for so long now, you wonder if he’s ready and willing to make a drastic change at this point.

by Glenn A. on May 23, 2011 1:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Keep Hibbert a part of long term plans

A very interesting differing view point. I have not looked at the statistical analysis, but considering the salaries, Hibbert is a bargain. He has been inconsistent, no doubt about that. But he has shown the ability at times to be a good scorer. At his size, if he can develop some go to low post moves, he could become one of the best centers in the league. My main concern with him going forward is his tendency to doubt himself. When he questions his own effectiveness, he can be a liability, which became apparent in the playoffs. His game one performance against the Bulls showed his potential. He got involved early and the team followed his lead. As far as Nene goes, I do agree that he would have a difficulty playing out of position. I still believe the Pacers are better served to find a true power forward who can compliment Roy, rather than trying to replace him.

by thomasezekiel77 on May 23, 2011 12:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry to dominate the comments here...

…but I wanted to make one more comment regarding people’s assumption that Nene will be re-signing with Denver, no questions asked. Some are beginning to think that it’s highly possible he will opt out, and this speculation is based on some comments Nene made a month or so ago to the Denver Post:

But it’s not all about the next contract for Nene. There is a large component of appreciation that Nene says is missing, and that’s proving to be equally as important as the dollars.

“If I play happy, if I enjoy the game, my game improves,” Nene said. "I did my best for the team, for the city. I tried to do my best for the fans. But the (Nuggets) need to understand you need to see the return on the other side, or you need to look for it. You need to look for it sometimes.

“They don’t realize all of the sacrifices I made. When you don’t feel appreciated, it’s hard.”

Is there some posturing going on there? Possibly. But with the Melodrama and the Nuggets’ inability to extend him during the season, I could see Nene being dissatisfied enough to at least taking at look at other teams.

by Glenn A. on May 23, 2011 1:21 AM EDT reply actions  

if we somehow got Nene

with our luck he would fall apart. again

and hibbert was pretty bad this year. that fg% was atrocious.

by dbcb on May 23, 2011 6:15 AM EDT reply actions  

Just pretend he's a guard.

Suddenly he’s great.

Thug Life. It's a Pacers thing, you wouldn't get it.

by infinityzero.systemerror on May 23, 2011 6:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

I had an argument with you a few months ago on Nene at PF

And I reluctantly admitted he probably couldn’t play PF, at least not next to Hibbert who cannot shoot. But I think one thing we’re sort of missing is that Hibbert still has a lot of developing to do. He’s a late bloomer who needs good coaching and conditioning, and a lot of that has been inconsistent during his career. I am not the hugest Hibbert fan, and if another team wanted to overpay us for him I’d be on board, especially considering that among this year’s free agent class (Gasol, Nene, Oden, plus lesser guys like Dalembert and DeAndre Jordan) and Stanko we could probably cobble together a solid center rotation. But for the true Hibbert believer/apologist, you can’t give up on a 7’2 guy with his hands, feet and vision. He’s too rare. That’s where the PF need perception comes from. Well, that and for most of the last 1.5 years we had some of the worst PF play in the league. You can’t just forget about that (just because our center play was also bad).

I’ve cooled on Nene, but I’d be happy to sign him on and risk that he can’t play PF next to Hibbert if the price is right. Unfortunately, I’m assuming he’ll demand too much and likely want to sign elsewhere.

"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"

Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.

by LukeNukem on May 23, 2011 8:05 AM EDT reply actions  

I have always considered Nene a Center only

And that’s why he’s been high on my target list.

It has been my opinion for some time that Roy Hibbert needs to be replaced, before he signs his next contract. Paying rookie scale for a mediocre and entirely unreliable player is survivable, but committing long term in a market that grossly over values bigs could be devastating.

The problem with trying to find a PF to play next to Roy is that you have to find a great player. Essentially, you’re looking for someone who will cover all of Roy’s weaknesses, and that’s just not going to happen.

And that’s always going to be the core problem with Hibbert. There’s no way that you can marginalize his presence enough so that he doesn’t hurt the team. He’s a woefully inefficient offensive player, particularly in the post, but if he’s there, the temptation to try to get something out of him will be overwhelming. You can’t convert him to a defensive/rebounding center because he doesn’t defend the post well, he doesn’t defend the PnR well, and he does a poor job of protecting the rim.

The counter-argument is that he’s young, but I find that weak. When you look at his problems, where he needs to improve, they aren’t skills, they’re attributes. Even at the reduced weight, he was slow and lacking in athleticism. He was never strong enough to hold position, even at the heavier weight, and it’s unlikely that he ever will be. More importantly, he is just far, far too fragile mentally to ever put much trust in.

Ultimately, for Hibbert to be the kind of player that this organization needs him to be, he needs to become a different person, not a better player. I don’t believe that a wise thing to do.

But others might, and the market is likely to see a likeable 7’2" Center in his mid-20’s, and gamble on what could (but never will) be. I think whoever takes that gamble is going to lose, and lose badly. You’re far better off replacing him, before you have to pay him.

by count55 on May 23, 2011 8:12 AM EDT reply actions  

I think you might be catastrophizing his earning potential

In the new CBA, where the MLE will probably dip close to $4.5-$5 mil even, I can see Hibbert making something in the $6-$7 mil range per year. If he can produce career numbers close to what he did this year, from a statistical standpoint that’s a pretty decent relative value. The real problem is that his limitations make him impossible to pair with a “regular” power forward. Tyler Hansbrough is actually a perfect fit next to him except that he sucks at defense and rebounding, so one of two things needs to happen: Tyler needs to get better at that stuff, or Roy needs to get better at shooting 15+ footers.

"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"

Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.

by LukeNukem on May 23, 2011 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Then I don't know what to tell you

Current centers making the kind of money I propose for Hibbert:

Jermaine O’Neal-$6.2
Joel Przybilla-$7.4
DeSagana Diop-$6.4
Anderson Varejao-$7
Brendon Haywood-$6.9
Kendrick Perkins-$6.4
Marcin Gortat-$6.3
Greg Oden-$6.7

So you’re not really getting very much for your money with true centers (and JO isn’t even a true center). I mean, Oden obviously is on a rookie contract and will make more than that, and it can be argued that Gortat and Perkins are pretty good deals, but Hibbert is better than pretty much all of them. Luckily he doesn’t have a case to make Dwight Howard/Andrew Bynum money, but he’s too good to be making too much less. With the economy, barring an astronomical improvement, I think we can sign him for around this amount and he’d have one of the best talent:contract ratios in the league. If you don’t believe that, who would you rather have who we wouldn’t have to overpay?

"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"

Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.

by LukeNukem on May 23, 2011 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

No offense

But the only guys on that list I think Hibbert is clearly better than is Diop and O’Neal. If Oden and Pryzbilla are healthy I think they’re definitely a better value than Hibbert as he is right now. Ditto for Perkins, Haywood, Varejao and Gortat.

There are really only two plays: Romeo and Juliet, and put the darn ball in the basket. ~Abe Lemons
Find me at IndyCornrows
and Hickory-High

by Ian Levy on May 23, 2011 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I love Hibbert as a person, a very high class young man

but we definitely give him too much props here. I hope he continues to develop, but I don’t ever think he will be as good as we hope.

"My game’s like the Pythagorean Theorem. It ain’t got no answer." - Shaq

Follow me on Twitter @JWM_IndySports

by bleedinblueandgold on May 23, 2011 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

And I agree with this list

other than Haywood, he seems to be past his better years. Two-three seasons ago, absolutely.

"My game’s like the Pythagorean Theorem. It ain’t got no answer." - Shaq

Follow me on Twitter @JWM_IndySports

by bleedinblueandgold on May 23, 2011 11:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

you people ask for the world

Roy Hibbert has been a success since the day the Pacers drafted him, to say that he has been a disappointment is just unfair the Hibbert. The Guy was drafted 17th overall and is already arguably in the top ten centers in the league. So much has been made about Roy’s weakness and to a lot of extant over overestimating those weaknesses. Hibbert has shown tremendeous improvement last season with his developemnt of vast array of finishing arsenals, though of course he’s no where near perfecting those moves as his disappoint statline would sugguest. But to simply give up on Hibbert this offseason is just based on lack of patience. Hibbert’s many critiques are based on his ‘softness’, which are largely untrue. Last season Roy Hibbert was a defensive key to every Pacers opponent as there are very few Centers that could match up with hibbert one on one, hence resulting in Hibbert recieving many double teams. There were a few players that Hibbert struggled with because they were physical and did not allow Hibbert to get to his sweet spot, but there are just only a handful of defenders that could do that to Hibbert. On the defense side of the ball, Roy Hibbert was the back bone of the Pacers, although he is no where near the athlete and caliber of someone like dwight howard, Roy Hibbert does his best to challenge every shot he could whenever the perimeter defense collapses and because of this the Pacers were fourth best in rim defense last season. And does anyone really believe the Pacers would be a 50+ team with Nene instead of Hibbert? come on.

by latrell spreewel on May 23, 2011 9:01 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree that Hib is not a disappointment at #17

But he can hardly be considered the “backbone” of our defense when he only averaged 27.7 min a game and even less that that in the playoffs. Backbones play 36 min minimum. Roy’s talent is nearly maxed out. Do you think he’ll increase his rebounding from 7.2 a game? No. Do you think his shooting will suddenly get better than 46%? Maybe, but that’s pretty low considering where the bulk of his shots are coming from.

Roy is a good player and a hard worker. However, he is not what we should be building our team around. If another legitimate center became available, we should jump on him.

by Drakul on May 23, 2011 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

i don't agree

From watching hibbert since he first came to the pacers, I can honestly say that despite his work ethic he has been put in a situation were it has been hard for him to play well and get playing time due to lack of a legit PF. Murphy is/was not legit, and neither are Mcbobs and Hans (event though they still have some growing to do themselves). Hibbert will never be dwight howard but he is still, at least, an average starting center, and most teams would kill for a guy like him with his production. I say we wait and see what he does when he has a fornt court partner who can defend and play in the post as well.

by Agent J on May 23, 2011 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

add some bulk and play under the right coach

Hibbert could be a 18 and 11 guy, I’m not kidding. Roy hibbert show A LOT of post moves last year, the versatility with a guy that’s 7’ 2" is SPECIAL. Dwight Howard WISHED he had roy’s skill sets, roy doesn’t need anymore skills, he just needs to perfect the ones he already have. BTW, Roy is already bulking and working on his midrange as we speak right now. And to be frankly honest, Roy’s work ethics are elite in the nba and that is a true leader for the Pacers, Roy is a positive influence to all the young players on the Pacers.

by latrell spreewel on May 23, 2011 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with all your character assessments of Big Roy

and he is very skilled, but he does not have the athletic ability or footwork to ever be a 18-11 man.

"My game’s like the Pythagorean Theorem. It ain’t got no answer." - Shaq

Follow me on Twitter @JWM_IndySports

by bleedinblueandgold on May 23, 2011 11:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hibs

I agree 18 and 11 might be a little too optimistic (though I’ll be rooting for it, Spree), but if Hibbert can make some more strides offensively, I could see him become a guy who can put up 16 and 7-8 with 1.5-2 blocks per game. Personally, I’d be thrilled if he ever reached that type of production. The key is for him to make those type of strides while becoming more efficient. I think he can do it too.

by Glenn A. on May 24, 2011 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wow, this generated a lot more discussion than I would have thought.

I guess what I was really getting at is that people seem to treat Hibbert’s starting position as a given. It’s assumed that if we can just pair him with the right front-court partner it will solve most of his problems. Like Count55 was saying, I think his problems run deeper than just who’s playing next to him. This may generate some disagreement, but I really like the Power Forward tandem of Hansbrough and McRoberts and thought we got a lot more consistent production out of the two of them then we did out of Hibbert. Neither is an all-star but both are capable, and fairly versatile. Now I feel like everyone is rushing to replace them in an effort to solve problems with Hibbert, problems that may not be solvable. Almost all of the discussion here the past two seasons about power forward production has seemed to focus on getting someone who can play with Hibbert. I’m not saying get rid of Hibbert, but maybe move him to the bench, still and don’t make him the centerpiece of the frontcourt.

I’d also like to state firmly that I love Hibbert and would love to him be a career Pacer. What he has done representing the team off the court, with Area55, etc. is so valuable. The production isn’t always there but he cares as much as anyone on the roster. As that was something this team was missing for a few years, I really appreciate seeing it in Hibbert.

There are really only two plays: Romeo and Juliet, and put the darn ball in the basket. ~Abe Lemons
Find me at IndyCornrows
and Hickory-High

by Ian Levy on May 23, 2011 1:20 PM EDT reply actions  

...
but I really like the Power Forward tandem of Hansbrough and McRoberts and thought we got a lot more consistent production out of the two of them then we did out of Hibbert

But neither of them can play center. Not even close. McRoberts was awful in limited time at C and Hansbrough never played there. Who do you suggest? As much as I agree with you that people overvalue Roy Hibbert and assume he just magically deserves PT, but come on, now! Since when is having a still-developing 7-footer with a reasonable contract a problem? Let his pay day come and DON’T overpay him. If you can get him to extend for a reasonable price, you do it. If not, that makes your decision for you. It shouldn’t affect the other players the team brings in. If Larry wants Nene he should get him, but no matter who he wants he should overpay NO ONE.

"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"

Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.

by LukeNukem on May 23, 2011 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

My point is not that we should get rid of him.

What I’m saying is that it seems the perception is that Hansbrough and McRoberts can’t work as a PF tandem because they don’t cover up Hibbert’s faults, (lack of post scoring, post defense, rebounding, etc.). My point is instead of getting rid of trying to replace McRoberts, maybe we should be looking for a starting center who compliments him and Hansbrough. I’m not saying we get rid of Hibbert, I’m happy to give him another season or two to develop. I just don’t think his starting spot should be a given.

I keep trying to clarify and muddying the waters instead. One more try: We don’t have the production we’d like at power forward or center. I think center is more of a problem. It seems weird that we only talk about fixing the problems at center by changing our power forward personnel. It seems like a roundabout way to solve the problem.

There are really only two plays: Romeo and Juliet, and put the darn ball in the basket. ~Abe Lemons
Find me at IndyCornrows
and Hickory-High

by Ian Levy on May 23, 2011 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think that the common perception

And I don’t know if this is accurate, is that our PFs are not as good at being starting PFs as Hibbert is at being a starting C.

"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"

Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.

by LukeNukem on May 23, 2011 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree that's the perception

I don’t think it’s accurate.

There are really only two plays: Romeo and Juliet, and put the darn ball in the basket. ~Abe Lemons
Find me at IndyCornrows
and Hickory-High

by Ian Levy on May 23, 2011 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Especially because I feel like most people evaluate Hansbrough and McRoberts as starters based on how they compliment Hibbert instead of just evaluating them as starters.

There are really only two plays: Romeo and Juliet, and put the darn ball in the basket. ~Abe Lemons
Find me at IndyCornrows
and Hickory-High

by Ian Levy on May 23, 2011 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hibbert CAN improve

It’s just about strength conditioning really. Yes he was statistically terrible. But there are moments when Roy looks like a legitimate top 10 center. His biggest problem is his lack of strength. He’s 7’2". A lot of guys in the NBA are going to have problems with 7’2". But they won’t have a problem if he can’t get deep position or back them down. He’s easy to push out and inevitably has to settle for jumpers, pass it off, and is in terrible rebounding position, hence his only 7.2 rebs/game.

If he can get stronger, especially in the lower body, I look to see improvement. If his frame can’t support it, then he will be maxed out because of his physical limitations. He has made great strides and I have no reason to think he won’t continue in those strides, but there is the possibility Hibbert will stay mostly where he is and the Pacers can’t live with that.

I had a dream last night that the Kid hit a home run...

by superkid20 on May 23, 2011 5:02 PM EDT reply actions  

Trust me. Roy knows his strength and conditioning were an issue. If you saw hm bust his but in the offseason, he’ll be doing it again this offseason if he hasn’t started already. Nene would be nice, but I say we see what Roy does next year. It typically takes centers time to develop. I think Roy will never be an all-star, but he’ll definitely be valuable down the road. He’s long as shit. He can block shots. He needs to hit the sled and do some squats, and that shot is coming along. You need to give him the resources to be successful, because it’s not everyday you get a long 7’2" center.

by hoosier3060 on May 23, 2011 5:48 PM EDT reply actions  

Roy Hibbert's rebounding

I can certainly entertain a realistic evaluation of Hibbert’s play and questions regarding his value as a starter. However it is not fair to say Roy doesn’t rebound, or he doesn’t play good defense.

Roy’s rebounds per 36 were 9.8 this season. If you pay attention you’ll notice Roy does a good job fighting for position and grabbing those rebounds. This brings me to my next point, and in no way am I judging Tyler or Josh merely as cover ups of Roy’s weaknesses. I’m calling specifically as they are.

Both Tyler and Josh absolutely refuse to box out and rebound. They just will not do it. They sit underneath the basket on nearly every play and wait for the ball to drop into their hands. Again this is just to be realistic. Your starting PF needs to be able to rebound at least a little bit,, yet Tyler acts as if he never heard of the concept of “boxing out.”

The team on a statistical level did rebound pretty decent this season. I think this is more a tribute to the wings rebounding well. Once in the playoffs our PF’s glaring weaknesses were exposed We go destroyed on the boards with both Boozer and Noah grabbing one offensive board after another. That is a direct reflection of Tyler’s refusal to rebound.

When it comes to defense Roy did a decent job playing one on one, he’s easily the only big on our team that knows how to rotate, and he did an excellent job blocking shots.

Roy doesn’t play great defense. But he does play good defense, and to act like he doesn’t i don’t think is for, or people just haven’t been paying attention.

The real problem with Roy is his absolutely offense. He needs to get consistent and stop turning the ball over. If he can continue to improve, like has every season, he’ll be a much higher value than Nene.

With that said, acquiring a starting center that can provide consistent play now at the position would be a smart move that could really help us this coming season. I would be all for it. But I’d like to once again point out, if the Pacers were to sign a starting center for us? We’d still have major problems at the PF spot with two non-defending, non-rebounding PF’s in Tyler and Josh…

[img]http://www.our2012sb.com/images/blogImage2_sm.jpg[/img]

by mattyl on May 23, 2011 6:23 PM EDT reply actions  

btw

I apologize for all of those spelling and grammar errors. It’s been a long day and I simply posted without editing…

Hopefully you can get the just of what I was trying to say.

[img]http://www.our2012sb.com/images/blogImage2_sm.jpg[/img]

by mattyl on May 23, 2011 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

I think our weaknesses were at the PF and SG spot. Hibbert was a problem too, but I am give him more leeway because centers, especially less athletic ones, take longer to develop. I’m not ready to abandon ship on Hib yet, but I still think the Pacers have to upgrade somewhere if they want to really compete in the East. Waiting on the core to develop is key, but there has to be more help somewhere.

by superkid20 on May 23, 2011 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hibbert's not athletic though...

How much longer are we giving him? I’m good with waiting him out until he expires, then see where we are from there, but an early extension like a lot of teams give their stud RFAs is out of the question at this point, if you ask me

"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"

Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.

by LukeNukem on May 23, 2011 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

To quote Mark Jackson, "At the end of the day"....

the Pacers have the financial flexibility to improve their roster and they should do so wherever value is given. It’s not a secret that the Pacers need scoring and I think that should be priority number one in their search for help.

While the Pacers don’t have a dominant rebounding big, we seem to forget that the team still finished in the top five in total rebounding. With wings such as Danny, PG, Dahntay, and Rush (if he is still around), there is a lot of help coming from the perimeter that can cover up some deficiencies.

I think Ian brings up a very interesting point in this article regarding Big Roy. I’ll be the first to admit that I never thought of adding a big without the intention of him playing next to Roy, but he wasn’t always successful on the court and I don’t think it just stems from having a lack of support from the PF position. While neither Hansbrough or McRoberts are technically sound rebounders, they both fight down low and provide value in other areas. I think it is very accurate that we tend ti belittle their contributions in order to put Roy on a pedestal.

I am a big fan of Nene and would love to see him in Blue and Gold next season. He may not work next to Roy but I think it’s foolish to think he wouldn’t increase productivity. I think if you swap Roy for Nene you instantly make the Pacers 6-10 wins better.

How about this idea to make the entire frontcourt more athletic:
- Sign Nene for 4-5 years for around $12-$13 million a year
- Trade Hibbert, Rush, Posey, the 15th pick, and 2012 first round pick (lottery protected) for Josh Smith, Pape Sy, the 48th pick, and 2012 second rounder

This would create a starting core of Collison, George, Danny, Smith, and Nene. All five players would be under contract for a while and the team could really develop as an Eastern Conference power for years to come.

By the way, if you haven’t checked out Ian’s blog, you need to do so. Great information and articles especially if you love to look at numbers.

"My game’s like the Pythagorean Theorem. It ain’t got no answer." - Shaq

Follow me on Twitter @JWM_IndySports

by bleedinblueandgold on May 24, 2011 12:23 AM EDT reply actions  

If that was possible, I'd do it in a heartbeat

I don’t know if its possible ha.

[link]http://intoxiwinningsports.tumblr.com/[/link]

by superkid20 on May 24, 2011 3:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Bad trade

I would not like the personnel proposed in this trade. Not competitively or from a character standpoint. First, this squad would not beat the Heat or Bulls, which has to be the main consideration in building the roster going forward. Second, the Pacers marketing team would find it more difficult to sell a talented team with questionable character. They have something they can sell now. A young roster filled with guys who may not have enough athleticism, but are high character guys. That is a consideration in rebuilding the fan base.
As far as the trade goes:
The 48th pick. useless. That pick would have little chance to make the roster.
Pape Sy? Didn’t know there was such a person.
Josh Smith, athletic? yes. A winner? not yet. Team player? not yet.
Nene, talented. But not a good value at 13 million when you consider Roy makes $4. Rush makes 4. Posey goes off the books next year, which would add 7 million of capspace. We can get a rotation power forward, maybe a starter, at pick 15 this year. You want to trade away the pick in the deep draft of 2012?
I like Roy Hibbert, his upside, his contract, his work ethic. I like Roy Hibbert as a person. That is worth something to me. Rush is a good value at $4 million and deserves a chance to either blossom or fizzle out and not have his contract renewed. Rush has his issues, but has redeemable qualities as well. I like who the Pacers are. Don’t trade character away for athletic ability. You don’t get equal value.

by thomasezekiel77 on May 24, 2011 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Roy will be fine, but not Dwight...

It’s gonna take 2 years before Roy reaches his potential, whatever that may be. Roy is not gonna be Dwight Howard, but he can reach Bynum/Perkins/Brad Miller/Ilgauskas levels. I mention those guys b/c they took 3-4 years to fully develop and find their niche. I think that whomever we hire as coach (Vogel or Brown hopefully) will understand what Roy needs to do and how they can use his height, skill set, and enthusiasm for the game.

Also factor in his health. Bigs who can play 70 games a season are hard to find. Of course, anything can happen at any time, but all things equal, I’d rather keep him. Plus, there’s always that fear that he puts it all together, figures it all out, then spends his prime years balling out, and we basically develop him for another team to use.

I think now, with more emphasis on getting to the hoop with Danny, Darren, Paul, Lance (if he makes it), and Tyler bulldogging his way in, Roy’s size and length on tip-ins will become a major part of the offense. Also, his hook shot is gonna become automatic the more he works, and he’s gonna understand how to use it to set up other facets of his game (up-and-under, passing to cutters, passing to open shooters, drawing fouls, etc.).

I just think the positives outweigh the bad right now. Potential, good lockerroom guy, good fan support, and I believe on the cusp of really becoming a consistent, steady player, now that he’s away from O’Brien and will have a coach who can use his skill set to fit within the team.

by abeas1 on May 24, 2011 10:05 AM EDT reply actions  

I know I'm in the minority

But I want no part of Josh Smith. Absolutely none. He’s easily among my least favorite players in the league. It’s intensely frustrating watching him do so little with so much. I can’t imagine how frustrated I would be if he was actually on a team that I root for.

There are really only two plays: Romeo and Juliet, and put the darn ball in the basket. ~Abe Lemons
Find me at IndyCornrows
and Hickory-High

by Ian Levy on May 24, 2011 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not in the minority

Alot of analysis and discussion of the Hawks in the playoffs revolved around Josh Smith’s shot selection. He was getting better results for his team by playing on the low post. But he continued to take jump shots. He is extremely athletic and a locker room leader. But considering what he will be paid, not worth it. We need players who put team first.

by thomasezekiel77 on May 24, 2011 2:25 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Indiana Pacers. Email: indycornrows@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

D_oh_small
Question for Cornrowers...not Heat vs. Pacers related.

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Miami Heat are the Perfect Example as to Why Fans Should Boycott the NBA
Small
PACER PRIDE???
Bcampheadshot2_small
On Flagrant Fouls and Soft Play
Small
Game 5
1565007530_small
Devil's Take - Pacers dry up, Heat steal one
Small
Wade aging quickly and gracelessly - Bill Reiter, Foxsports
Small
How to improve on game 3
Small
Colin Cowherd- TOTALLY DISRESPECTED THE PACERS, THE CITY AND OUR FANS!!!!!!!!!! (NOT RIGHT)
1565007530_small
Devil's Take - Swagger On, Heat Off
Imagescaphwx17_small
Confusion??

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

Iclogo_new_small Tom Lewis

Editor

Core_small Nathan S.

Authors

The_outside_world_small Ian Levy

Small Glenn A.