Bulls 109, Pacers 101: Pacers Break Down Heading Into All-Star Break
The Indiana Pacers appeared to start their All-Star break one quarter earlier than expected.
After pumping in 86 points in the first three quarter, the Pacers not only reliquished the five-point lead they took into the final quarter, but were only able to muster up 15 points at winning time, allowing the visiting Chicago Bulls to scoop up the 109-101 win before leaving town.
While the game could be held up as a microcosm of the season thus far, I felt it really highlighted the difference in Danny Granger's game from this year to last.
Through two and a half quarters, Granger seemed intent on reminding everyone just why he was selected to play in the All-Star game last season. He had 22 points and his shooting stroke looked comfortable and easy. The points were coming efficiently instead of through a heavy volume of shots. He had made all of his three-point attempts, made it to the line and made all of his free throws at that point.
The game set up perfectly for Pacers' top player to carry his team to a victory before they went on a break.
But then the inconsistent, pressing, quick-firing 33 of '09-10 showed up with the game in the balance. Once he missed that first three-pointer, it seemed like Granger was doubling down on shot attempts to make up for the miss. Suddenly his shot attempts were in the 20's and he finished with only 27 points including two points in the waning seconds.
Winning time was over and instead of carrying the Pacers to a win, Granger led the lame fourth-quarter effort by the Pacers that let the game slip away. Actually, it started in the third quarter when the Pacers had an 11-point lead and the ball but missed on a couple of chances to extend the lead. The Bulls went on a 9-0 run to draw within two and tighten things up for the remainder of the game.
The Pacers did take a five-point lead into the fourth, though, but couldn't get anything going, scoring just four points in the first five minutes. It seemed to take awhile for the Bulls to realize the Pacers were willingly handing over the W, but eventually they got the hint and took control scoring the bulk of their 28 fourth-quarter points near the rim or from the free throw line.
This loss hardly lies in the lap of Granger alone, so please don't misunderstand. There was plenty of sloppy play to go around and really, anyone who stepped on the court for the Pacers in the fourth quarter shares in the blame for this defeat.
My frustration with Granger's game is borne out of the excitement I felt for the way he was playing in the first half. THIS was the Granger deserving the tag of All-Star. He has been through so many ups and downs this season with far more downs, seeing him put things together like he did was giving me hope of taking something positive into the All-Star break.
Instead I'll just go into the All-Star break...numb.
More thoughts after the jump.
- With three point guards suddenly playing well enough to deserve minutes available for only two, JOB decided to give the nod to his veterans, meaning rookie A.J. Price was left out of the rotation. JOB's explanation was that they wanted to give Price some consistent minute to see just what type of player they had and now that he's shown what he can do, the team knows what they have. But...what are we doing here? Price ends up not playing a minute tonight, which I assume is what we can expect if JOB sticks with this rotation. If Price has shown he's worthy of future point guard minutes, shouldn't the team keep developing him in that role NOW.
- For the Pacers to hold any intrigue through the remainder of the season, they have to play the young players. It's fun to watch for one thing. Plus, losses are a little more tolerable if you see Roy working his tail off to develop his post game or A.J. Price trying to expand his game and develop his defense. Maybe it's just me, but I'd give up a win or two (although, would I?) to see the young player on the court more.
- The Pacers struggled all night handling the Bulls' forwards. Luol Deng and John Salmons combined for 43 points while making life miserable on the Pacers. It was awfullyl nice of Vinny Del Negro to keep Salmons on the bench for much of the third quarter, although at 32 minute off the bench we saw plenty of Salmons.
- T.J. Ford had a nice little 7-0 personal run late in the third quarter complete with another three-pointer. After returning from his foray out of the rotation Ford is now 4-5 from behind the arc. May have to start calling him, Three. J.
- Derrick Rose had some outbursts of greatness tonight, mostly while flying through the air to finish takes in transition. Earl Watson did give Rose fits at times, but when the young point guard was able to shift gears in the open court no one could keep up with him.
- Roy Hibbert had a tough night offensively scoring 9 points on 4-13 shots with 8 rebounds, but just couldn't get his post game going. In the fourth quarter, JOB tried to get Hibbert going to stem the tide but the big fella rushed one post move and then simply missed a second opportunity. Not the answer tonight.
- The Pacers had a pair of double-doubles with Danny Granger's 27 points and 10 rebound effort along with Troy Murphy's 18 points and 16 rebounds. Nice nights indeed, just not enough of those numbers collected when it really counted in the fourth quarter.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Sigh...
It honestly looked like the players lost this game on purpose. Perhaps they’ve figured out that nothing good can come from winning for the rest of the season.
JOB’s rotations continue to infuriate me. Now, no AJ Price at all. WTF?
I seriously hope we come out of the all-star break with a new coach. If not, I may not be able to watch too many more games this season (and I have watched every single one so far).
Even the Chicago announcers started to pick up on it late in the game: “Wow. This team just doesn’t play very well. On paper, they have lots of talent. They should be much much better than they are.” Gee, whose fault could that be…?
ugh, more crap from JOB
The AJ Price thing is a bit ridiculous. His quotes in the Star are about how they wanted to find out what they have with him and now they know. And he said that AJ learns more every game he plays…….so we’ll stop playing him because there’s nothing left for him to learn? Or there’s nothing else we need to know about him as a player?
And then there’s this:
O’Brien wanted his players to attack the offensive glass or sprint back on defense to load up in the paint so they could help defend Rose.
So the coach wanted the team to either have one strategy, or, have the opposite strategy?
Well, at least now we’re tied for the 5th draft slot and a 1/2 game out of the 4th. And there’s no way JOB coaches us next season, right? right? RIGHT???
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
We can only hope....
Psvirsky. sigh
Opportunity is missed by most people because it comes dressed in overalls and looks like work.
-Thomas Edison
I don’t know anyone that likes OB, but who else is there to coach? Avery has experience, but like Mark Jackson, they don’t want to be assistant coaches anywhere and pay their dues. They feel like they are owed a coaching job. That’s not the kind of people the Pacers should hire.
The only name I can think of that sounds good is Bill Laimbeer. I think he’d bring the kind of toughness the Pacers need.
oh well
hopefully a loss like this will put a zap in the pacers trade talks over the break and bird actually does something. saw the thing about hickson today. let’s get this done over break!
The Game
I think the Bulls coasted defensively for three quarters. They where not playing hard and let Ford get a couple. Then in the fourth they turned the switch on and started playing. The Pacers played a good game, for them, but that is still not good enough to beat a mid level eastern conference team. There is no heart left on this team, and with all the line up changes the players don’t have established roles.










