The Only Way it Works
In response to Man of Pace's most recent FanPost about the rumors of Allen Iverson considering a move to the Pacers, I did some serious soul searching and I believe the Pacers should go for it! I also believe they can get their hands on the Answer with very little risk involved. Here's what has to be done:
The Pacers have exhausted their Mid Level Exception on the players they already acquired this summer, so that option is out. The only way the deal works involves a sign and trade with Detroit.
Indiana has about $2.25 million in S&T money from the Jermaine O'Neal deal last year. Since Iverson was reported to be willing to sign for somewhere in the $5 million range, Indiana would probably have to throw in a player to make contracts equal under CBA rules.
There is only one available player on the Pacers' current roster who has a salary that could contribute to a S&T getting done - Travis Diener, who currently has a 1 year deal worth $1.74 million. Luckily, salaries don't have to match exactly. According to the Collective Bargaining Agreement, a team's incoming salary cannot exceed 125% of the outgoing salary + $100,000. So, in terms of a money standpoint only, the trade would work if Iverson would agree to sign a 1-year salary at $5,087,500 or less.
Diener makes some sense for the Pistions, considering Will Bynum is their only point guard behind Rodney Stuckey. And, he's only inked for one more year, so they aren't tied down to a lengthy salary.
For Indiana from a financial perspective, it's a one-year experiment with no few strings attached. Iverson's #1 uni would certainly be a major contributor to jersey and ticket sales. It's not out of the question that Iverson's jersey would be in the top 5 in sales for the year, which is major money coming back to Indiana. Also, there's no denying that Iverson's talents on the court would help get fans back to Conseco. Not to mention he vaults the Pacers into the playoff discussion. A scoring tandem of Iverson and Danny Granger would give opposing teams nightmares night in and night out.
From a personnel standpoint, it takes care of worrying about a 4-man rotation (possibly 5 depending on the Pacers' stance on A.J. Price) at point guard. Iverson can play the 1 or 2, depending on match ups. A combination of Ford and Watson can split time at point guard when Iverson plays shooting guard.
However, It's not all cake and ice cream. There are several potential catastrophic risks attached to an Allen Iverson signing. For starters, both T.J. Ford and Earl Watson have been quite notorious for vocalizing their discontent of playing backup PG on previous teams. So much so, they were asked to be traded and fell out of favor with fans in Toronto and Oklahoma City. So, coach Jim O'Brien could have some pride issues with which to deal. Iverson has some baggage of his own in regards to playing time. He would expect to be the starter. Could he handle coming off the bench? It didn't go so well for him last year in Detroit. He had much to do with the dissension amongst players and coach Michael Curry in the Motor City. O'Brien better be prepared for a bumpy ride if he asks Iverson to come off the bench to spell Ford and/or Watson. All the work the Pacers have put into finding quality character players might blow up if not taken care of early. Don't doubt for a moment that if all goes wrong, O'Brien will be looking for new employment come spring of 2010!
It's definitly a high-risk, high-reward decision. If accomplished, Larry Bird would need some major props for sticking to his guns and getting marquee talent at a bargain. He'd finally get that second All Star caliber player to pair with DG 33. Iverson may literally be the Answer the Pacers have been looking for to help get them back on the winning road. Sometimes big risks pay off huge. Just ask 2008 GM of the year Danny Ainge about taking huge risks by bringing in big-name talent to a previously wretched team.
0 recs |
5 comments
Comments
Good post
You made a lot of sense. I’m already with the Iverson sentiment. My feeling is, the team’s biggest basketball needs have already been met (defensive improvement, low risk depth guys). Now their biggest financial needs could be addressed with Iverson. Love him or hate him, he sells jerseys and tickets (as you pointed out). And if he plays to his potential, he’s an All-Star talent with a chip on his shoulder; there’s plenty of NBA vets that will watch how Iverson performs in a one year stint this season (whether it be with us, or someone else) and it will influence their future plans. What Indiana needs is some “legitimacy,” and if AI is successful here and the Pacers can fight for a five or six seed with him, that will go a long way in the cred department.
All that said, I agree that there would be some difficulties. Watson and Dahntay Jones would have to split their time playing with Iverson and Ford because of defensive deficiencies and size concerns. Maybe a small starting 5 of Ford/Iverson/Jones/Granger/Murphy? I don’t know.
I also don’t think this is realistic considering precedent. I doubt Bird does anything to really shake things up anymore this year, but you never know.
"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"
by LukeNukem on Aug 9, 2009 11:48 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
small? that'd be a TINY starting 5
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
by psvirsky on Aug 9, 2009 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
they wont...
start those 5.
With Iverson –
Ford/Watson…. still havent decided. I figure Ford… but either way.
Iverson
Granger
Murphy
Hibbert
Without Iverson –
Ford/Watson
Rush
Granger
Murphy
Hibbert
I don’t think there is any way that the signing of Jones is going to prevent Rush from starting. The only way Rush doesn’t start is if Dunleavy comes back healthy as a horse.
~SHaFF!~
The Little Sports Blog That Could:
http://www.thelittlesportsblog.blogspot.com/
by SHaFF87 on Aug 9, 2009 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jeez guys!
I said “maybe” and had a question mark followed by “I don’t know.”
Anyway, if Rush was a solid enough defender, he could start along with Iverson and a true PG, but the only reason I mention Jones challenging for a starting spot would be to bring some offense off the bench. Sometimes it just works out that way, where the defensive specialist ends up starting and only playing like 20 minutes a night (like Jones did in Denver). I would just worry about such an undersized guard rotation without some true lockdown defenders in the mix.
"You're hitting the wrong person. Don't you know you're hitting Ron Artest?"
by LukeNukem on Aug 9, 2009 10:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
fair enough...
good arguments. That is exactly what happened in Denver. I just feel like we’ve somewhat promised the starting job to Rush. But for some reason i have a feeling Dunleavy might be back… maybe very early in the season. That is going to be a fun thing to watch the pacers manage. I’d like to see who they start with all those guys to pick from.
~SHaFF!~
The Little Sports Blog That Could:
http://www.thelittlesportsblog.blogspot.com/
by SHaFF87 on Aug 10, 2009 2:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
















