Indy Cornrows: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Along The Olentangy for Ohio State Fans!

Why drafting for character and hustle matters over "talent"

Yes, the "Psycho T" backlash here is pretty evident. If you listen to the Tyler Hansbrough Haters, they say that he has no ceiling. He's a poor man's Jeff Foster (scary, indeed). He's all hustle, no talent. In today's NBA, for some that translates into "bench player." For some, Hansbrough at 13 was akin to simply passing on the pick entirely. They might as well have drafted Fredrick Weis' younger brother "Willy."

Man of Pace:

Tyler is not going to be the player people think he will be.

Tyler is too slow to play professional defense. I expect to see him embarrassed regularly for several years on the court. Imagine how Dwight Howard will be blocking his shot off his forehead regularly.

Thirty One:

Personally I think they can take this draft and shove it. They got nothing in either round I care to see on the court. A.J. is a scumbag who has been arrested multiple times and Hansbrough was loathed by almost every non-Carolina fan in the country. I can’t even fake an interest in watching these two guys play basketball.

And my personal favorite (because it is just THAT bat shit crazy) is by the ironically named the common sense avenger:

The organization has this mindset that every white guy could be the next Larry Bird. They continue to keep drafting hacks in the hopes they might strike gold (Scott haskin, Greg Dreiling, etc) The team got lucky with Rik Smits, and they only got 4-5 good years out of him(by the way,where is our 2nd round pick from last year?) The pacers continue their racord of 1 out of about every 6 1st round picks worth a crap( Bender=turd harrington=turd haskin=turd)

Forget the fact that Scott Haskins was drafted 16 years ago and Greg Dreiling 23 years ago. Forget that the last few Pacers drafts featured guys named Brandon Rush (black), Danny Granger (black), Roy Hibbert (black), and Shawne Williams (black). You have to appreciate a special kind of "fan" who thinks that a team whose roster is 90% black, and who hasn't drafted a white guy since Austin Croshere back in 1997 has a hard on for finding "the next Larry Bird." 

Anyway, a few other comments post-draft riffed on the debate of talent v. character. One of the was mine. I wrote this just after the Hansbrough pick:

The Pacers are rebuilding with "high effort" players, not "upside" guys with questionable character. We tried that already, and it got us no where. They are also waiting until some of the huge salary players (Dunleavy, Murphy, Tinsely, etc.) come off the books. This will allow them to go out and sign some marquis players.

My comment was greeted with responses that argued for a more boom-or-bust approach by the Pacers. Why not take a risk on some talent? some wondered. For many, Hansbrough is too "safe," too predictable. Many just flat out hate Hansbrough, but I think you can dismiss those people as "haters." When I guy dominates in college for four years, he doesn't "suck." 

The reason Indiana drafted Hansbrough is because of his work ethic, hustle, and drive. Those traits were key in his college success, and they are traits many people look for when they watch real basketball. In addition, Hansbrough's personality off the court was very attractive to Pacers brass. This is a smart, polite, earnest kid who just wants to play basketball. With Hansbrough, you know exactly what you are getting, and for a team looking to scrub away the terrible image it had built with players like Jamal Tinsley, Stephen Jackson, and Shawn Williams, guys like Hansbrough, Granger, and Rush are the kinds of people you need.

Indiana wants hard workers, not idiots who shoot at people in strip club parking lots.

Now, one of the people Pacers fans were hoping would still be around at #13 was Brandon Jennings. Jennings, you may recall, was drafted at #10 by the Bucks. Now, despite Jennings' talent, he is a 19-year-old player with zero college experience. He's also got a big mouth. Gee, that sounds like a great combo.

Well, recently, Brandon had a chat with his friend, rapper Joe Budden. Now, you tell me-- Should the Pacers have made a push to get a player like this:

On next season in Milwaukee ...

Budden: You better worry about Ramon Sessions, diggin' in your a**, pause.
Jennings: He's not going to be here. [inaudible] That money is going to Charlie.
Budden: N****, Ramon Sessions is gonna be there.
Jennings: I doubt it.
Budden: They ain't go no other guards.
Jennings: Ridnour.
Budden: N****, get that bum-a** n**** outta here.
Jennings: He's going to be a backup.
Budden: To who?
Jennings: To who? Who else n****?

On what happened on draft night ...

Budden: Who was hatin' on you?
Jennings: Jay Bilas.
Budden: What happened? You ran in the draft late or some dumb s*** like a loser?
Jennings: No, I was at the hotel. This is what happened right. My agent is like "Well, we ain't hear nothing .We ain't have no guarantee." So we makin' phone calls and s*** and n***** is saying like "The workouts is great and everything and he's the best point guard but we don't know yet, we just don't know."
Budden: They didn't say that about Rick Rubio, number one, and number two they didn't say you the best point guard. They said your jump shot is shaky, you got some potential, but your work ethic is bull****. You averaged 3 points.
Jennings: You're a liar. I know you're lying now.
Budden: I'm just telling you what they said.
Jennings: That ain't nothing but a college person.
Budden: Just tell me what happened. You end up running in the draft? I tunred it off after that.
Jennings: No, n****, I came out there and made my appearance n**** and I had the best appearance out of all them n******. And I was the best dressed, they said, by the way. I was the best dressed.

On whether he'll start next season ...

Budden: You think you gonna start for real though?
Jennings: I don't know, actually, I really don't know.
Budden: I heard that n**** Scott Skiles is an a**h***.
Jennings: That n**** tough, that n**** tough though. There must be a reason he liked me. There must be a reason.

On Ricky Rubio and the Knicks ...

Budden: Let me know when Minnesota get there. So I can watch Rubio light your f****** a** up. I never seen a n**** hate on Rubio so much.
Jennings: [inaudible]
Budden: You know what's funny? You're the only guard in the draft talking s*** about Rubio.
Jennings: The other n***** are scared.
Budden: What are you going to do when Rubio comes to the Knicks?
Jennings: Rubio is not coming, they are not giving up Rubio. You got Jordan Hill, you happy with that?
Budden: I don't really know enough about Jordan Hill to be happy ... I'm happy with Toney Douglas.
Jennings: I know they were booing this n****.
Budden: What does that mean? They boo everybody n****.
Jennings: If it was Stpehen Curry, them n***** would've went crazy in there.
Budden: Shut the f*** up, you don't even know nothing about New York basketball.
Jennings: F*** the Knicks, them n***** skipped out on me.
Budden: Oh man, you feel to the Knicks like I do about Jay-Z? [Laughs] Yo, the Knicks is your Jay-Z?
Jennings: F*** the Knicks, them n***** is always going to be weak.
Budden: This is where I f****** hang up on your f****** ass for talking stupid.
Jennings: Duhon ain't gonna get it done.

Clearly, this is a stellar individual who the Pacers can use to scrub clean their dirty image.

Jennings is a top 10 pick. He's also a classless prick, and such people do not thrive in Indiana. You can make whatever judgement you want about Midwesterners and their "values," but the bottom line is the player and the team must play the game the right way and conduct thmeselves as professionals.

Otherwise, they're garbage, and not worth spending hard earned money watching.

Remember, the Pacers have to compete with the Colts for fans. You think a Colts player would last five seconds on that team if they were ever caught saying something like what Jennings says? Not only does he insult future NBA colleagues and other NBA teams, he uses the word "nigger" about as many times as Southern Plantation owner circa 1865.

And please, save me the excuses that "he's only 19" or the pathetic one that "when black men say 'nigger' it's ok." No, and no.

If you are wanting to become a PROFESSIONAL, you must act like one. Even at 19. If you are unable to, go to college or something. Jennings is talented enough to get a full ride to a great school. If he chooses not to do that, then he is expected to be as mature as someone who went through school. To play the professional's game, you must be expected to act professional. If this were someone on an NFL team saying these kinds of things, he'd get pile driven into a goal post by one of the veterans. This is a big reason why the NFL thrives while pro basketball dies.

People like football players better than basketball players. Footbal players, in general, act more professional. There is also a cutoff age (see Maurice Clarrett). Take note, NBA.

I won't go into the silly "n-word debate." "Nigger" is a derogatory word created by white people with the expressed intent to demean black people. When black people use it themselves to describe themselves, they demean themselves. Whether they know it or not, they do. And if you are trying to convey that you are someone worth a damn, calling yourself or other people "nigger" is not advisable no matter what race you are. End of cultural lecture.

This is what it means to draft character over talent. Brandon Jennings might have more talent than Tyler Hansbrough, but after listening to Jennings little chat, it's pretty clear he is an immature punk in desperate need of some growing up. He can do that on someone else's dime. I do not pay the price of admission to watch Larry Bird and Jim O'Brien baby sit spoiled children. I expect to see grown men compete passionately and professionally in a game they love. If I don't get that, there are plenty of other things going on to entertain me. And while other cities and teams enjoy the Jennings-like player, Indiana has had enough of them. Give us the Grangers and the Hansbroughs. The guys who give you exactly what you expect.

For the Indiana Pacers right now, that is what they need. Like it or not.

0 recs  |  Comment 19 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Hands down best post I've read here.

Glad to make a cameo,

My comments were in the heat of the moment and I was still recovering from my draft disappointments. I have since then read about him and watched HANS play now I can see that HE IS going to help our team to wins …… I must admit I had been hoping for trades and or to see some something special in the way of a “high ceiling” type player.

I.E. Jennings/Teauge

That is a real eye opener on Jennings He and SKiles are going to get along smashingly I assume

by Man of Pace on Jun 29, 2009 4:39 PM EDT reply actions  

I am

behind the Hansbrough pick as well. I like the direction and thought process of taking him. But, in all honestly, I still would rather have Jennings. One, he already DID play professionally , hes not wanting to become one (he got $2 million overseas). He is from Compton, so since he has played a year professionally, he should speak like he went to Harvard. Are some of his comments completely ridiculous and naive sounding, yea. But you are writing him off before he has ever stepped foot on a court.

 The reason he did not go to college, is he could not get a qualifying score on the SAT (at least that is the unwritten word on it.) And finally, the reason the NFL is more popular than the NBA has nothing to do with the reason you stated in my opinion. It is an outdoor sport that holds 70,000 people. It is the most heavily wagered on sport in America by far, and there are only 16 games (imagine getting to only watch MJ or Kobe or Lebron 16!! times a year??? – the per game popularity would be through the roof as well.) Plenty of NFL players speak just like Brandon jennings does. The best Defensive Player in the histor of the NFL (Lawrence Taylor) wrote an entrie book on how he was coked out during games, wrote a check BEFORE THE SEASON to his team to pay the total he would accrue for the season on his missed weight training sessions, and openly said some of the most ridiculous things ever.

by captain flitzy on Jun 29, 2009 5:03 PM EDT reply actions  

why did we pick a thief in the second round???

by dbcb on Jun 29, 2009 5:51 PM EDT reply actions  

exactly..

I guess what i meant to say by the above paragraph is just because a 19 year old kid is a little cocky and a little un-educated and can’t speak well, doesn’t mean he’s not a good fit for our basketball team. Plus, Larry has done a great job of building a great culture around here recently, you trust in his teammates to turn him around. If they fully believed the good character thing, why take a guy like Price? Im guessing because it’s behind him and people grow.

by captain flitzy on Jun 29, 2009 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ok first of all if you are titling a post “Why drafting for character and hustle matters over talent” you probably shouldn’t be referencing the Indiana Pacers. We drafted Brandon Rush last year who has been arrested for failure to appear in court after multiple driving incidents (He was driving on the wrong side of the road and without insurance, rumored to be high also). And now A.J. Price who has quite the rap sheet. I will grant you that Rush’s incidents were minor but I believe they do disqualify him from having outstanding character, and at the least he’s not exactly a model citizen.

Again my issue is with not trying to swing for the fences. My pick at that spot is Jrue Holiday. Maybe he turns out to be terrible, or maybe not. In the end I would have had fun rooting for him to succeed. I personally want players on the team that I can root for. The Colts have repeatedly taken guys that I enjoy watching play football. The Dwight Freeney, Bob Sanders, Peyton Mannings of the sport. These are guys who I want to watch play as much as possible. I don’t feel the same way about Hansbrough. In the end I’m a paying customer. I’ve been to lots of Pacer games and bought ton’s of merchandise over the years, I show my support with my wallet. I’m the kid who grew up watching Reggie Miller’s ever game. I’d love to get that love for the team back to where it was but that’s not going to happen watching Tyler Hansbrough, especially when I know there were players I think could have helped the team more down the road still available.

So why should I have to love the Hansbrough pick? I don’t believe he’ll be able to score or rebound in the NBA. He plays below the rim too much and relies too much on junk shots and free throw attempts to get his points. I don’t believe those two things will be available to him in the NBA. Maybe his defense and hustle will be awesome, but I don’t think that will be enough to justify giving him serious minutes on the court. I guess we’ll have to just revisit this debate in a couple of years to know for sure.

by ThirtyOne on Jun 30, 2009 8:49 AM EDT reply actions  

Your opinion

Your opinion about Hanbrough is your own. Clearly, Larry Bird thinks you’re wrong. It’s just that simple. If you are correct and Hansbrough becomes the bust you are predicting, then bully for you. But, right now, the guy who is paid to run the team and evaluate talent thinks you’re wrong.

You can either choose to accept his judgment or analysis, or not.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Jun 30, 2009 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

True, however the fact is that my money goes to pay Bird’s salary not the other way around. The burden of proof is on Larry, not me. If Hansbrough doesn’t work out you can bet that my money won’t go to the Pacers until he is gone.

by ThirtyOne on Jun 30, 2009 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Hansbrough doesn't work out

It’s another nail in Bird’s coffin as President of the Pacers. He busted the Shawne Williams pick and he can ill afford to bust another one. Again, this is why he took Hansbrough. He is a safe pick. Most disagree with you that he will suck at the NBA level. Most think he will be “solid.”

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Jun 30, 2009 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good post BBS. Glad to see I’m not the only crossover from Stampede Blue! You are spot on about the character issues. The entire NBA is flawed and, as you say, it is dying because of it. The Hansbrough pick is a good one. You can’t teach hustle and drive. That is why so many young players flame out in my opinion. They feel entitled. Bull. There is not entitlement. You have to earn it. And that is something Hansbrough will do.

One final thing to remember, since alot of us are talking about Reggie: The Pacers were widely criticized for taking a bald kid from Cal. He turned out to be one of the best ever because he loved what he did and worked hard at it.

by 2ndBlueGeneration on Jun 30, 2009 11:29 AM EDT reply actions  

your right, you see nba players in the news all the time for fighting dogs, drinking and driving, shooting themselves, getting busted for steroids, and killing people.

oh wait

by dbcb on Jun 30, 2009 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

The NFL does have just as many problems as the NBA. I think the NFL has just done a better job of disciplining their problem employees. The NBA should have stepped in and terminated Jamaal’s contract for us after all the problems he went through. Sadly though the NBA Players Association is much stronger than the NFL’s.

by ThirtyOne on Jun 30, 2009 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Your cause and effect chain is broken

Might want to go get that fixed. Your entire post touts Hans as being the right pick for the Pacers because he has character and drive, even if he might not have the most talent. Why do talent and character have to be mutually exclusive? I have not heard one bad thing about Ty Lawson, Teague, or Blair regarding off court exploits. I’m not going to sit here and act like I hear everything about everyone, but I can’t recall any problems with these three. And the beauty of these three is that they all have higher upside than Hans. Talent + Character.

You spend about half of your post talking about Brandon Jennings and his bad character (and a forth of it on racist words he was using). I think the language thing goes without saying. And I’ll admit, I was one who thought that we should get Jennings if he fell to 13. But, and this is key, HE DIDN’T. There is absolutely no justification for picking Hans to be had in analyzing Jennings; people didn’t disagree with the pick because of Jennings. People disagreed with the pick because of the perceived lack of upside. What your post is attempting to do is to state that not as talented players who hustle are inately better people than those who are more talented but may not hustle as hard. That is rediculous. Talent, character and hustle are not mutually exclusive despite your pleadings to the contrary.

And one last thing, more often than not, the numbers in the win-loss columns are why people spend their hard earned money. Its the reason that attendance was at 683,125 in 2003 (remember that team? 61-21, feature such stand up gentlemen as JO, Artest, and Tinsley?) while that number slipped to 501,092 for the 07-08 season. Yes, I know the Brawl happened in that span, but I’m pretty sure that if you look at the highest attendance in the league, it will be directly proportional to wins (even if there are outside basketball instances). I’m sick of this “I’m a Hoosier and I won’t support these thugs” talk.

by TheHawk5 on Jun 30, 2009 12:49 PM EDT reply actions   3 recs

The pick

People disagreed with the pick for a variety of reasons, and the lack of upside was one of them. PArt of the argument for taking Hansbrough is that while he may lack upside in comparison to players like Jennings, upside means absolutely nothing if the player is a douchebag.

And no, my argument drafting not-as-talented players who hustle instead of douchebag players with more talent is not “rediculous.” If the team is winning, and is full of a bunch of asshats, people will not support the team. They know that in the end the team will not win anything. What you fail to grasp is that for many people The Brawl revealed the character flaws of people like Stephen Jackson and Jamal Tinsely. Those two in particular are known to be lazy, uninspiring players more interested in strip clubs and bars than playing basketball. One of the reasons why people have, in some respects, forgiven Ron Artest is they see just how hard he practices and plays.

In fact, if the Pacers re-signed Ron Artest right now, I don’t think many in Indiana would have a problem with it.

Hoosiers are not going to cheer for people who do not work at becoming better players. They will not cheer for people who do not have passion for their sport. It’s got nothing to do with “thugs” or anything like that. If you are a professional who works hard and wants to better himself and sacrifice for the team, Hoosiers will cheer you till their voices go hoarse. If you are a me-first douchebag more interested in your stats, Hoosier fans will tune you out. It’s just how it is, bro. Don’t like it? Root for the Lakers.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Jun 30, 2009 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Okay. . .

Well, I’ll take your rebuttal in parts:
1) Yes, one justification for taking Hans is that he’s not a “douchebag,” but neither is Teague, Lawson, or Blair. If not being a douchebag is the criteria, why not pick those guys? Keeping in mind that those guys have more upside, why was Tyler the obvious pick over higher upside guys who don’t have character problems? Again, I’m not even going to discuss Jennings because he was already gone at that point. Any character issues with Jennings are absolutely irrelevant to problems people have with the Hansbrough pick.

2) I did not say that picking a not-as-talented player who hustles over a douchebag with more talent is rediculous. What I said was that your insinuation that players who hustle and aren’t as talented are better people than those who are more talented was rediculous. If it came down to two players, one of which was less talented but had high character and hustled and one of which was a super-talented douche, I can make an argument (and would probably support one as well) that its a better idea to take the high character guy. But you haven’t answered why you think the upside guy automatically has character issues, which was my biggest problem with your post.

3) You may be right about the Hoosier fans (which I am one of by the way, as well as a season ticket holder) not being willing to come to games to watch thugs and assholes play. But I’m getting sick of the justification for doing things being “Well, at least he’s a good guy.” Like I said before, being a great basketball player does not automatically make you a douchebag (see e.g. Miller, Reggie; Granger, Danny; etc.). So why is it that the best thing that people could point to on draft day was “at least he won’t shoot anyone”? That’s a piss poor reason to draft someone if that is the only reason to draft him.

4) I apologize, I was unaware that you are the Pacers Fan Police and any opinion that differs with yours or questions your logic on any matter Pacers automatically deems you unworthy of being a Pacers fan. Half of the fun of following sports is questioning the decisions that people who are paid to make decisions make. Hell, the entire fantasy sports industry is built on the premise that normal people think that they can do a better job of constructing a team. You’re using the good old GW Bush thinking “If you’re not behind the war, you’re not behind the soldiers.” Just because I may disagree with a personel move doesn’t make me less of a fan.

by TheHawk5 on Jun 30, 2009 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ugh, I now have to respond point-for-point

1) Probably because, in Larry Bird’s estimation, Tyler Hansbrough is better than those guys. You obviously disagree with that, which is fine. But, you aren’t the Pacers President. Bird is. If Teague, Lawson, or Blair end up having better pro careers than Hansbrough, then you have a point. since none of them have played a lick of pro ball yet, you don’t have a point. Jennings was used as an example of a player many were hoping Indy would get (high talent, low character).

2) And again, you said was:

People disagreed with the pick because of the perceived lack of upside. What your post is attempting to do is to state that not as talented players who hustle are inately better people than those who are more talented but may not hustle as hard. That is rediculous.
If you think it is better to draft lazy players with talent (because players who do not hustle 100% are “inately” lazy players) then it is very easy for me to dismiss your opinion as the mad rantings of someone who is clearly in the minority when it comes to evaluating talent. If a player is not giving maximum effort at every possible moment, he is lazy. Lazy players are avoided at all costs for good reason: They do not return on their investment. See Jamal Tinsely for an example.

3) No, it isn’t a piss poor reason. People do not want to shell out hard earned money to watch some douchebag act like an idiot night in and out. There is nothing wrong with expecting the players who pay millions of dollars to act professional. And if you are looking to build the foundation of a club on hard work and discipline, taking an Allen Iverson-like player (high talent, low character) is not the way to go. Again, if you disagree with that ideal, root for Denver or something. Your opinion is not shared by most Pacers fans. If it was, Jermaine O’Neal, Ron Artest, Stephen Jackson, and Jamal Tinsely would not have been run out of town.

4) Um what? This point made absolutely no sense. I’m happy to take in the opinions of others as long as they are informed opinions. And when I hear someone state:

What your post is attempting to do is to state that not as talented players who hustle are inately better people than those who are more talented but may not hustle as hard. That is rediculous.
That tells me your opinion is not informed. Hard work is EVERYTHING in sports. Everything. The best player in the NFL is Peyton Manning. He is also the hardest worker. The hardest worker the Pacers ever had was Reggie Miller, another guy deemed to have “limited upside” out of college, but was known to have a tremendous work ethic. I’m happy to listen to your opinions, but it is damn hard to to you seriously when you say stuff like that.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Jun 30, 2009 9:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Okay, we'll agree to disagree

But I think you are missing my point, and maybe that’s my fault for not explaining it better. I’ll pose these questions: Does Danny Granger hustle? Is he one of your hard-workers? The obvious answers to both of us is yes. However, you never hear any description of Danny containing the word hustle. The only players you ever hear of “hustling” are the Brian Cardinals, Josh McRoberts, Tyler Hansbroughs of the world. When one has to point out that somebody hustles, that’s a red flag to me. I also believe that everyone should hustle at all times, so when that’s counted as one of your “attributes” it means you are compensating for the lack of other attributes to tout.

Your initial post champions hustle, but in my opinion all players hustle unless they are labeled as lazy. I’m not advocating we draft a guy who has been labled as lazy, I’m saying that the impression I got from your post was that if “hustles” wasn’t a listed attribute, then that player is automatically a non-hustling, bad character guy. That is what I disagreed with. Adding into the equation that hustle is not mentioned generally for players with higher skill levels (only time “Micheal Jordan” and “hustle” are in the same sentence, we’re talking about gambling), and it looks like you would rather have a team full of limited upside guys who’s main contribution is that they try as hard as they can (which, again, should go without saying).

As for the piss-poor reason comment, I agree that these professionals should act like professionals. So when the ONLY justification for drafting someone (and I’m not saying this is what happened with Hans) is that they are professional, why don’t we just draft some guy from Harvard who will act right? What’s the difference? Everyone should be professional so why should that be rewarded? Like Chris Rock says, you’re doing what you’re supposed to be doing, that doesn’t deserve a medal.

by TheHawk5 on Jul 1, 2009 11:32 AM EDT reply actions  

well so far know one has given tyler a chance and we havent even had preseason games, i don’t know what everyone is expecting out of this draft. the class of 2009 was shitty, it sure as hell wasn’t a wade/james/mello class. so i think before we all just sit on our asses and judge him we give him a chance to see if he can play with the “big boys.” If you want to bitch about anyone, it should be tinsley.

by gmurdak on Jul 2, 2009 10:07 PM EDT reply actions  

talent vs. hustle/character

Guys, I think most pro players hustle and play hard most of the time. BUT, Hans is on another level. NO play is ever taken off, he is always engaged in the game, and the game only. No other crap. And his talent and athleticism are overlooked (Rush has already commented on his hops in summer league). He has one big flaw in his game- a slow, low release. What rookie doesn’t have something wrong with his game though? You think Teague and Lawson’s defense wouldn’t be a huge liability? Hans game needs work, but what rookie’s doesn’t? It’s his determination and attitude and history of success suggest that he will do what he needs to become a very effective NBA player.

by BenD on Jul 3, 2009 10:44 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Indiana Pacers. Email: indycornrows@gmail.com
Start posting about the Pacers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Pacers_pimp_small
Fantasy Love
Small
Simple Idea
Tumblr_l54xl7wl4b1qayczvo1_500_small
Stephenson not allowed in the Fieldhouse
Small
Anthony Randolph To Pacers Deal Denied By Donnie Walsh
Small
All-In for Kevin Love
Small
Roy Hibbert's Area 55... get into it!
Small
Indiana Pacers
Small
Our Starting Line-Up: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Small
J.Crawford ansd J.Smith Could put us in the conference finals
Pacers_pimp_small
I'm not giving up on this Josh Smith thing.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

LAS VEGAS - JULY 24:  Chauncey Billups #4 and Jeff Green #12 of the 2010 USA Basketball Men's National Team try to stop Kevin Durant #5 of the 2010 USA Basketball Men's National Team during a USA Basketball showcase at the Thomas & Mack Center on July 24 2010 in Las Vegas Nevada.  (Photo by Ethan Miller/Getty Images) +4 updates

FIBA World Championship 2010: Team USA Blows Out Angola, Advances To Quarterfinals

PHOENIX - SEPTEMBER 05:  Sue Bird #10 of the Seattle Storm puts up a shot against the Phoenix Mercury in Game Two of the Western Conference Finals during the 2010 WNBA Playoffs at US Airways Center on September 5 2010 in Phoenix Arizona.  NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that by downloading and or using this photograph User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement.  (Photo by Christian Petersen/Getty Images) +1 updates

Bird's Game-Winner Sends Seattle Storm Into WNBA Finals

NEW YORK CITY NY - AUGUST 12:  Kevin Durant #5 looks on during the World Basketball Festival USAB Showcase at Radio City Music Hall on August 12 2010 in New York City. (Photo by Chris Trotman/Getty Images for Nike) +4 updates

FIBA World Championships 2010: Team USA Routs Iran 88-51, Clinches Top Spot In Group B

More from SBNation.com >


Manager

Iclogo_new_small Tom Lewis

Editor

Reggie2_330_050331_small spstevenson