Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Why We're Skeptical Of LeBron James

FIBA World Championship Experience Gives Granger A Golden Opportunity To Improve NBA Game

Danny Granger can raise his NBA game after spending the summer with Team USA.

The opportunity to practice this summer with Team USA leading up to the FIBA World Championship seemed like a boon for Danny Granger back when it was announced in February.

Working out with some of the league's best players and the USA Basketball coaching staff was a great alternate offseason program to help Granger improve his game and prepare for the upcoming season. Shortly after the workouts began, though, with many big-name players sitting out the summer and other players dropping out due to injury, Granger found himself in the mix for the final 12-man roster that would compete in Turkey.

Once on the team, Granger had a legitimate shot at playing a significant role as well, joining Andre Iguodala and Rudy Gay in a quest for forward minutes alongside Kevin Durant. But aside from an offensive outburst of 22 points in an exhibition against China, Granger's offensive production ranged from inconsistent to minimal. Since scoring the bucket is his calling card and coach Mike Krzyzewski and staff put an emphasis on defensive pressure, Granger morphed into the odd man out in the playing rotation once the games started to count.

Save for some blow-out run and mop-up minutes, Granger spent his time in Turkey supporting teammates from the bench. From a fan perspective, it was disappointing to watch, knowing Granger could jump in the action and light up the scoreboard if given the chance, even though the situation was reasonable from an objective, basketball perspective.

Zooming out to appreciate the bigger picture though, reveals plenty of benefits that the Pacers forward can bring with him to the Fieldhouse when training camp begins in a few weeks. It was truly a golden opportunity for Granger to improve as a player, leader and teammate. After the jump, more on what Granger can take away from his experience with Team USA this summer.

Star-divide

Leadership

Danny Granger spent the better part of two months enmeshed in a tight-knit group that included several strong leaders. The most obvious among the group was Nuggets' point guard Chauncey Billups who has run championship teams and always relished the chance to kill off an opponent.

Granger also took in a different type of team leader in Kevin Durant. He's young and unassuming, quick to make sure everyone knows he's part of a team and the team comes first. But when it was time to lead Team USA on the court, Durant took his game to another level. He may kill 'em with kindness, but Durant was lethal as he seized the medal round by the throat.

Gaining the perspective of a different coaching staff should also benefit Granger in the long run. Coach K and Jim Boeheim are highly successful coaches who have led a wide-variety of players to strong results for many years. Nate McMillan is as tough-minded a coach as he was a player and has led quite well in both roles. Having these guys coaching up Granger and offering him a different perspective than the Pacers' staff is a huge benefit.

Talent and Competition

From the start of the Team USA camp in Las Vegas, Granger was subject to stiff competition with some of the NBA's best young players. A daily chance to see where you measure up while getting in game shape, not summer shape, should prove far more beneficial than the offseason run Granger would normally get in Los Angeles or Vegas.

Since it is safe to assume that Granger's defensive prowess, or lack thereof, was the most glaring reason he ended up in a 12th man role, it doesn't mean Granger didn't have the opportunity to improve his defense immensely with Team USA. When defense is an emphasis and competitive NBA players are vying for playing time, there's going to be some strong defensive effort dished out in practice. Considering how well Iguodala showed up on the defensive end in Istanbul, Granger could've improved his defense drastically and still not reached the level of Iggy.

Any defensive improvement will be welcomed and applying the lessons learned from the coaching staff and competition with Team USA should show up when Granger dons the blue and gold.

Humble Pie

Yes, it was nice to make the 12-man roster after initial expections were minimal, but Danny Granger is considered one of the top players in the NBA and among the elite offensive players, averaging over 24 points per game the past two seasons. No matter how good of a face he put on, sitting through so many minutes of big games on the bench had to frustrate Granger.

A little slice of humble pie may be good for Granger. He's been riding pretty high since bursting onto the scene as an All-Star two years ago. Big new contract. Summers in L.A. All of the celebrity trappings there for the taking. But in Istanbul, respected basketball people let him know he wasn't quite good enough to play a big role.

To fully digest that pie, Granger has to look in the mirror instead of looking for excuses for why he didn't play. Take the constructive criticism to fuel an effort to show the world that he's plenty good enough by getting it done at both ends of the court in the NBA.

All Worth It

In the end, Danny Granger's Team USA experience was full of ups and downs, challenges, disappointments and ultimately excitement as he bounced up and down with teammates after securing a gold medal. From a selfish standpoint, Granger paid a small physical price while packing all of these varied experiences and development into his bag of tricks. No need to worry about the summer work leaving Granger worn out for the start of the season either since he was so lightly used over the final two weeks.

So the experience was great for Granger's development as a player and leader and thus great for the Pacers. The critics can minimize Granger's impact at the world championship or complain about his game's deficiencies, but as this sweet photo shows, they can never take away his gold medal nor the basketball experience of a lifetime.

Comment 15 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

My biggest disappointment

Well, other than Danny being the 12th man, is the lack of local coverage of Danny being on Team USA. It seems like NO ONE knows, Eric Gordon got more local pub.

٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶ The sky is falling!

by IndyPacers on Sep 14, 2010 11:30 PM EDT reply actions  

Nice article Tom...

…great points and well written.

Confucious say "He who dives for loose balls need proper fitting athletic cup!"

by Wise Master on Sep 14, 2010 11:43 PM EDT reply actions  

I wish he would have played more, but as a selfish pacer fan I am glad he didn’t put the milage on his somewhat fragile body.

probably heard defense defense defense over there.. comes back to “shoot 3’s!!!!” over here.

by dbcb on Sep 15, 2010 6:57 AM EDT reply actions  

SI Article: Danny Granger Tanks in FIBA Play

Danny Granger Tanks in FIBA Play –

Just criticism – Granger heads the Losers List!!!

I hope he ends up being our #3 or #4 option this year – behind Hibbert, Collson, and (hopefully) George or a TBD PF stud we land in a trade… Danny needs to get his head out of the bat cave and pay attention to business!!!

by FortWayneKarl on Sep 15, 2010 10:17 AM EDT reply actions  

You’re a little misleading there. He leads the list ahead of the goaltending rule, and all it says is Coach K couldn’t find a good role for him. Thats not much of a criticism. No way he is the #3 or #4 option on the team this year. He is still our best player, and I think that sitting on the bench for the worlds was the best thing for him. I hope George is that good early too, but we need to have some realistic expectations. Remember he is a rookie from Fresno State. He has talent and is very likeable, but the NBA is going to be different than what he saw in the WAC. Hopefully he will get a lot of good experience this year, but he is most likely a year or two away.

by donnyfher on Sep 15, 2010 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

If our best player can’t get off the bench for our World’s “B” Team – then the Pacers need a new “best player”! I’m hoping at a minimum that Collison and Hibbert become our 1-2 punch with Danny as a solid #3 option. If so (assuming JOB gets the heck out of the way) – then this team can make the playoffs… Danny has “blossomed” the last few years, while the team has tanked – he’s not the leader we need for a return to elite status the Pacers once held.

by FortWayneKarl on Sep 15, 2010 10:44 AM EDT reply actions  

This doesn't make any sense...

You don’t just anoint a new “best player,” they have to earn it on the court.

I love Hibbert’s game and think he’s a fine player but I don’t see him surpassing Granger’s production this year or significantly improving his poor rebounding statistics. He’s still growing as a player and I believe that he will accomplish better rebounding totals in time, but I don’t see it happening this year.

Collison is a good player and can get penetration, but his primary value from that point is as a passer not a scorer.

I just don’t see what you could’ve seen from watching these players to make you think that they could contribute more than Granger this year. Granger has blossomed as an offensive player. If his time with team USA has helped him improve his defense even slightly and he can stay healthy this year, then the team will look better in spots but I think we still struggle a bit. Collison should help the offense get back to scoring at a healthier clip but I think this squad is still weak defensively and will be looking for a pf in the draft next summer.

We have a good young core though and Granger has a good window of time left. I think we have a remote chance to compete for an 8 seed this year (But I hope we don’t because I think JOB’s time here is over), but next year we should be a team capable of maybe even winning a playoff series.

by INDIANABANNER on Sep 15, 2010 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Granger Regressed

Granger regressed on defense last year, and even the last last 2-3 years from where he was. Forget improving – he just needs to get back to where he was! My point is IF Danny averages in the high teens scoring and then Hibbert and Collison average about that or better – then we have a definite chance to become a playoff team. If JOB game plans that we we will rely on Granger jacking threes at a record pace (which he was doing until he got injured last year) – then we will suck yet again!

by FortWayneKarl on Sep 15, 2010 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Of course...

You don’t just say who your “best player” is… I’m just saying that Granger can’t be our best player if we expect to make any noise in the playoffs this next season. Also, JOB can’t make our offense revolve around Granger either. If Granger subjugates his stats (scoring) to being a team player and once again playing some “D”, and JOB (idiot that he is) stops making our offense revolve around Granger throwing up 3’s from 5 feet beyond the arc, then we develop (and game plan) around a more conventional point guard distributing to offensive sets (instead of making everyone run up and down the floor like idiots and jacking up 3’s) and actually use Hibbert in the post (he’s 7’ freakin’ 2"!), then Hibbert continues to improve and Collison performs anything like he did last year, then there’s some hope for our own “Big 3” – otherwise, we will suck if JOB isn’t smart enough to do this (or doesn’t have Bird hammer this into his head or fire the SOB?!!???!!!)!!!!

by FortWayneKarl on Sep 15, 2010 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

The change ofJOB's system will not occur.

Sure we could still see a “Big 3” develop, but there’s a reason is the #1 option on the team. He can score and, yes, he does take a lot of 3’s, makes a lot too, but that isn’t his whole game. DG has a great jump shot and can hit from anywhere on the court. Roy will almost certainly improve, but not to the point of being the guy on offense. Also, Collison is a solid player, but not the guy either, nor do I want him to be. It seems like the teams that rely on their PG to be their #1 scoring option haven’t been all that successful in the playoffs, not saying it can’t work, but it seems to be less than ideal. I think you want a guy like Granger to be your number #1 option in the NBA of today. A long, athletic, scoring SF seems to be ideal at this point in time. Although, it would be nice if Granger could have the advantage of having to score less and being able to offer more energy at the other end of the court because his teammates are finally helping him out.

by infinityzero.systemerror on Sep 16, 2010 1:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

FIBA isn’t the NBA. Quit comparing the two.

Granger is MUCH MUCH better than Rudy Gay in the NBA. MUCH.

Rudy Gay played more in FIBA.

Granger is arguably (and really, if you use stats it isn’t arguably) a better player than Iggy in the NBA.

Yet Iggy started in FIBA play.

The “a team” small forwards last year were James and Anthony. Of course he wouldn’t make that team. Durant was THE small forward this year. Of course he wouldn’t play over him.

We have the 4th or 5th (depending on your views of wallace) small forward in the league. Don’t forget that just because of a FIBA tournament that =/= the NBA.

by dbcb on Sep 15, 2010 7:53 PM EDT reply actions  

You missed my points...

If Granger is our best player we won’t ever make any noise in the playoffs. Danny has forgotten how to spell “D”, that’s why coach K benched him. Collison and Hibbert should be who we run our offense thru – not Granger.

by FortWayneKarl on Sep 15, 2010 11:14 PM EDT reply actions  

We won’t make any noise in the playoffs because we have no talent. That isn’t all on Granger.

His defense isn’t great but how bad it is is getting greatly exaggerated. Hell, his defensive rating is better than igudola who everyone is in love with right now. and it is better than carmelos who doesn’t even know what defense is.

You can’t expect a player to have to shoulder all the load on offense and then turn around a be a defensive stopper every possession. You can’t. It is too much. They wear down. Even people like Kobe or Tmac in his prime played defensive in the fourth quarter or towards the end of games.

Can we win a championship with Danny as our best player? Not likely unless we go with the Detroit model. Is that a slam on Danny? Not really… teams that win championships have HOF caliber players on their team.

by dbcb on Sep 16, 2010 8:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Collison + Hibbert > Granger

Barring injuries and extended irrational JOB benchings, it wouldn’t surprise me to see Collison and Hibbert both ranked higher by Kelly Dwyer at their respective positions come end of next season than Granger is.

by FortWayneKarl on Sep 16, 2010 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Indiana Pacers. Email: indycornrows@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

D_oh_small
Question for Cornrowers...not Heat vs. Pacers related.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Game 5
1565007530_small
Devil's Take - Pacers dry up, Heat steal one
Small
Wade aging quickly and gracelessly - Bill Reiter, Foxsports
Small
How to improve on game 3
Small
Colin Cowherd- TOTALLY DISRESPECTED THE PACERS, THE CITY AND OUR FANS!!!!!!!!!! (NOT RIGHT)
1565007530_small
Devil's Take - Swagger On, Heat Off
Imagescaphwx17_small
Confusion??
Small
We Need Larry Bird for One More Year
Small
All i Can say is WOW
One-ugly-dog-a78_small
My Email to the NBA (Wade-Collison foul)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

Iclogo_new_small Tom Lewis

Editor

Core_small Nathan S.

Authors

The_outside_world_small Ian Levy

Small Glenn A.