Bucks 97, Pacers 95: Bogut, Bucks Tip Over Pacers
0.5 seconds to heartache.
Crunch-time, game-on-the-line execution was the difference between winning and losing. When it mattered most, the Indiana Pacers came up short, while the Milwaukee Bucks flawlessly executed a lob pass and tip by Andrew Bogut, then joyfully ran off the Bradley Center court with a 97-95 win.
There were plenty of missed opportunities and head-scratching plays to ponder through the first 47 minutes of this game, but let's cut to the chase. The game was up for grabs with a W waiting for the team that made the play to take it in the final 30 seconds.
Danny Granger tied the game with a nice 17-foot jumper with 33 seconds remaining. Granger had a nice mid-range game going late and this contested shot gave the Pacers a burst of energy with enough time on the clock to guarantee another possession.
After getting the stop they needed, the Pacers had the ball with a 24 seconds left in the game which meant a last shot opportunity for the win. The execution of the game-winning attempt was nearly perfect. Granger was freed up, rolling off a Hibbert pick and had the ball around the free throw line, in that mid-range zone where he was doing work.
Luc Mbah a Moute stayed with Granger quite well but Granger had a half-step on him. Andrew Bogut stepped in to double Danny and deny the pull up shot. With Brandon Jennings tripling the effort from behind, Granger found the open man. Roy Hibbert was set up in one of his favorite spots, a foot above the free throw line on the right side of the lane. Granger put the ball on Hibbert's shooting hand, cocked and ready to fire with three seconds to go.
Then nothing.
Hibbert treated the ball like a hot potato, rushing his release leaving the shot wide right to barely graze the rim. Big Roy's first shot at hero status quickly turned to a learning experience. With 0.5 seconds left, it seemed he'd have a shot at redemption in overtime.
Instead the Bucks executed a perfect out-of-bounds play that Jim O'Brien and the Pacers knew was coming but couldn't stop. Luc Mbah a Moute threw an absolutely perfect lob pass from the left side of the court just over the rim where Andrew Bogut gently re-directed the ball to tip in the game winner.
Jeff Foster had a body on Bogut after fighting through a screen but wasn't able to jump up. As Foster tried to move Bogut off the court, the Aussie's finger tips stayed in play with ease and in that blink of an eye, the Pacers were left holding another frustrating loss.
After the jump, a few more thoughts and observations.
- Plenty of second-guessing available for this one. JOB mentioned after the game he was expecting that lob play, but bringing in a cold Jeff Foster instead of a more athletic Josh McRoberts is the first question for the hindsight olympics. Foster played it pretty well, but again, Mbah a Moute's pass was insane and Bogut timed his part perfectly as well. McRoberts may have been a step late on the pick or with the way this game was going, might've been called for a foul if he did go up with Bogut. On the replay, it looks like even if Foster did try to jump, he would've been a bit late. Not sure even a foul would've changed it since the pass was so nice it didn't take much of a tip. Ugh.
- The Pacers dumped plenty of opportunities along the way as they struggled to play at a winning level all night. Credit the team for a much improved second half and giving themselves a chance to win when it appeared in the first half that they were just going to have a throw-away night.
- Somewhere Moses Malone had to be smiling over the Bucks' offensive rebounding in the first half and really, for a stretch of the first quarter, where they utilized the tipped ball quite effectively, not for buckets but to save possessions. They finished the game with 19 offensive rebounds but 15 of those were in the first half. 15! But in Moses fashion, a chunk of those extra chances were own tipped misses.
- The Bucks shots 36% from the floor and only scored 41 second-half points, but the Pacers couldn't take advantage. There were whistles galore, though, with 50 fouls keeping the action nice and ugly. The Pacers weren't great, but did shoot over 43% on the night. That's why there are four factors to winning, though. With the turnovers about even, the Bucks made 10 more free throws and crushed the Pacers 19-5 on the offensive glass.
- It was a grind for the Pacers to score at times. Danny Granger finished with 26 points, but the second unit had to work to find buckets. Brandon Rush came up empty offensively most of the night and shrunk even more down the stretch. After the Bucks tied the game with a minute to go, Rush threw a horrible pass out on the perimeter for a turnover. It appeared he wanted nothing to do with the ball in his hands at that time.
- Overall, the team was just out of sync. After several stops in the fourth quarter with a chance to take control of a tight game, they just couldn't get an easy bucket. One possession in particular symbolized the night's effort. Josh McRoberts took the ball up court and maintained his dribble before taking it in the lane and kicking it out to an open Mike Dunleavy in the corner for a three. With a defender running at him, Dunleavy shot in what appeared to be his normal rhythm, except the shot hit the side of the backboard.
- I was actually getting excited down the stretch thinking the Pacers were heading toward the most beautiful of ugly wins. Shaking off a really bad half to find a way to get it done on the road. Then just like that, nothing but a painful loss.
35 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
thoughts...
- Danny’s jump shot to tie the game was a beaut and his pass to Hibbert was on the money. HOPEFULLY with more experience he can become “the guy” down the stretch. He just doesn’t have the one-on-one game that is best suited for that though.
- Bogut outplayed Hibbert
- Collison needs a midrange game of some sort or a tear drop or something. Good to see him on the court at the end of the game though
- McRobert’s sometimes looks like the perfect 4 man for our team… running the floor, playing solid defense, hitting wide open threes, energy, ect. Then the other times he looks downright AWFUL and does the stupidest crap imaginable. He would be really suited as the first big off the bench… but maybe with more experience (this is the first time in his career he has gotten a change to play) he will lower the dumb moments a bit.
- I wonder how good we could be if we had “that guy” off the bench that can come in and energize the team and get buckets when we start off slow. We just don’t have that.. we are woefully thin and inconsistent past Granger, Hibbert, Collison.
^this
Also, why is that a bench that has capable scorers struggles so much on offense. It seems apparent to me that Dunleavy is better suited for coming off the bench. Rush isn’t a reliable enough option for the second unit and his defense is probably more valuable for the first unit, which is filled with good scorers. Dunleavy is a defensive liability at times, but you can’t deny he has basketball IQ. He makes great cuts, rarely takes bad shots (if ever), and plays hard. I honestly really like Dunleavy, just not his contract. I think his talents could be a strong asset to a second unit that seems lost at times as to what they should do.
by infinityzero.systemerror on Dec 9, 2010 3:30 AM EST up reply actions
what capable scorers are on the bench???
our most capable scorer is Price nad he is in street clothes
Collison has a terrific mid-range game
He just hasn’t been using it. I wonder if JOB has discouraged it, because the first two weeks of the season he pulling up the dribble for 15 footers all the time, and making a bunch, but largely those shots have disappeared.
I think Granger got a lot of reps as “the guy” at the end of the game two years ago, got lucky a lot, and might have made him over confident. Now confidence is a good thing, but I have to admit I thought his game tying jumper was a horrible shot. I argued with my wife about it for awhile, arguing the point that just because it went in doesn’t make it a good shot. It was heavily contested, at least 20ft. away, and I believe there were still 9 seconds left on the shot clock. It looked to me like he could have taken one more hard dribble to split the two defenders and gotten an open 12 footer, gone all the way to the basket, drawn a foul or drawn the interior defense and gotten someone else a layup.
I was happy with the results, but I was definitely screaming NO! when it left his hand. He honestly believes he can make that shot every time which is great, except he only makes it about 40% of the time and has missed a bunch of them recently in close games (Oklahoma City) that is not the shot I want the team relying on in that situation, need a bucket.
There are really only two plays: Romeo and Juliet, and put the darn ball in the basket. ~Abe Lemons
Find me at IndyCornrows
and Hickory-High
was it heavily contested/ I don’t remember it being but then again my stream was choppy blurry and terrible. I could be remembering it terribly (finals week brain is fried) but I thought it came after one our broken plays that was going nowhere and he bailed us out. Shooting with 9 secs left on the shot clock could have been a function of going 2 for 1 maybe? That doesn’t excuse a bad shot obviously but could have been the thinking.
I don’t think granger possesses the “hard dribble to split to defenders” in his repertoire unfortunately.
And he could have drove and drawn the interior defense and kicked it out to a wide open 15 footer… errrrrrr…. :(
I might need to watch it again.
I remember it as a high screen set by Hibbert and he just kind of curled around and shot it right next to the screen. The screener’s man (I think it was Hibbert) had a hand in his face, and either Granger’s man or a man sagging off the corner shooter had a hand up as well. They were going 2 for 1 which ultimately helped get Hibbert the look at the game winner. I would still just rather see something besides that shot in that situation.
Again I’m glad it went in, I just feel like that was the shot Granger we looking for and I wish we would have been looking for something better.
There are really only two plays: Romeo and Juliet, and put the darn ball in the basket. ~Abe Lemons
Find me at IndyCornrows
and Hickory-High
I always thought Mcroberts was part of the future core, it looks better and better.
I though he was one of the better Pacers players last night down the stretch, even making a clutch shot. The potential is there. Man can shoot, play defense, gives you paint presence, has dribble penetration capabilities, and will rebound efficiently with the limited minute he’s given.
The first half was a failed effort on a team level, JMac included, where was the Gang Rebounding they all talked about? Forget the last play, this game should’ve been won during the third quarter.
After approximately 1/4 of the season, what is still our biggest weakness? Point Guard! Collison doesn’t appear to bring the determination on the defensive end, and both he and Ford are too small and slim against almost any opponent.
by latrell spreewel on Dec 9, 2010 10:58 AM EST up reply actions
point guard is well down the line as far as weakness. Get real.
or bench is terrible
shooting guard is woefully inconsistent
the 4 is still a concern because posey… well he tries but he sucks on offense and mcbob is really inconsistent. and we won’t play tyler
after that, maybe point guard defense. collison has looked good on offense
Well
our bench has actually kept us in many games, I wouldn’t say terrible, inconsistent at worst.
I would agree with the 4 position, we need definitely need some more consistency there.
The shooting guard position was expected to be woefully inconsistent, but I think we can all agree it is not the weak point. Rush has been a surprise and Duns has had his moments.
As for the point, I think we will get more out of our point guards as the season progresses.
I know it has been said, but is worth repeating. This as a new team with young players, there are going to be some frustrating losses, but we have reason to be excited for this season and for Pacers basketball in the future.
get real? really? dbcd, point out another player on the team who has played worst defense than Collison. name one.
by latrell spreewel on Dec 9, 2010 1:41 PM EST up reply actions
Solomon Jones
There are really only two plays: Romeo and Juliet, and put the darn ball in the basket. ~Abe Lemons
Find me at IndyCornrows
and Hickory-High
Solomon Jones
There are really only two plays: Romeo and Juliet, and put the darn ball in the basket. ~Abe Lemons
Find me at IndyCornrows
and Hickory-High
Solomon Jones
There are really only two plays: Romeo and Juliet, and put the darn ball in the basket. ~Abe Lemons
Find me at IndyCornrows
and Hickory-High
and also . . . Solomon Jones
There are really only two plays: Romeo and Juliet, and put the darn ball in the basket. ~Abe Lemons
Find me at IndyCornrows
and Hickory-High
His defense has gotten better since the season began
But I don’t know if I’ve a big man struggle as much as he does defending the pick and roll
There are really only two plays: Romeo and Juliet, and put the darn ball in the basket. ~Abe Lemons
Find me at IndyCornrows
and Hickory-High
Him and Collison working together to defend a pick and roll is an absolute nightmare.
There are really only two plays: Romeo and Juliet, and put the darn ball in the basket. ~Abe Lemons
Find me at IndyCornrows
and Hickory-High
his defense may be bad but point guard is not our biggest weakness.
you didn’t say “biggest weakness on defense”… you said biggest weakness. Collison still gets buckets
and yes… solomon jones. And dunleavy fails the eye test on defense horribly. and who the hell was guarding iylosava last night? or channing frye a couple nights ago?
yes, there are other Pacers who are also inconsistant, but DC is consistanly getting beat
Darren Collison has shown that he can score with and without the basketball, but for a guy who was suppose to be the big upgrade over the offseason, he does leave a lot to be desire. Yes, I did say Collison is our biggest weakness because all the scouts in the league knows that they will have a field day aginst him on the offensive end. He is a very, very poor defender.
by latrell spreewel on Dec 10, 2010 10:12 AM EST up reply actions
In "winning time"
Dunleavy throws up an awful brick 3 off the side of the board. Rush throws a bailout pass to no one in particular for the TO. Hibbert airballs a 15 footer on the last offensive possession for the lead. A positive possession on any of those and we don’t have to worry about Bogut tipping in a perfect (really impressive to be honest) pass off the opposite sideline.
Lots of things to be excited about this season. Lots of learning left to do.
٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶ The sky is falling!
POSTGAME GUY
Hey, I was actually at this game and was the guy if you watched Pacers post game who they showed apparently after the game winning shot went in. Can anyone describe what they saw or if they have the video of it potentially? I heard it was pretty funny. Just wondering if anyone would let me know.
But as far as the game goes, the Bucks are just a bad matchup for the Pacers. It has been proven time and time again. They are gritty. We are not. We run offense. They do not. They have Mbah Moute and Bogut (great defensive players) to guard our two best offensive players and Collison still looked gimpy on that ankle (though he played pretty well). The bench was nothing to get excited about today either.
OJ Mayo
Also, I have all summer thought O.J Mayo is the perfect piece this team needs. He is a crunch time ball-handler/scorer, which is what the Pacers desperately need. Obviously, word is now he is somewhat on the block for the right price. I think Rush/George, McRoberts and 1st would do it to be honest, especially considering we’d have to extend him. Nevertheless, I think Mayo is the ideal player for this roster; overall, I like the performances thus far in the season and I don’t think Bird is ready to swing for the fences with a big trade.
by ClutchReggie31 on Dec 9, 2010 2:11 AM EST up reply actions
I like Mayo and all, but a SG isn't exactly the issue for this team.
Also, trading our starting PF (the teams best option) at this time would seem counter-productive. Though I would love to give away the consistently inconsistent Rush.
by infinityzero.systemerror on Dec 9, 2010 3:33 AM EST up reply actions
Last play of the game
should have never happened. Obie goes with Foster??? Just nuts. How about a guy who can get in the air and just tip the ball away? Solo, McRob, hell even Dahntay Jones. Would have even made more sense just playing a zone, no?
I've never been big on Solo
but he’s been playin his best basketball with the Pacers the past 2 weeks. In a game where we’re outrebounded by +10 he only gets 6 minutes of playing time? He got 2 rebounds in those 6 minutes – almost as much Hibbert got the whole game! He also had a couple of great baskets. Once again, I don’t get it O’Brien.
twitter - MattAnderson19
by in_Votto_We_Trust on Dec 9, 2010 3:33 AM EST reply actions
oh come on
begging for solo now? 2 weeks ago no one wanted him near the court.
I don’t like o’brien but there are plenty of real things to pick at him for that we don’t have to make up stuff like “needed more Solo!” Especially since he is no ta good rebounder anyway
I thought
it was weird Foster was in and now McBob, who is much more athletic. Then again, there were a few really weird substitutions in this game, like leaving Ford in for the offense and substituting Collison in for the D, that made no sense to me, or leaving Posey in for extended minutes down the stretch when he was in one of his crap modes (I swear he is bipolar). To be fair to JOB it’s the first time in a while where I’ve really felt like he lost control of his substitutions.
This game never should have come down to a tip in.
The Pacers were out worked plain and simple. The team didn’t even show up until the 3rd quarter. The Bucks are not more talented than the Pacers, they just do the things to win the game where the Pacers do not.
The Pacers piss away possessions like an old Gatorade cup.
Rebound and don’t turn the ball over. It’s amazing how low your opponent scores if you give them 20 less possessions.
The team has to decide do you want to win or is giving a good effort enough? Someone on the team (not JOB) needs to grab everyones’ nuts and say, “stop jerking around and start executing or get off the court!”
1. Rush throws the worst pass imaginable with about 2 minutes left. That loss of possession was a killer.
2. Hibbert air ball with timing expiring. If it hits the rim we go into OT. How do you shoot an airball from 17 feet??
3. Darren Collison needs to stop chasing point guards all night. Move your feet and turn them! You are killing us defensively by allowing the penetration.
You are banned from Stampede Blue.
You can browse the blog, but you can't participate.
Calling a site admin a 'dumbass' gets you banned. Enjoy.
-technically I said, "only a dumbass would want Bill Polian fired."
I thought his shot did hit the rim by the way. I think the officials blew that one.
There are really only two plays: Romeo and Juliet, and put the darn ball in the basket. ~Abe Lemons
Find me at IndyCornrows
and Hickory-High
Bench scoring / Energy
Hansborough and Price
Both need playing time and both can have an impact.
Why Price needs to play.
We are paying him. He can Shoot. He passes with both feet on the ground. He can win.
He just looks like he wants it more than TJ.
Sorry but ever since TJ Ford since lost his confidence to attack the basket he will always get stuck passing the ball in the air and or losing his dribble and ultimately turning the ball over and seriously he should hit the gym, his jump shot looks like he throwing up a medicene ball instead of a basketball.
Price’s Impact: Bench scoring/energy (no more tj turnovers)
Hansbough needs to play becasue:
He scares all the other bigs on our team. He scares the bigs on the other team. As a team the Pacers can’t get or hit free throws consistantly, Tyler can. The main thing people can point to is when he is in the game he doesn’t look comfortable, why? He hasn’t played enough over the last 3 years he has not played much. He needs consistant time and maybe the Pacers we could have a real scoring and low post defensive threat. To put next to Hibbert.
McBobs is just goofy. He’s good enough to get off the bench now and again but should in no way be solidified as a starter.
Foster’s back is keepnig Jeff from being Jeff and its sad to see.
S Jones: I really don’t know about him he looks the part of back up center but is he really effective enough to contribute to wins in the way J Foster used to?
We all know a trade is going to go down this year ….. Who goes and why?
Candidates. TJ F ord
Dahntay Jones
Solo
What comes back a young PF/C or a veteran guard?
Love whats goning on with the team. Must admit it has been so good I have not had to vent my frustrations here for weeks hope we can keep up the good solid comptetive play.
I’m really excited about whats going on down@ the Fieldhouse because I think once we make “the move” whatever it may be could put this team over the top.
I really hope we can finish in the top half in the east a .500
One problem with Tyler is he hasn’t been that effetive in the high post. 8p9s broke down a post from Mike Wells with quotes from JOB saying Tyler hasn’t been playing because he isn’t making good decisions with the ball in the high post. I agree . . . so move him out of the high post! He should be making cuts to the basket, not passing to cutters! Why do we have to run the same exact sets regardless of personnel? Why can’t we have a few sets that are contingent on the lineup and ask Tyler to do something different than what we ask McRoberts or Hibbert to do? Why not maximize his strengths?
There are really only two plays: Romeo and Juliet, and put the darn ball in the basket. ~Abe Lemons
Find me at IndyCornrows
and Hickory-High


























