Tinsley, Pacers Ready To Move On
Jamaal Tinsleyis officially gone. Hmph.
For some reason, the news of Tinsley's buyout a couple of days ago didn't generate the personal elation I always imagined it would. I guess there are good reasons for that since he wasn't part of the team last year, physically he already was gone. Also, a buyout was the only destination this train was headed after the trade options dried up at the trade deadline.
Still, overall the ceremonial parting of the ways left me relieved (it's over!) but certainly not elated. I was happy that the Pacers were able to scrounge up $4 million cap relief on their $40 million mistake several years ago, but cap space never brings me out of my chair cheering.
In the end, I guess I was already past the Tinsley Era and I didn't realize it. Just happened with the near daily speculation about the team's future and what the roster will look like in October of 2011.
So while Tinsley and the Pacers move on in different directions, I'm heading out on vacation today. But here are a few links of interest regarding Tins and the Pacers:
- Tinsley buyout will affect Pacers for next 2 seasons
Mike Wells wraps up the numbers on Tinsley's buyout and mentions that the Pacers may only carry 14 players next year. I hope they do since it would give the team flexibility to add an extra player on the cheap from the D-League or elsewhere if there are injuries and a certain position is needed, plus it saves a little cake. - Andrew Perna digs into the the Pacers plans
Andrew Perna takes a close look at the restoration job Larry Bird is in the middle of as we've discussed here often. Real nice break down of how the team is setting up for the future in an unsettled NBA. - Walsh plans to talk with Tinsley
Speaking of moving on, Frank Isola reports that Donnie Walsh plans to talk with Jamaal Tinsley, supposedly about joining the Knicks. Now that would be interesting.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’ve got similar feelings on Tinsley. I guess it’s not a surprise that this is how things turned out but there were random flickers of hope here and there that a trade could occur. It’s jus tbeen so long now in the process that it’s hard to a reaction stronger than “meh, glad it’s over”.
The Real GM article was nice, good to see other people agree with our optimism. Although it is tough sometimes to sit back and reflect that what we’re most excited about is having a good cap situation for 2 years from now. We’re not really all that excited about having a good year (although I’m sure we’re all hoping for it, just not getting out hopes up too much). Expectations sure do change.
As for Tinsley to NYC, personally, I’ve always been a big fan of his style of play when he is healthy and putting his all in. If he went to another team and played well, I would still be a fan. However, I wonder if he has the conditioning to succeed under D’Antoni.
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
I wish we’d find out already who (if anyone) the Pacers will get in the Quisy to Boston move.
I am dying to get this roster shaped up!
GO PACERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by MagicianJobFoster on Jul 24, 2009 2:15 PM EDT reply actions
Tinsley was simply addition by subtraction. I remember when we drafted the guy and how high expectations were after his first season. I don’t think he will be successful where ever he goes. We will all see flashes, like we saw in Indiana. But, JT putting together a successfu l 82 game season isn’t going to happen.
Sad
it is a sad thing that jamaal tinsley was such a bust. his attitude was that of you tube starbury twitterbury or whatever he was calling himself… strangely enough you mention that he might go to ny, doesnt that make sense. If anyone did watch any of starbury the other day, i can quote him and also jamaal can relate to in his rant about “WHO WANTS TO BE A BUM FOR 20 MILLION DOLLARS!!!” Maybe they can hang out and bum it up together.


























