Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Reviewing the Pacers' Free Agent Class of 2009

With everyone buzzing about the Free Agent class available this summer, I thought it might be worthwhile to look back at how the Pacers did last year. Going into last summer, our stated goals of free agency were to upgrade the team's defense and find a back-up point guard to replace Jarrett Jack. Backcourt minutes that went to Marquis Daniels last year needed to be filled as well. Serious financial constraints created a need for small, short contracts. Potential trades scenarios with Boston and others popped up and then disappeared. In the end the Pacers brought in 4 players:

Obviously, the season didn't turn out as hoped in terms of wins and losses. Any evaluation of these players needs to be tempered by the lack of team success. After the jump let's try to tease out the individual contributions of each of these players, and the value the Pacers received by signing them.

Star-divide

The first metric I looked at was Win Shares. This is a statistic with its supporters and detractors, but it is an easy way to assign a numeric value to a player's overall contribution to the team. The nice thing is that a player's Win Score, when combined with their teammates, will correlate closely with the actual Win Total for their team. For example, the Win Shares for all the Pacers this year total 33.9. As I'm sure everyone remembers, the team finished with 32 actual wins. For more information on Win Shares and how it is calculated check out this article at Basketball Reference.   

To begin, I put together a simple table, comparing each new Pacer's Win Shares for this season to the salary that they were paid. With the goal of keeping salaries down this can give us an idea of how much production the team got for their money.

Player Win Shares '09-'10 Salary $ Per Win Share

Dahntay Jones

1.8

2,500,000.00

1,388,888.89

Earl Watson

2.6

2,800,000.00

1,076,923.08

Luther Head

0.6

884,881.00

1,474,801.67

Solomon Jones

0.8

1,620,000.00

2,025,000.00

           
Obviously, the Win Share totals put up by these four are limited by the minutes they played. The Pacers won 32 games this year with a total payroll of $66,914,689. This means they spent an average of $2,091,084 per win. To put this into context, the most efficient franchise this season was the Oklahoma City Thunder, who spent an average of $1.12 million per win. The four least efficient franchises were the Nets, Timberwolves, Wizards and Knicks; who spent an average of $6.01 million, $4.19 million, $2.85 million and $2.81 million respectively (These numbers come from a great piece by Ian Thomsen, found here). Although Watson, Head and the Joneses didn't provide much in terms of win quantity, their value seems to compare favorably to the rest of the roster and the league in general.        

As I mentioned above, the other idea was to maintain future flexibility by signing players to shorter contracts. Luther Head was signed to a 1-yr. deal, and will most likely be gone next year. Dahntay Jones has 3 more years left on his deal, and will be 33 by the time it expires. At this point in his career, he is a known commodity, and it is not likely the Pacers will benefit from a spike in his skill development. Even so, if he can maintain his production from this season, and become a more consistent outside shooter, then I think his signing is a net positive for the team. He plays hard every night and seems willing to fill whatever role he is asked to fill. His defense wasn't as good as advertised but he certainly doesn't hurt the team in this area.

When looking at the contract lengths for Solomon Jones and Watson, things become a little more murky. The plan was for T.J. Ford to return to form this season and for A.J. Price to develop into a solid back-up. Unfortunately, Ford's production fell off a cliff, and Watson played well in assuming the starting role. As Ford will most likely pick up his player option for next year, the team is left in a complicated situation heading into the summer. Price is not ready to be a starting point guard. Except for John Wall, who is likely out of reach, the draft is painfully thin at point guard. Unless they want to go back to Ford, which I doubt, the Pacers are left needing to add a starting point guard in free agency. There are several options available; Luke Ridnour, Raymond Felton, going back to Watson, and others. My concern is that after strong seasons, players like these will be looking for solid raises and the security of longer contracts. If the Pacers had gotten a 2-yr. deal with Watson last season they would be all set. Instead, they face the possibility of paying significantly more for similar production to what they received this year.

My opinion on Solomon Jones' contract is polar opposite to Watson's. I don't understand the thinking of locking him up for 2-yrs. Entering last season the Pacer's frontcourt rotation was slated to include Roy Hibbert, Jeff Foster, Troy Murphy, Tyler Hansbrough, and Josh McRoberts. I have no problem with adding Jones. He is athletic and had shown some defensive potential. It was possible he would bloom with increased playing time. The move should have been to sign him for a year, and see what happened. Instead, we head towards next season with an improved Hibbert, a healthy Foster, a healthy Hansbrough, Murphy, a greatly improved McRoberts, and a likely first round draft pick. Minutes are going to be hard to come by and Jones' salary will probably bring minimal production.

In retrospect, the Pacers did a decent job working within their limitations last summer. Their free agent additions provided value for the dollars spent. With a little foresight Watson could have gotten a 2-yr deal and Solomon Jones a 1-yr. deal. Despite this flaw, they didn't drastically overpay or overextend anyone, maintaining some flexibility for this summer and next. There were no home runs, but it was clear from the beginning that they weren't swinging for the fences. The key will be to take these same lessons into their free agent search this summer. Don't overspend. Look for value. Maintain flexibility.  

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Hopefully we take a better tact this year

More young high upside prospects snd less 30 year old journeymen.

" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico loose a ball in the Sun? "

by aaronb on Apr 22, 2010 1:32 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

You may get your wish ab

unless a miracle trade occurs, the Pacers will only have room to add the rookies they take in the draft.

by Tom Lewis on Apr 22, 2010 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Can we do both?

I think we could benefit from an upgrade in both the talent AND the veteran leadership department. There is young upside available this year, talent that we might actually have a chance of signing. I’m talking about players like Amir Johnson, Ian Mahimini, and Travis Outlaw. My nightmare scenario is overreacting and taking on one of them on a silly contract in terms of dollars or years. I agree we need more talent but I don’t want to overpay for it.

The players we added last summer didn’t have a huge impact in improving the team this year. I do think that we got good value for the amount of money we spent. The Ian Thomsen article I linked is definitely worth reading. The contrast between the five most efficient and the five least efficient franchises is pretty striking. From my perspective, the Timberwolves, Wizards and especially the Knicks are teams that have pursued upside regardless of the price or length of contracts. More often than not, it hasn’t worked out leaving them with huge holes in their finances and competitiveness. I think we should be emulating franchises like OKC and Portland, who are constantly balancing the talent coming in with the money they are paying out.

by Ian Levy on Apr 22, 2010 2:30 PM EDT reply actions  

I hate to sound like Debbie Downer

I just think the Pacers should go after younger, higher upside guys. If we were close to competing for something, then I could understand the vet target approach.

However the reality is that we are a bottom 5 talent team. We should be targeting failed prospects who can still pan out.

 Acie Law
Rodney Carney
Marcus Willisms
Sheldon Williams
Joe Alexander
Hakim Warrick

Those are the types of guys we need to target. Not 30 plus point guards that are known to be servicable. How does Earl Watson help us in 2014?

" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico loose a ball in the Sun? "

by aaronb on Apr 22, 2010 3:14 PM EDT reply actions  

Yep

We’re a long way away from being able to add veterans that can actually do anything for this team. They only work when they’re surrounded by winners, and we don’t have winners…yet. I’d love to see Rodney Carney make his way over here. Rodney or Law would be great. Get a couple of guys like them and then you can start adding the vets.

by blueandgold24 on Apr 24, 2010 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

$ per win share is a little flawed.

It’s always to look back and evaluate moves made by the team but I think the analysis is a little flawed because Dahntay Jones and Earl Watson played many more minutes than Solomon and Luther Head (Dahntay played more than 3x the minutes that Solomon did). You might say, well they played more so they were more valuable but this discrepancy was caused more by the weakness of the Pacers’ backcourt. You could plug a D-league callup in, pay him the minimum and have him play 40 mins. a game (a la Golden State) and his $ per win share would look good regardless of how well he played.

A better measure is to look at how much value was provided compared to signing a replacement level guy (like a D-league callup) for the league min. For example, a stat like Hollinger’s EWA (Estimated Wins Added) says D. Jones added 0.4 wins, L. Head 0.3 wins, E. Watson -0.1, S. Jones -0.2. So this would say only Luther Head provided reasonable value and Solomon Jones and Earl Watson were worse than your typical D-league callup. Of course, Hollinger’s PER is not a great measure of defensive output, so you would make some adjustments there as well.

by dtung on Apr 22, 2010 3:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Excellent point

Just because you overpay Watson and Jones and hand them starters minutes, doesn’t mean they are NBA calibur starters.

We could have played AJ Price 40 minutes per game and skewed his worth to ruthian levels.

" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico loose a ball in the Sun? "

by aaronb on Apr 22, 2010 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Indiana Pacers. Email: indycornrows@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Pacers shooting SLUMP
Small
ESPN 's NBA Future Power Rankings
Smitsri01_small
Bad news (for the "trade Granger" crowd)
Tumblr_l54xl7wl4b1qayczvo1_500_small
This is (really) cheesy, but get on board
Images_small
A Continuation on the 10-Day Contract Conversation-Some Realistic NBDL Options
Small
Should the Pacers Bring in Someone?
Tumblr_l54xl7wl4b1qayczvo1_500_small
Good news: Hill plans to be back before the All Star Break
Small
If the playoffs started today,
Small
Barbosa/Randolph?
Invertmanstar_small
D West for Al Jefferson?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

Iclogo_new_small Tom Lewis

Editor

Core_small Nathan S.

Authors

The_outside_world_small Ian Levy

Small Glenn A.