Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Thunder 108, Pacers 102: A.J. Price Spices Up Ending To Familiar Story For Pacers

Yes, it was the same old story for the Indiana Pacers, but at least A.J. Price provided his own plot twist at the end to keep things interesting.

The Pacers dropped their second road game in as many nights, and ninth roadie in a row, to the Oklahoma City Thunder, 108-102.

There were plenty of painful reminders of past losses, complete with a decent first half despite average to poor shooting. A third quarter case of the blahs that saw the Thunder begin with a 10-3 run and eventually push their six-point halftime lead to 18 late in the quarter.

The Pacers were able to reel off four late points to draw within 13 at the start of the final quarter, once again setting up a rally that brought the blue and gold tantalizingly close to a win. And by close, I mean within one point, as in 93-92 after A.J. Price splashed a 3-ball with a little over five minutes left in the game.

Yes, Price hit the key shot during winning time, scoring his 12th point of the quarter en route to a 19-point final frame. Price's game really gathered steam in the fourth quarter when he began breaking down Russell Westbrook repeatedly to get the ball in the lane. After setting up teammates with open looks only delivered mixed results (clank), the rookie started leaving the scoring in his own hands and it was fun to watch.

Price finished the game with a career-high 23 points and 3 assist on 15 shots and 3-5 from behind the arc. Those two 3-point misses were big and could be classified as ill-advised shots with the team still only down four late in the game. The main problem though, centered around Price not getting the help he needed down the stretch in order for the Pacers to steal this win on the road.

In particular, Danny Granger's head-scratching play with the game in the balance put a damper on Price's big night.

Star-divide

I realize Granger is returning from several weeks on the shelf, so his game isn't firing on all cylinders yet, but some of the plays he made down the stretch had more to do with the mental side of the game as opposed to the physical. His decisions to pull deep three-pointers (and miss) with plenty of time remaining and the Pacers within four points, just weren't smart plays.

Then there was the foul on Kevin Durant out on the perimeter when Granger just was too aggressive and got up into Durant for an obvious foul. Durant's a pretty good free throw shooter. Durant actually missed a couple free throws on the night but still made 14 of 16, including the two after Granger's foul.

There are times when Granger doesn't have his shot going, like tonight (6-21 FGs), and you can tell he's pressing to make something happen. He just doesn't have the savvy in his game to find a way to get it done. No go-to move to get to the hoop, or ability to draw a foul when the defense doesn't want to foul. Right now, his fall-back plan is always to jack a 3-ball and so far this year that plan hasn't worked.

More thoughts:

  • Granger did score 25 points on those 21 FGAs thanks to making 9-13 from the free throw line. Hard to complain about a 25-point night, but Granger continues to play more like an NBA number two option than one when he can't carry the team home in a game like tonight. On the other side, Kevin Durant did everything the Thunder needed to close out the win which included 40 points on 18 FGAs and 12 rebounds.
  • T.J. Ford was on the inactive list tonight. After Price's night, Jim O'Brien may consider letting Price start and let Watson run things off the bench.
  • Speaking of the bench, part of that familiar story line included the negative +/- numbers for the starters compared to the + numbers for the players off the bench. Luther Head (-16), Roy Hibbert (-11) and Earl Watson (-14) didn't play at all down the stretch as Jim O'Brien stuck with his guys off the bench that were producing, which meant Price (+8), Mike Dunleavy (+10) and Brandon Rush (+10) all played at crunch time.
  • Troy Murphy played a ton of minutes (37+) in his second game back from a sprained ankle and put up his normal double-double numbers with 15 points and 15 rebounds although he, too was pretty quiet down the stretch.
  • The Pacers defense throughout the game gave up too many open looks for a solid-shooting Thunder team. OKC made over 51% of their FGAs and were able to get to the line 37 times compared to the Pacers 25 FTAs.
  • Shot selection wasn't just Danny Granger's problem. I'd say every Pacer that played forced a wrinkled brow or three at different times during the game. The team shot 26 3-pointers but only made 10, often settling for the 3-ball with the offense bogged down. OKC should get some of that credit as they played up to the league rank of #7 in defensive efficiency.

Comment 21 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Too bad I missed this one.

Not for another close heartbreaking loss, but for Price’s coming out party. He’s looked like he has had this kind of game in him. Good job AJ, I’m looking forward to seeing more of these performances!

by jantz101 on Jan 10, 2010 3:10 AM EST reply actions  

i missed the last 2 games...

but in looking at the scores… they’ve been a lot more exciting to watch it sounds like.

~SHaFF!~

by SHaFF87 on Jan 10, 2010 7:11 AM EST reply actions  

imagin that… hibbert playing terrible again when murphy is in the line up

by dbcb on Jan 10, 2010 10:59 AM EST reply actions  

Great write up

Good job on summarizing the game Tom. I want to build on a few of your comments.

- Granger is playing like a number two option in the NBA because he is a number two option. He is a great player, but he is not nor will he ever be a pure number one option in this league.
- Completely agree about Price. I liked when we drafted him. I liked us keeping him on the roster and now it is time to make the move to insert him in the starting lineup. What do we have to lose?
- Time for a trade? The trade winds are blowing. I would love to find a trade partner who would take Murph, MDJ and Ford off our hands. Is this really too much to ask? Please take our 2 overpaid duds and a worthless headcase of a point guard.

by davis3217 on Jan 10, 2010 12:54 PM EST reply actions  

agree/disagree

I think Granger CAN be a number one but to do so he needs to improve his explosivness and learn how to create his own shot. I also think he needs to start being more aggressive in getting to the basket. All the jumpers need to stop, he is a pretty good finisher when he gets to the rim but too many time he settles for a pull-up. Why?

by return2greatness on Jan 10, 2010 3:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd also like to say...

That I loved drafting Granger and I love him as a player. But I’ve seen to many 7-24 line scores recently.

by return2greatness on Jan 10, 2010 3:07 PM EST up reply actions  

A lil tored up about the lack of TV coverage this weekend!!!

Confucious say "He who dives for loose balls need proper fitting athletic cup!"

by Wise Master on Jan 10, 2010 1:44 PM EST reply actions  

Granger will never be a kobe, lebron, wade, durant, ect talent.

But he can (and is) a number one option… just not a SUPER number one option.

If you remember right, we had one of those stars for YEARS in Indiana… Reggie Miller. Miller was never a super star ala jordan,and those guys. ANd he did just fine…

by dbcb on Jan 10, 2010 3:31 PM EST reply actions  

Downside of course

How many did we win with Reggie at #1? Granger may become a better player than Miller, but I’m not sure yet if he can be the leader of a championship team. Of course, we don’t have anything near to the right talent around him to find out, but we did fine with Reggie, but didn’t win with Reggie.

Great game by Price. I mean, man, this kid has a future doesn’t he? What a savvy pick that late. Hopefully he can really anchor our backcourt and be the PG of the future for us. Is he already better than Travis Best, our second best PG in the NBA era?

by Nathan S. on Jan 10, 2010 4:31 PM EST up reply actions  

if you are using a championship as a barometer of “winning”… then there are a ton of great, hall of fame, best of all time players that don’t meet your requirements of a #1 team option

by dbcb on Jan 10, 2010 4:47 PM EST up reply actions  

A little different than what I meant

It’s about surrounding yourself with the right talent. Ignoring a lot of Jordan taking away from a lot of championship runs by great players, if you ask if we could have won a championship, sans Jordan, with Miller as our best player, I think it was proven we couldn’t. I love Reggie, but we had more opportunities without Jordan standing in our way (6) than we did with him standing in our way (2). We did quite well for ourselves with Reggie, and I loved every second of it, but if the goal is to win a championship, can we win a championship if we gave Danny the same opportunities we gave Reggie? We’re doing a bad job of that right now, unfortunately, but I think it’s valid to bring up.

by Nathan S. on Jan 10, 2010 5:23 PM EST up reply actions  

How many times did anyone beat Jordan in his prime?

I can count only the 95 Magic. Standing in our way as the guy to beat. I’d say our 96 team was a contender (3 seed in the East, back-to-back ECF) and of course our 98 team that lost to Jordan’s Bulls. He was the guy standing in everyone’s way.

by Nathan S. on Jan 10, 2010 5:33 PM EST up reply actions  

no i mean you said we had him standing in our way only twice… what do you mean?

that 98 team was our best team IMO… even though our 00 team made the finals

well check that… the brawl team was our best team :( i was psyched that year

by dbcb on Jan 10, 2010 5:42 PM EST up reply actions  

05 team

Was our best. Egghhh. Just painful to think back how exciting it was going into that year….

What I mean is that not counting the 05 team because of what happened, I believe we had eight teams that were legitimate contenders in the East (and essentially the league) in Miller’s time: 94-96, 98-00, 03-04. Only two of those teams coincided with Jordan’s championship reign. I think in that time, it was Jordan and TSOL, whereas it was much more open beyond that. If you ask me how many #1 caliber players that didn’t win championships in that era probably should’ve, I can think of a few guys that were probably better franchise guys that had their best runs coincide with Jordan; guys like Malone/Stockton, Barkley, Payton, who were more prototypical franchise guys than our franchise guy, guys that didn’t win that really could’ve/should’ve without having to go up against the GOAT.

I simply think that though we did quite well with Reggie, if we want to win a title, him as our best player was probably not the way to do it (though we did see that building around O’Neal and Artest), and unless we can fill around Danny perfectly, we probably look at a similar outcome, especially given the amount of depth that Danny will be playing with in his time in the league.

by Nathan S. on Jan 10, 2010 5:52 PM EST up reply actions  

well, to be fair to reggie, 99-00 and beyond he was past his prime (the per numbers support this… 99-00 his per dropped over 1.5)… the 03-04 team wasn’t really his anymore

by dbcb on Jan 10, 2010 6:04 PM EST up reply actions  

im not gonna judge price yet… its only been a few games and his assists are lower than i would like for a pg, but at this point I am very surprised and hopeful.

and best our second best pg? holy exaggeration

by dbcb on Jan 10, 2010 4:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Price's assist numbers

Are a bit low for my liking right now, but that can work itself out.

But second best? I mean, objectively, our second best PG is either Jamaal Tinsley or Travis Best.

by Nathan S. on Jan 10, 2010 5:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I meant to add onto that...

“…or Travis Best. He doesn’t exactly have a very big mountain to climb.”

by Nathan S. on Jan 10, 2010 5:28 PM EST up reply actions  

From what I've read..

Price wasn’t getting much help from his teammates. If he is dropping dimes but people aren’t finishing, his assist numbers aren’t going to look great.

by return2greatness on Jan 10, 2010 5:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Indiana Pacers. Email: indycornrows@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Pacers shooting SLUMP
Small
ESPN 's NBA Future Power Rankings
Smitsri01_small
Bad news (for the "trade Granger" crowd)
Tumblr_l54xl7wl4b1qayczvo1_500_small
This is (really) cheesy, but get on board
Images_small
A Continuation on the 10-Day Contract Conversation-Some Realistic NBDL Options
Small
Should the Pacers Bring in Someone?
Tumblr_l54xl7wl4b1qayczvo1_500_small
Good news: Hill plans to be back before the All Star Break
Small
If the playoffs started today,
Small
Barbosa/Randolph?
Invertmanstar_small
D West for Al Jefferson?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

Iclogo_new_small Tom Lewis

Editor

Core_small Nathan S.

Authors

The_outside_world_small Ian Levy

Small Glenn A.