Pacers 102, Kings 95: Granger Scores 33, Pacers Shake Off Sluggish Start To Beat Kings
The Indiana Pacers appeared to be in full tank mode in the first quarter against the Sacramento Kings, but of course we know that wasn't the case. So without that excuse they were just flat, lifeless, awful.
Pick your favorite description for letting the Kings jump out to an early lead and make it look easy along the way. Tyreke Evans wasn't making shots by he still made the game look easy and a triple-double seem like a foregone conclusion.
The Kings were up 15 midway through the second quarter, but then the Pacers started to ease their way back into the game. There was no definitive spark to ignite the rally but once shots started to fall and the Kings started to stumble.
Suddenly then the Pacers had pieced together a 38-16 run that put the home team up 69-60 midway through the third quarter. The Kings eventually stopped the bleeding to close the third with a run that made it look like we might have a tight one down the stretch.
But close games are so last year.
The Kings would get no closer than three points and a 13-2 run, capped by a 3-pointer from A.J. Price after the ball swung around the perimeter, gave the Pacers all the cushion they would need to close out the win, 102-95.
The win was Jim O'Brien's 100th as coach of the Indiana Pacers, a milestone he deemed "irrelevant" after the game. "The fact I had no idea tells you how irrelevant it is," O'Brien said.
Seems like a sage answere considering JOB also has 139 losses to his credit with the Pacers. Unfortunately, as irrelevant as the milestone may be in JOB's coaching career, the actual win itself is equally irrelevant since it leaves the Pacers in the 10th spot in the upside-down standings after the Clippers dropped another game last night.
At least they played well.
More thoughts and observations on the win after the jump.
- Danny Granger finished the night with 33 points to cap another efficient scoring effort from the Pacers lead dog. Granger only shot 20 times and made 4 of 7 three-point attempts and score 25 second-half points. In fact, at the break Granger had only shot the ball six times.
- Interesting backcourt matchups to start the game. While Brandon Rush guarded Tyreke Evans and Earl Watson, Beno Udrih, the Kings flipped it when they were on defense with Evans covering Watson and the ball and Udrih on Rush. Smart move since Rush wouldn't be taking Udrih in the post.
- How come I often hear about Evans needing a true point guard so he can play off the ball? He struggled at times tonight, but also showed signs of being a beast with the ball in his hands running the show. The Pacers did a good job slowing him down, but he still finished with 17 points, 10 assists and 7 rebounds. He also had 7 turnovers which helped keep the Pacers going.
- A couple of those turnovers were courtesy of Roy Hibbert jumping out to defend a high ball screen. Hibbert cleaned up a steal of Tyreke Evans and took two dribbles and a few very long strides to beat Evans to the hoop for a layup. Roy tumbled into the crowd after making the bucket but was able to hustle back on defense and arrive in time to grab the next available defensive rebound. Very nice effort which was desperately needed at that point in the game. Later in the fourth quarter, Hibbert picked Evans again, forcing Evans to foul the big fella before he started galloping the other way.
- Middle of second quarter, A.J. Price drove baseline and then found a wide open Brandon Rush set up in the opposite corner. Rush took the pass and promptly splashed the corner shot, but his toe was on the line so an open 3-pointer becomes a two. Little things like that add up over the long haul and highlight the difference between a winning and losing streak.
- Troy Murphy put up another double-double with 19 points and 13 rebounds. I see him make the threes. I notice a lot of his rebounds. Still, these numbers seem to pile up unnoticed. Maybe it's just me.
- Former Purdue Boilermaker, Carl Landry was his normal active self in a starting role for the Kings. Landry finished with 17 points and 10 rebounds. He's also added some noticeable bulk to his upper body from his days at Mackey Arena.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
How come I often hear about Evans needing a true point guard so he can play off the ball? He struggled at times tonight, but also showed signs of being a beast with the ball in his hands running the show. The Pacers did a good job slowing him down, but he still finished with 17 points, 10 assists and 7 rebounds. He also had 7 turnovers which helped keep the Pacers going.
You hear this because people are trying to diminish his accomplishments. A lot of people spent a lot of time saying he wasn’t a real PG and didn’t have a real position in the NBA and thus now they don’t look as good and they’re trying to figure out ways to criticize him without looking like they’re trying to. Stupid really, but that’s pundit jealousy for you.
Great game by Granger, and I covet Troy Murphy. Argh.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985......
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Oh another point about Tyreke (that I meant to write)
Nobody criticizes the Miami Heat for Dwyane Wade having the ball in his hands all the time.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985......
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
That's because the Heat don't say he's a point guard pookey
They’re not being blasphemous like we are.
Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order and Originator of the "Brock Ness Monster".
Shutup you.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985......
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I mentioned in our game thread,
‘Reke is filthy! I’ve watched more Kings games than any other team this year, (excluding Pacers of course) so I can’t really comment on the Evans vs. Jennings ROY battle, but I’m under the opinion that 20, 5, and 5 pretty much speaks for itself. As for his true position, who cares? As long as he gets the ball in his hands, 1-2-3 doesn’t really matter. You guys are set with a stud for years to come.
As for Murph, luckily he is a piece that can be coveted. I do wonder how you guys would use him though. His skill set seems to be ideal for some teams and probably a hinderance for others. Would a Landry for Murph trade be something you would do given the chance? I know Pacers fans would love to see Landry paired up with Hibbert and Granger. What’s your opinion?
I've think you've been poisoned by Peaches & Jerry Jantz. Only a fool would think that a guy being productive is what matters.
The history of the NBA draft says that College Seniors are less likely than any other group to be NBA stars. Does that mean Danny Granger isn’t a star now?
I would trade Carl for Murphy, but I’d trade JT to get him. Especially if the Kings get lucky enough to top pick in the top 3 and indulge me by taking Derrick Favors.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985......
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I like Landry
But I don’t know how I feel about him matched up with Roy and Danny. He doesn’t really seem like a big time rebounder, which I’d rather have. He’d match up with Roy better than Murph, but…I don’t think I’d be all that excited about hitching the wagon to Landry with Roy and Danny.
Probably be more excited than I am now with Murph though.
Guess I did speak prematurely...
I see Landry as an improved version of T-Brough, with a higher ceiling as well. He can score inside using his body, gets to the free throw line often and shoots a high percentage as well, and can hit the 18’. Rebounding isn’t the best, but I think Hibby can improve on that area as he gets stronger and adjusts to the NBA.
Pookey: I’m missing the meaning of your first point, it could be due to the 8hr drive I just completed… I’d love to agree with you but I’m lost :) JT is an interesting young talent also. I see rumblings on your site about his foul troubles. How’s he been doing at that this year? We also have out frustrating moments with Hibbert and fouls, but the big guy has been staying out of foul trouble for the second half of the season and has started to show glimpses of what may be.
I think I'm just not buying into Roy's rebounding abilities
I’m becoming (I’ve become?) a big fan of this guy, but I still think he’ll remain a substandard rebounder even as he improves all around. Of course, it is kind of hard to really tell how good of a rebounder he can be when Murph is eating every rebound in the universe. Roy did do a good job in Murph’s absence at the beginning of the year, but I think he’ll top out at an 8 RPG guy personally. I’d love to be wrong though.
And I keep forgetting we have Hansbrough. I still don’t have any clue what he can offer this team.












