Trade Idea!! Can This work???

the Pacers would receive, but it just seems way to one-sided. Not sure why those teams would do the trades.

You have to think from the opposing team’s perspective for anyone to take these trade ideas seriously. It’s nice to dream, but on what planet are any of these ideas fair and doable?

Trade 1-Dunleavy, Ford, Murphy and Foster, financially, equal about $36 mil. Crawford, Horford and Smith equal about $27 mil. So let’s just say you really mean you want to trade Ford, Murphy and Foster ($26 ish) for those three. OR you want to trade Murphy and Foster (or Ford and Dunleavy) for Horford and Smith. Why would Atlanta give up either (let alone one) of their two best players along with a $10 million expiring contract (who happens to be a pretty valuable sixth man) for what amounts to expiring contracts? That’s like saying if we both had cars that we’d bought for the same amount, only I’d totaled mine in an accident, you’d still be willing to swap me car for car (and even toss me some cash to do some upgrades).

Trade 2-This one you’d have to add DeSagana Diop and Matt Carroll to the deal to make it match financially (and make sense…those are the Bobcats’ only two bad contracts). Then, it sort of makes sense. If they really want to rebuild, or blow up, or something, they could look to dump all three of their long-term deals (not counting Tyrus Thomas, who they just signed) for expiring contracts, but they’d have to be desperate to save money for some reason. And I don’t see why they would. They’ll be up against the cap next year, but giving up their only All-Star doesn’t seem like a feasible way to get away from that situation. I would love Wallace, if we could find a position for him, and I’d even take back bad deals to get him. I just don’t know if Charlotte would bite.

Trade 3-Eh, I commented on this one on your other fanpost.

So definetely from an outside perspective I’d say no for the other teams