Grizzlies 87, Pacers 85: Indiana's Comeback Falls Just Short
The Pacers tipped off preseason action in Memphis against the Grizzlies, but managed to come up short on the scoreboard despite the team’s best efforts. Unfortunately, lack of television broadcast and inconsistent radio feed for those outside of WIBC’s range found they had to experience the game without those advanced media formats, being forced to trek through ancient methods such as internet blogs and live updating box scores, not unlike those who lived in Victorian England.
The game was one of runs. As Memphis took the lead on a 13-2 run in the second quarter, Indiana responded with a 14-2 run of their own after the half. The Grizzlies regained control in the fourth quarter, building a nine-point lead with less than three and a half minutes to play, and Indiana responded with a furious run that fell a point short and struggled to rebound when they had to.
Since the game itself is irrelevant, there’s no sense in wasting time getting to what matters: the performance of the team. Before we look at the games ever Pacer who took the floor put forth tonight, some team thoughts:
Rebounding could be a major issue this year indeed. The Pacers, despite pulling down 13 offensive boards, couldn’t keep up with Memphis's defensive rebounding effort, losing the overall battle 49-34
Shooting was also a large problem for this game. The team shot 38% from the field and only 62% from the line. Tack on a 9-29 shooting effort from beyond the arc, and it really isn’t so hard to find a couple of points to make this game a W. Such shooting could make the road a difficult place to play again.
Team effort appeared to be tremendous, especially in regards to Hibbert, McRoberts, and George. There's a lot to be taken from the positives of that kind of effort.
After the jump, breakdowns of every Pacer in this game, courtesy of the great Cornrows community and NBA.com’s in depth highlights and box scores!
- Danny Granger struggled all night finding his shooting stroke, finishing an abysmal 1-9 with only 5 points. He managed to get 5 rebounds, and appeared to do some extra things to help the team out. It’s hard to take a lot from him having an off night, as these things do happen from time to time. Keep an eye on him Friday, however.
- Darren Collison, if for one night, lived up to his expectations as a legitimate NBA point guard. He made plays that involved his teammates and even found time to throw in his own material into the highlight reel. It’s difficult to say whether O’Brien’s system is or isn’t agreeing with Collison, but a workable debut doesn’t hurt.
- Roy Hibbert had a tremendous outing, finishing a double double 18-10. Many questions about Roy’s ability to push 36 minutes a night were answered as Roy played a team high 31 minutes, and finished with four fouls and a wonderful 7-9 shooting.
- Josh McRoberts may have been the biggest surprise. When O’Brien said Josh was the most impressive in camp, he certainly intended that to mean what it sounded like. Josh’s trademark energy was on display, but valuable contributions in a statistical sense were also a huge part of the night. As if the starting job wasn’t Josh’s to lose before the game, then it certainly is now.
- Mike Dunleavy started the first quarter and made some nice "Hey, this is the Mike Dunleavy we’ve grown accustomed to" plays and shots. Dunleavy didn’t get much, if any second half reps, leading everyone to wonder: why does the NBA allow games to be played that cannot be viewed? Fortunately, it seems there’s no health concern right now.
- Paul George was huge. Despite struggling offensively, he was one of the team’s biggest contributors from a hustle standpoint, giving the Grizzlies fits defensively, even doing all he could to try and get the Pacers the victory at the end of the game. George started the second half, certainly answering some questions as to his place within the rotation at this point.
- Brandon Rush seems to be falling in the rotation, as he got nine minutes of action, and as expected, made marginal impact in those nine minutes, scoring just four points on three shots.
- A.J. Price showed his scoring touch wasn’t lost on his injury, scoring 12 points in just under 15 minutes. He also showed his game hadn’t evolved into a more traditional point guard style; that is if his 0 assists weren’t already an indication to that.
- Lance Stephenson got some action towards the end of the game at the PG position and found himself outclassed defensively by Mike Conley. It appears defense is a huge issue for Lance at this point, it’d be nice to get it sorted out, but not a day goes by where I’m not increasingly skeptical about his ability to play the point.
- Solomon Jones almost disappointed just as much as Josh McRoberts impressed. In a last man standing tryout session, Price and McBobs played well, and Solo’s lack of impact certainly didn’t help his case of keeping his job with Indiana.
- Jeff Foster got five minutes of action, took a hard hit, and saw his night come to an early close. It’s simply good to see him back on the floor, if I could have seen him take the floor.
- Magnum Rolle was limited in time and his offerings were limited, but he did manage to find three of the team’s offensive rebounds.
- James Posey offered a three pointer and a pair of boards in his limited action.
- Dahntay Jones got to the line six times, but didn’t hit any of his five field goal attempts. Which raises the question, do we need both Posey and D.Jones?
Friday’s game is on FS Indiana and Saturday’s game on NBA TV. Basically, that means you’ll soon be able to watch the Pacers play basketball. Deeper insights on the players will be offered then, but in the meantime, it’s simply good to have the Pacers back in action!
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
NBA most improved player 2010-2011: Josh Mcroberts
Holy cow, if JOB allowed Josh to play more minutes tonight, JMAC might’ve had a trible double. Josh had good hustle and efficiency, although too many turnovers, but I much rather see his style of play than a ‘stretch 4’.
by latrell spreewel on Oct 6, 2010 11:39 PM EDT reply actions
Sounds like Stephenson could be on the inactive list to start the season.
Disappointing for me, since I like him. After reading the stuff about McRoberts, it really makes me wish that this was on TV so I could have seen myself. I’m still skeptical, but I’m excited at the same time (even if he is from Carmel). I’ve said it before and I’ll go ahead and say it again, I want George to start and have Dunleavy be the first off the bench. I hope Solo goes. Seeing that Roy appeared dominant just makes me giddy, but those rebounds make me even more so. The loss is disappointing, but I’m more psyched about the season now. Please tell the next game is televised.
by infinityzero.systemerror on Oct 7, 2010 1:40 AM EDT reply actions
I agree on stephenson, but disagree on J-mac
JOB always said that Josh is the teams most athletic big. Josh has talent and the skill set to be successful. Mcroberts will surprise a lot of people, he can shoot, pass, run the brakes, good strength and size for a normal 4. All the Pacers ask out of him is defense, hustle and rebounds which combine with the right mindset and fundamentals will show up at some point. Did I mention he is still 23?
by latrell spreewel on Oct 7, 2010 2:31 AM EDT up reply actions
Man, 51 total turnovers
Definitely sounds like a preseason opener. Maybe it’s a good thing this wasn’t televised, may’ve been painful to watch
٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶ The sky is falling!
that guaranteed contract for stephenson seems dumber and dumber. Doesn’t matter if you have the ability to score if your opponent scores just as easily right back.
I love price as a back up. Never liked him as a starter but as aback up I will take the scoring bunch. our bench looks like on scoring anyway so its a welcome addition.
The kid is 19. His defense might prevent him from making the immediate impact we thought he might have after summer league, but he is certainly capable of learning to play d.
Give the kid a chance will you? One fricking preseason game and you are bitching about his contract.
Fair enough
But don’t you think if the incident he was involved in was THAT bad, that Bird and Co. would have cut him by now? I’m sure there’s more to the story than we know, and that’s why the Pacers are keeping him.
In regards to JOB and Collison
At this point if they can’t make it work, I think as fans we have to even more strongly demand JOB’s job. For no reason on Earth should Darren not be doing just as well here, in Indy, as he did down in NO. At some point you have to stop blaming the players, (i.e. Ford) and start looking at the man in charge.
This preseason loss felt every bit like a win
The pacers simply blew the Grizzlies away when the starters were still in at the middle of the third. The Pacers lost the game when the second unit flounder during the end of the 3rd and the start of the fourth. Roy Hibbert definitely played better than Marc Gasol, now I simply can’t wait for the season opener, where Roy goes up against Tim Duncan!!!!!!!!!!
by latrell spreewel on Oct 7, 2010 11:15 AM EDT reply actions
Obie will be gone by Feb
In my observations Obie has already said publicly that Collison is going to have to adapt to “the system” …. meaning collison wont run the team … he will be forced to give the ball up as soon as he comes across the time-line ….. what other point guards have had their careers ruined by this “system”
If he ruins this Darren with his “systm” I will picket conseco
I will help start it with my picket
Obie has served his purpose.
I really have nothing else to say about the man.
Other than leave collison alone and play Paul George.
Why oh why must we contibue to play a natural scorer like Born ready at the 1.
It was understandable when all we had was TJ Ford, and an injured AJ Price. But Darren Collison is supposed to be our starting PG of the future right? And AJ Price is our back-up of the future right? So when we haven’t got a second complimentary scorer for Granger, and when we have a guy that could be that secondary scorer, why not give him some burn at the 2? I mean Dunleavy isn’t sticking around after this year(at least I hope not). Paul George sure despite his defensive qualities, has a long way to go offensively. And no offense, but we need a 2 who can score – otherwise we might as well go with Brandon Rush at the 2. We got Paul George to be the next T-Mac, sans bad attitude. So basically let Lance get some burn at the two. Let’s not forget Paul George is a boom-and-bust guy. He might be awesome(let’s hope so), or he might be crap. And while we should be hoping that he’s awesome, we should be planning that he might be crap. So let’s have a plab B in Born Ready, and let’s get him playing some minutes at the 2.
...
I think the idea is that Hibbert is the #2 and Collison can score too. I think that a scorer would be better served to be involved in the second unit. The first unit should have plenty of scorers, having a player like George to complement Granger would be very welcome on the starting unit. I like Stephenson, I really do, but I don’t think he’ll be able to remain on the active roster without some level of defense. I think the best choice would be to have a starting lineup of Collison, George, Granger, McBob (since he’s impressed), and Hibbert. Then the first guy off the bench being Dunleavy, who isn’t a great defender (better than Stephenson at this point however) but he can score from anywhere.
by infinityzero.systemerror on Oct 8, 2010 1:20 AM EDT up reply actions
I like george starting too
with him and mcbob we have a lot of high energy in the first unit.
Let Dunleavy help Price score in the second unit. Yes price… I think he suits the bench better than ford.
I may get slammed for this
But what about Brandon in the starting lineup still? This assumes his defense can show improvements. I wouldnt be against using him in a similar situation to how Denver used D.Jones in 08-09 to help set the tone for Duns. But if George can fill that role, I’d be more than willing to start him.
I’m all for Duns in the second unit regardless. I I think he better suits us As a scoring punch off the bench.
by Nathan S. on Oct 8, 2010 1:18 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I don't like Rush's chances.
His history has been written and it involves little improvement. I don’t expect him to suddenly start showing it now. If he really cared or truly improved he would have shown it during training camp, much like McBob. He didn’t and it only increased my disappointment in him, he can rot on inactive for what I care and walk at the end of the season. If you were wondering, I don’t like Rush… at all.
by infinityzero.systemerror on Oct 8, 2010 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions


























