Now that we have West,
how does Indy fare up against the other Central Division teams? What seed are we going to get in the East? Granting that we get another center like Kwame Brown or any third stringer center who can back up Roy Hibbert and Jeff Foster, what are the chances that we will do a lot of damage in the east?
As of the moment, I think our line-up would look like this:
Collison / Hill / Price / Lance
George / Hill / Rush / D. Jones / Lance
Granger / George / Posey
West / Hansbrough / Pendergraph / Posey
Hibbert / Foster / Kwame or another 3rd stringer
In my opinion, that would make some noise. Just not sure how loud that noise would be. Hopefully, loud enough to get us to the East Finals.
Collison Chalmers Rondo Rose
George Wade Allen Evans
Granger VS. James or VS. Pierce or Vs. Deng
West Bosh Garnett Boozer
Hibbert Anthony J. O. Noah
Bench:
Hill / Hansbrough / Battier / Miller / Green / Bass / Korver / Gibson
29 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Apologies for this:
what i wrote was Indy would have a line-up like this with tyler and hill as main weapons coming off the bench while these other teams would look like this:
Collison Chalmers Rondo Rose
George Wade Allen Evans
Granger James Pierce Deng
West Bosh Garnett Boozer
Hibbert Anthony J. O. Noah
Bench:
Hill Battier Green Korver
Hansbrough Miller Bass Gibson
guess it still didn't work
Indiana
Collison
George
Granger
West
Hibbert
Hansbrough
HIll
Miami
Chalmers
Wade
James
Bosh
Anthony
Miller
Battier
Boston
Rondo
Allen
Pierce
Garnett
J. O.
Bass
Green
Chicago
Rose
Evans
Deng
Boozer
Noah
Korver
Gibson
Seriously, what is it with people on this web site
There is something in this country called innocent until proven guilty. Furthermore, the damn charges were dropped; he wasn’t even tried so there didn’t even have to be a presumption of innocence. He’s certainly no choir boy, but who are all the angels on this site who feel free to pass judgement on a guy about a case for which he was never tried?. Get over your purity; it’s bloody annoying.
by pendulum55 on Dec 12, 2011 12:26 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs
OJ would like to have a word with you.
In all seriousness, I don’t think Lance was guilty from the start.
"A champion is someone who gets up when he can't."
- Jack Dempsey
by infinityzero.systemerror on Dec 12, 2011 2:49 AM EST up reply actions
In case it wasn't obvious.
I’m talking about OJ Simpson, not OJ Mayo
"A champion is someone who gets up when he can't."
- Jack Dempsey
by infinityzero.systemerror on Dec 12, 2011 5:01 AM EST up reply actions
I think
It gives a good shot to win the Central Division, as long as West returns to pre-injury form. The Bulls are obviously the team to beat right now, so let’s compare starting line-ups.
Collison v Rose
Ok, obviously Rose has the huge advantage here, no need to talk it over at all.
Advantage-Bulls
George v Evans
Even without growth, i believe George to be the better of the 2, then you add his expected growth from year 1 to 2, then
Advantage-Pacers
Granger v Deng
This is a fairly close one, and i may be biased, but i’d have to give it to Granger. Deng is better defensively(though maybe by less, depending on how much effort Granger puts on the defensive end this year, now that he wont be our only scoring option), but Granger is a legitmate 20ppg scorer, a player that defenses HAVE to key on. Also, everything points to Granger going back to his all-star year form, as he has put it a TON of effort this past offseason…well, for him.
Advantage-Pacers
West v Boozer
Before, with Hansbrough starting, Boozer obviously had the advantage. But now with West, assuming he returns to pre-injury form, i believe we have our own, better, version of Boozer. An 18-8 guy, slightly less than Boozer’s 20-10, but he plays better defense(not saying much, as Boozer doesnt play defense). Plus, he doesnt go into hibernation in the playoffs.
Advantage-Pacers
Hibbert v Noah
Even though i fully expect Hibbert to continue to improve, i just cant put him on Noah’s level yet. Noah is an anchor defensively, a great rebounder, and his offense isnt too bad either.
Advantage-Bulls
That gives the Pacers a 3-2, positional advantage. This is without even taking into account the bench, which the Pacers have one of the deepest benches in the NBA, and that will hopefully only improve as free agency continues. So i fully expect the Pacers to be a contender in the Central division, and as such, the Eastern Conference this year.
But
It could just be my homerism speaking in that entire post. :D
Coach...Bench...fact that the Bulls are used to winning?
I think those all deserve categories, right? If it were as simple as whose starters were better then whose, wouldn’t Miami have won it pretty easily last year?
"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"
Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.
Thibs is good, but not sure it's that huge a difference from Vogel
As for the bench, I’d be willing to say the Pacers may have an advantage there as well. Rose is obviously phenominal, but seeing the lineups stack up makes me feel a lot better about this team.
i think the bulls could be had.
granger was right before. shut down rose (very difficult) and you shut down the bulls. now that we have george and hill to alternate on rose, we have a better chance at beating them.
ny has good starters but not a deep bench. plus, anthony and amare are known chokers. tyson does not have an offensive game other than an alley oop.
it’s the heat and the savvy celtice that worry me. heat have the tools now with battier and if they get a good center, it’s going to be more difficult than before. celtics are too experienced especially in the post season.
Guys...
We won once in five. I know some games were close, but that’s probably just as much a product of them overlooking us then us “matching up well,” or whatever. Let’s get a better seed than #8, and then we’ll talk about who we can beat. I’m not saying the team isn’t capable of big things, but the Bulls were the winningest team in the league last year for a reason.
"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"
Come visit The Fantasy Ninjas. We'd love to hear from you.
thank you very much
finally, an answer or opinion to my post and not some….well, something entirely unrelated
I think we would rank...
5th in the Eastern conference. 4th, depending on who else we pick up in a trade or free agency. So my Eastern Conference power ranking would look like this.
1. Miami Heat
2. Chicago Bulls
3. New York Knicks
4. Boston Celtics
5. Indiana Pacers
6. Atlanta Hawks
7. Orlando [Depending on Dwight Howard trade]
8. Milwaukee Bucks
We could even be as high as #3..
With the season set up the way it is, Boston and New York may have trouble playing strong through the season. Boston’s really old, New York’s counting on Amare staying healthy and productive. Neither team has much depth. If there’s a team that benefits from such a rugged schedule, it’s the Pacers.
I can’t believe I’m saying this, and a lot would need to go right, but the Blue and Gold could get home court advantage for the 1st round of the playoffs… Sweet.
not unless we beat the bulls for the division.
Or did that change in the cba?
"A champion is someone who gets up when he can't."
- Jack Dempsey
by infinityzero.systemerror on Dec 12, 2011 9:38 AM EST up reply actions
giving knicks way too much credit, they got swept out of the playoffs
the Celtics are old. Hawks have serious turmoil on their team. I think we can be the anywhere from 3rd to 5th. Plus don’t sleep on the Nets, they might have a say in the east.
by latrell spreewel on Dec 12, 2011 11:06 AM EST up reply actions
i prefer to play the bulls
mail=nly because we have a better chance against them than boston or miami. as for ny, see my opinion above
i think we're better than NY.
they may have good starters especially anthony, amare and t. chandler but their bench is not better than ours.
Yeah
I feel the same. I think we can mess around and get 3rd, because we upgraded so much. And we aren’t done.
Chandler has zero offense, Hibbert is better than Chandler
Amare’s and Melo’s defense are very questionable. They have no point guard at this point after waving Billups. Pacers are definitely better.
by latrell spreewel on Dec 12, 2011 11:03 AM EST up reply actions
Don't agree
Just because a guy may have more all-around skills doesn’t automatically make him better. Chandler is such a a good defender it often makes up for his deficiencies. You can’t say that about any aspect of Roy’s game because he spends so much time being so darn inconsistent. Chandler’s problem has been and always will be health. I’d take Hibbert over Chandler right now because he’s cheaper, and hopefully still improving, but putting those things aside, if you’re asking me strictly who the better player is, I’d give the nod to Chandler. He’s far more consistent, and so effective on one side of the ball, he often changes the nature of games.
Totally agree
However, I think Big Roy finally has his break out year.
what we should do as of now
1. Make trade for Mayo
2.Trade Brandon Rush and 2nd round pick to anyone, for ANYTHING
3. Amnesty James Posey
4. Waive A.J. Price
5. Sign Carl Landry and Hilton Armstrong
6. Sign Michael Redd(preferred 1 year deal so he can prove his worth to the league)
The reason why we trade brandon rush and amnesty James Posey will be merely for roster space, and a little more cap room to pick up Landry and Redd. At the same time, we get a decent sized center in Hilton Armstrong who could be a nice back-up in case one of our centers goes out with an injury.
If we went through with this, our line-up would look like:
Collison / Hill / Stephenson
Mayo / George / Redd / Hill / Stephenson / Jones
Granger / George / Jones / Redd
West / Hansbrough / Landry / Pendergraph
Hibbert / Foster / Armstrong
Our roster would be set at 15 with this line-up. Obviously some concerns are apparent, including the fact that we’d be short at the SF position, which could put a damper on our defensive abilities towards players like Lebron James, Melo, and Kevin Durant who all play at that position. Never the less, I still think we’d be able to put up pretty good fights and become an incredibly good team with these type of players
Lineups are sexy to talk about, but winning is about all about collective team effort
the biggest question is can this young team sustain the effort through the entire team from starters to the bench through times good and times bad. How will Vogel and Braian Shaw with the rest of the coaching staff implement their offense and defense, and will it eb an effective system. How good can this team be on defense as a unit. Those questions will decide the Pacer’s success more than individual success.
by latrell spreewel on Dec 12, 2011 11:11 AM EST reply actions
I would rather
we pickup McRoberts than Landry. Signing Redd for a year would be a great move..

by 

























