Larry Bird and Tyler Hansbrough Don't Care What You Think
Both Larry Bird and Tyler Hansbrough addressed the media at Conseco Fieldhouse seperately within a stretch of about ten minutes.
Bruno has it covered here, but in listening to both deal with questions about Hansbrough game translating to the NBA and what concerns either had, it was apparent that they don't care what you or I or anyone analyzing this draft thinks.
Bird appeared worn out, like a guy who spent way too much time with a phone to his ear all day. His comments were brief and direct. He thinks Hansbrough can play right away, has a better offensive game than the doubters think and can't wait to watch him throw his body around. He wasn't trying to convince anyone he made the right pick. Hansbrough was simply Bird's pick and he's ready to move ahead with him.
For Hansbrough's part, he's used to his role as a polarizing figure on the basketball court. He too spoke directly as he blew through questions about his game and what others think. What was quickly apparent was that Hansbrough has absolutely no interest in diagnosing why people either love him or hate him, it's just how it is. Like Bird, Hansbrough didn't waste any breath defending his game as worthy of the Pacers pick. There was no doubt in his voice, just a sense of anticipation to begin showing what he can do.
Now where is the ball? Let's play.
68 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm gonna take a break from this team for a while...this has just worn me out...
But answer me this…if Danny Granger doesn’t MIRACULOUSLY fall to us a few years ago, how bad is this team? Wouldn’t Bird be long gone by now?
I’m frustrated as a fan and it’s not just this draft. This just happens to be my tipping point. I’ve disagreed with every draft pick outside of Granger that this team has made since I’ve been a fan (‘97). Every single one. And you know what? With the possible exception of Al Harrington, I’ve been correct in questioning them (though I’ll point out he cost us a two 1st rounders and I’ll reserve judgment on Hibbert).
Additionally, I’ve disagreed with almost every post-Brawl trade (the only ones I’ve agreed with were my least favorite pick ever [Shawne] being shipped and dumping an injured O’Neal). And guess what? The trades haven’t worked out either.
Sure, I hope I’m wrong and this is a great draft class we just had, but why be optimistic? What proof do we have that this team is even an adequate judge of talent. My gut has been right so much more often then theirs that they’re essentially guilty until proven innocent at this point in my books.
And what’s worse is I cheer for equally inept front offices in other sports. The Mariners paid top dollar to the Richie Sexsons, Carlos Silvas, and Jerrod Washburns of the world while trading their entire farm system for Eric Bedard. The Broncos just traded away one of the best QBs in the league when their strength was offense and their holes were on defense. Why do I invest so much of myself in such inept franchses?
I hate sports sometimes. I really do.
The picks absolutly suck .....
Tyler is not going to be the player people think he will be.
Tyler is too slow to play professional defense. I expect to see him embarrassed regularly for several years on the court. Imagine how Dwight Howard will be blocking his shot off his forehead regularly.
AJ Price?!!?!!? are you kidding me, won’t even make the team, he cant shoot and he is too small and slow to play defense
It was a bad run Larry, sorry JOB you’re only as good as the players you have to work with.
We now have the least athletic team in the league.
Thank G that both of them have no more year on their contract. I really hope we can get a GM and a coach that will keep Danny Granger here after his contract is up. Because I don’t see a winning run back to the playoffs after last night.
re: Hansbrough, Man of Pace
“Tyler is not going to be the player people think he will be.”
Well, hard to tell til he plays. not like there was a top 5 or 10 pick available. He won’t block shots. given. He will out hustle almost everyone he plays against. will probably be a good rebounder and better scorer than people think.
But, Larry should know that 6’9" white guys who aren’t great leapers don’t amount to anything in this league. duh.
And hooray for Che the murderer! You know a lot about politics too, evidently.
I'm out.
That’s great that Bird doesn’t care what I think about his draft, it’s apparent that the Pacers have more than enough fans who will pay to see their product on the court. Wait, never mind the team is going bankrupt isn’t it? Oh so maybe they should care what the fans think of their draft pick, they are wanting my money, aren’t they?
Personally I think they can take this draft and shove it. They got nothing in either round I care to see on the court. A.J. is a scumbag who has been arrested multiple times and Hansbrough was loathed by almost every non-Carolina fan in the country. I can’t even fake an interest in watching these two guys play basketball.
At this point I’m starting to wonder if my unconditional love of the Pacers is a good thing or not. Maybe I shouldn’t be so loyal to this franchise. They’ve never won a title and they haven’t even been relevant in four years. Why should I be bound to this team just because I’m from Indiana. So I think I’m going to become a free agent fan this year. I’ll still follow the Pacers but I’m entertaining the notion of moving on. It’s obvious at this point the Pacers and I want different things in life. I want titles and it wants to be a borderline playoff team. It’s probably time I start at least playing the field a little bit.
Right now I got my eyes on the Thunder. Yeah their name sucks and the city isn’t much better but I like how they carry themselves. They’re young and have a lot of nice players, including two former Hoosiers who I so badly wanted to see in a Pacer uni. Maybe they can lure me away from Pacer land. I’m not sure, but I’m willing to let them take me on a few dates, buy me some drinks and see where it leads. I’m not saying I’m gonna go to bed with them, but I’m entertaining the idea.
The Thunder indeed look really good
I think taking Curry or Rubio would have took them up a big notch but they have some really good young talent.
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
Yeah
At first I thought those guys were the right pick for the Thunder. But if Westbrook is really going to stay at the point the right pick was Harden. Curry has maintained that he wants to play the point in the NBA and we know that is where Rubio is going to play.
sure
But I just don’t see Harden turning into a starting 2. If I’m wrong than it’s a great pick and they have 4 really good starters with several good role player backups. I guess I’d rather have 2 guards that are both really talented and can handle the ball. If Rubio or Curry was that good at the point, I think they could start them with Westbrook. All 3 of those guys are at least 6’3. Westbrook can play D on whoever is the better opposing guard. I guess we’ll see what happens but they’ve got a good nucleus and you gotta love the Indiana connection they have
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
Imagine if the Thunder won the lottery. It wouldn’t be fair.
Not as useful as Rated-R Superstar, but, hey!, I stick my Grease watching to once a weekend.
by rollonubears on Jun 26, 2009 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions
My head still hurts...
But, I can’t abandon the Pacers. I’ve been with them too long to quit. (Maybe I just need an extra shot of aboslute in my morning coffee and I’ll be ok.)
I think it’s wise to actually let Hansbrough fail before declaring him a failure. But I’m just rational that way.
I knew your optimistic nature would have you taking this stance. You are rational and obviously you’ve always sided with the Pacers front office on all decisions. Have you criticized them for a single move on this blog?
Even if Tyler is decent, which most can agree is the absolute best I could hope for, I still don’t like this pick. I didn’t like him in college and I won’t like him in the pros. He won’t do anything for us and he’s not a better option at the 4 than Murphy, who I don’t think is very good either.
to be fair
while I was hoping for Holiday as well, he’s got a real high chance of being a bust. He averaged 8 points, 3.7 assists, 2 turnovers and 30% from 3. He definitely has the potential to be a lockdown defender at PG and able to manage a team on offense, but there’s a good chance he’ll never start anywhere
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
I agree on the bust-ability of Holiday
which is probably why the Pacers stayed away, but I was ready for the risk.
Eventually you HAVE to take this sort of risk sooner or later if you want top talent. The really really talented guys normally don’t stay in school until they are a senior.
right
but was this the year to take that risk? the draft sucked. on a 2 year level, I’d much rather have a higher pick next year and take the risk then and have a role player from this year rather than take the risk this year when most of these guys are going to suck.
Simmons today compared it to being at a store’s closeout sale when the only DVD’s left are Terminator 3, The Shining, etc. and you talk yourself into the Shining even though you’ve seen it a million times and won’t watch it at home. We all talked ourselves into some of these guys, but realistically, almost all of them are going to bust. I hope we have a better shot next year at getting a seriously talented guy
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
lawson, holiday, and blair’s knees were worth the risk IMO. i don’t like spending the 13th pick on a 9th man hustle type.
I mean, I agree
I would rather have had those guys. But long-term, it would not be a big shock if Hansborough has a better career than all of those guys. I would still prefer Lawson and Blair especially, but there’s a good chance they’ll be busts.
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
EXACTLY
Im so sick of Bird drafting all the famous college players that everyone knows. This franchise is going nowhere and as someone made the point before, if Granger hadn’t fallen to us, where would be be?
we would have had a shot at rose/beasley/mayo ect last year and a shot at griffin/thabeet/harden this year lol
actually
last year, we only finished like 2 or 3 games in front of the bulls. we were honestly just 3 losses (2 if one of them was to Chicago) away from getting Rose. Of all the things that suck about where the Pacers are right now, the biggest is that we were unbelievably close to ending up with Rose.
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
I wish we could have David Kahn
or whatever his name is from the timberwolves as our GM. At least he makes some exciting moves. I bet if we would’ve made that trade with Chicago and gotten those 2 other first rounders we could’ve still gotten hansbrough and maybe a player we could be excited about.
Contending teams can draft a role player like hansbrough, but we just can’t afford to do it. We need players with potential and upside, something TH doesn’t have
one caveat
At the end of the draft I looked back to see who was still available at 26 (the Bulls second pick) and it wasn’t as good as I had originally hoped. None of the main PG’s had slipped that far. In hindsight, the ideal draft with the two Bull’s picks would have been Lawson and Blair. I probably would have shit my pants if that happened.
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
the trade went away when henderson got picked
and lets not ride kahn’s nuts yet. Lets see what he does with rubio or flynn first. he can’t keep both.
If he keeps Rubio, they’re got a pretty good core. Kevin Love is a double double machine and one of the best passing big men in the game which would of course go great with Rubio. Al Jefferson is a legitimate beast down low. They just need some wingmen. Hopefully for them they can turn Flynn into one (through trade that is)
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
Sure he can
He was interviewed last night and explained how they will fit together.
Yeah, but i just like excitement and reaching for a role player just makes me mad
Well next time you talk to Larry tell him that he better hope Holiday and Blair suck hard next year.
The fact that Blair fell so far showed that nobody trusted his knees.
Not as useful as Rated-R Superstar, but, hey!, I stick my Grease watching to once a weekend.
by rollonubears on Jun 26, 2009 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions
taking a risk on his knees that he played on for 4 years at college will be a much better risk than the risk of some random dude from europe or the congo actually ever making it int he league.
He only played 2 years. I didn’t understand Blair’s fall. Spurs got a steal. The reason that so many foreign guys were being picked was the economy. Keep them in Europe for a few years and let his team pay him.
Not as useful as Rated-R Superstar, but, hey!, I stick my Grease watching to once a weekend.
by rollonubears on Jun 26, 2009 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions
agreed
We all said yesterday that we would be disappointed if it was a boring night without any trades or fun picks. We all hoped for a trade for more picks, to get rid of Tinsley or Ford, or just to get a higher upside player.
But realistically, this draft sucked. There are likely only going to be 3-4 players drafted that will be good enough to start on a championship team (my guess: Griffin, Curry, Rubio, Lawson, Blair). So yeah we didn’t take a big step forward but it was pretty unrealistic to think we would. There just weren’t many players available that would have helped us do it. We’ll see what happens next year.
Hypothetical: if Blair, Holiday, Lawson and Mills (the guys we all wanted the most) all end up mediocre, would we still be so upset?
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
It’s more the rational that pisses me off. Why strive to be completely average when there are options that might make you great or at the least do you no harm. Isn’t that what we get with Tyler, someone who makes us no better and can’t hurt us?
i mean i agree with that
This move has zero potential to make the pacers contenders and I would hate this move in a stronger draft. I guess what I’m hoping for is that all of these guys who have a decent bust potential end up busting. It wouldn’t surprise me at all if 10 years from now there’s only one or two guys picked after Hansborough that really contributes. So yeah, the rationale sucks and I hope we don’t continue it, but in this draft it wasn’t completely stupid.
Ultimately, I’ve been hoping to get rid of JOB for a while now and I think that will definitely happen after this year. And at this point, I’m more than okay getting rid of Bird. I kept holding on for one more year, one more move, one more draft, and he just isn’t cutting it as a GM. Picking established college players really seems to be his way of doing things and that’s just not how you get stars in the NBA anymore.
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
An actual e-mail I received from a buddy this morning,
“In other news from the Indiana Pacers war room, Matt Kleinmann, 5th string center from the University of Kansas, has been signed to a 3-year guaranteed free agent deal. Said, Larry Bird, Pacers president of basketball operations, “We really couldn’t believe that a player of Matt Kleinmann’s ability went undrafted. It was hard to pass on him in the second round, but the team really could use some new laptops and I felt A.J. Price was someone who could definitely step up and help us in that department from day one. Getting three players of the quality and/or character of Tyler, A.J. and Matt should put us over the top next year.”
At least this brought a laugh to the situation.
let's just clear things up
that’s a joke, right? At this point, I have to ask
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
I know,
that’s what makes it so funny. Although Kleinmann is a white guy who works hard and hustles. Very much in a Jeff Foster mold.
is it a joke or not?
until you say explicitly it’s a joke, I’m going to have to worry
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
the price pick pisses me off more than Tyler.
a pg slowed down by a bad knee who likes to get arrested. errrr… WHAT?
yeah that pick was retarded
realistically almost no one who gets drafted that late turns into an NBA player but at least let’s get someone who has a shot at it. Price doesn’t
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
We've tot our role players
Hansboro
Rush
Hibbert
Should be able to fill out the 6th,7th and 8th spots in an NBA rotation.
Now we just need to find 4 starters to put around Danny Granger.
" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico loose a ball in the Sun? "
by aaronb on Jun 26, 2009 10:55 AM EDT reply actions 2 recs
I can agree with that but I'll go ahead and put an optimistic spin on it
If Jarret Jack continues to develop, he could be a pretty decent starting PG. And if we got HUGE upgrades at the 2 and 4, I think Hibbert could be a decent starting Center (he could definitely be as good as Ilgauskus some day). With this lineup, the 2 and 4 would need to be absolute defensive beasts but Granger, Jack and Hibbert could provide 50-60 points a game (25, 15, 10-15).
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
I still think Rush has a chance to develop into a nice starter
"My game’s like the Pythagorean Theorem. It ain’t got no answer." - Shaq
by bleedinblueandgold on Jun 27, 2009 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions
A solid move.
I think we have to be honest here that the Pacers are no where near ready to play for a championship. What sense does it make to draft a high risk player when the pieces around him are not in place? Look at Cleveland. LeBron James is arguably the best player in the NBA, depending on who you ask. But Cleveland hasn’t been able to win a championship because there is no support cast. That is what I think the Pacers are doing. Getting their pieces in place before moving on to the high-risk player. Drafting a bust can set a franchise back years, and it has happened to the Pacers over and over. When you are rebuilding, you play it safe and you don’t gamble. This is a good pick. I would rather have Hansbrough than another Jonathan Bender.
by 2ndBlueGeneration on Jun 26, 2009 11:54 AM EDT reply actions
Besides, I remember how upset people were when Reggie Miller was picked. That worked out, didn’t it?
I read a good quote somewhere on the internet today, and I apologize since I can’t remember exactly who said it to where it’s from: Teams keep looking for the next Jordan, but the next Jordan only shows up every 50 years.
by 2ndBlueGeneration on Jun 26, 2009 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions
right
The best way of looking at it from the major media today comes from Chad Ford who says the Pacers keep slapping singles and doubles instead of aiming for the fences. Then he says:
“Eventually the Pacers will need to find one more star to pair with Danny Granger. And when they do, they’ll have built a terrific supporting cast around them that should be able to compete deep into the playoffs.”
The problem is, as fans, we are impatient and it sucks to know that next year is already a waste. We’re not going to do much in the playoffs if we even get there and we’re unlikely to end up with a good pick. Hopefully within the next 2 drafts we’ll be able to pick up that second superstar. Otherwise, all these singles and doubles won’t mean shit without the grand slam at the end.
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
I like that analogy
And to further sooth my soul, I watched my Dodgers put away the Cubs with singles. It took longer (than most first innings take), but the end was still a win. We don’t have anything at the top of this team, but I’ve felt we’ve had pretty decent depth for awhile now, and I think now we’re just that much deeper.
I highly doubt I’ll ever own a Hansbrough jersey, but this project is in position to make sense eventually. When we get that guy to go alongside Danny, we’ll be immediate contenders in the East. Immediate. Until then, we’ll flounder. We’ve got one of the strangest rebuilding processes ever in that we’ll never bottom out. So it will take a little longer than the record might suggest.
we just need to get lucky and find another superstar
either by getting extremely lucky in the lottery (my guess is we finish in about the same spot next year) or having some crazy trade work out for us or drafting/trading for a guy later on who reaches superstar potential. But at least we’re in a position where if we are lucky enough to get another superstar, we will have a team around him that can help carry us far
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
The sun has risen
So with the light of day, I figure this pick as it is, and what it is, and why it is.
To look at this optimistically, as strange as it feels as I read Candide by Voltaire again, what I see is a draft I was never big on. I hated this draft. I thought it was a terrible draft from the outset, and it’s a terrible draft in hindsight. We were largely fed this “possible upside” for various players, but it was a shallow draft, a draft where even the #1 pick probably won’t go higher than 5 in 07 or 08.
There are some players that have a shot at being really good, but the issue is that they were all gone. All of them. I never much cared for DeJuan Blair. I didn’t get the fascination beyond his rebounding ability, and Indiana has rebounding ability. The only player I really felt I wanted to use a late lottery pick on was Brandon Jennings, and when he went off the board, I was scrambling. I had no backup plan for Jennings, because I didn’t like anyone that was going to be there except for Jennings.
So when Jennings went off the board, my entire draft went off the board. I didn’t really want Jrue Holiday, but I could’ve been convinced he was our guy. I didn’t really want Blair, but I could’ve been convinced he was our guy. I didn’t want Lawson, I wasn’t really excited about Maynor or Teague. I just…didn’t like this draft.
The real shock of course came when it was Tyler Hansbrough, the one guy I wanted less than any other. And it had nothing to do with his ability to perform. Unlike other guys, who are a beacon of potential, Tyler is the anti-potential. And there’s a lot of fun in the draft for pulling for potential.
It’s going to be a slow process, but we’re working with depth with higher picks in bad drafts. There will be players drafted above Hansbrough that are going to be gone before him. It’s not a fun way to build a team, but I feel I can be at peace with the pick for the long term.
100% agreed
I was higher on Blair, but other than that, this to me is exactly the right way to feel as Pacers fans today. We really have nothing to be excited about (no new potential) and I think that lack of excitement has manifested itself as anger at making the wrong move.
But yeah, the draft sucked, our pick was late in the lottery and sucked, and it simply would have been a lot more fun to make a big trade or draft a high upside guy. What we should be most upset about is that last night really just wasn’t fun as a Pacers fan.
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
Alright here we go....
First off…the draft was amazing last night, and this year marked the beginning of a long streak of me-going-to-drafts, i can guarantee that. I know I have said it a million times that I am a Carolina Fan, and i watch as much as I can of them on national TV and read up on them and blah blah blah. my mind was in a tornado last night when this pick was announced. My favorite college player getting picked by my favorite pro team, except i didnt want him necessarily. (i compared it to getting kicked in the balls but still ejaculating, you figure it out) I loved Hansbrough to death, and have probably argued pro-Hansbrough 8 million times over the last 4 years. Here’s the deal with him (IMHO). The guy is a MUCH better basketball player than he has ever been given credit for, the records he has broken (most notably all-time acc leading scorer), the touch from the line, the WAY IMPROVED mid range jumper, and even the ability to hit those crazy ass ugly shots. I used to think those were alot of luck, but u know what? After seeeing it time and time and time and time again, it is not luck, this is how he plays. That is how he shoots, and it is hard to argue with the results. But, even though it has been discussed at length, his tenacity. I literally have never seen anyone at any level goes as hard as he goes at all times. It sounds so cliche, but I really believe it this time. If you were a coach showing a player how to go hard at all times, is there one other player you could think of that you would show video of? He is the most intense focused dude ever. And last night proved it. My little cousin is a HUGE hansbrough fan, and the whole reason he wanted to go to the draft was to see him. Long story short, the 4 of us ended up getting backstage, met Hansbrough and Roy Williams, and actually took NBA photos with them during their photo shoot. I have never in my life met somoene so just intense. 10 minutes prior we were hanging with Steph and Dell Curry and his family, and Steph was one of the most chill, likable personable “celebrities” I ever met. Real Easy going. Tyler was a whole different story. He was not mean or being a dick by any means, he just really had that look in his eye like he wanted to box me out and be the first one in the picture.
I wanted Jennings, I know everyone wanted Holliday when he fell, and I thought Blair would be the pick. We got Hansbrough. He wont slack off, but is that good enough? I think we will be impressed by him, I really do. Not saying he will be an all-star, and i know we REALLY need some talent. But I think Bird has something coming, and Hansbrough will be staying. For now though, we have to welcome him with open arms, and enjoy watching him every day. As for becoming an OKC fan, for whoever wrote that before, last year my second team was portland, this year it is OKC. When I was in vegas 2 weeks ago, i put 10 bucks for me and my friend on OKC to win it all at 250 to 1 lol. And i also put 10 on indiana at 45-1. When it comes down to it, i dont know how mad I am at the pick, I think Bird will take risks when he has to, but do u necessarily have to go all in when its not really a big pot?
Larry Bird should care what I think
Because drafting Hansbrough did nothing to make me want to go to a Pacers game.
Drafting Lawson would have.
Simple as that.
A Modest Suggestion
Virtually every pick in this draft is fraught with question marks. Why don’t we just
give Bird the benefit of the doubt temporarily and see how it all turns out?
As a parallel, the notion at this point that Hibbert and Rush are pre-destined to
be nothing more than role players or second-stringers is patently absurd.
It’s way too early to pass final judgement on Bird’s picks since he took over.
Moreover, I respectfully submit that the signs look pretty positive at this moment
in time.
I am not saying that feelings of gloominess about Hansbrough might not turn
out to be appropriate. I am suggesting they are premature. For all we know,
he could be in the running for rookie of the year. He could be out of the league
in three years. The crystal ball is pretty murky.
What is the downside to keeping a positive attitude in the mean time?
by fanaticus on Jun 26, 2009 3:56 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Relax, let him play a game first.
Last season the Pacers proved they were capable of beating the best teams in the league. But they also lost to the worst teams. And how many loses did we have within 5 points? This is where Hansbrough will help us. We need his high energy intensity so we stop playing down to bad teams in the league. It also helps to have a proven winner down the stretch in close games, someone who will lift his teammates up instead of saying, here we go again (not to mention he makes free throws).
The way I look at this pick is that at the VERY LEAST, we have a solid guy off the bench with the potential to be even better. It feels like most of you though we were gonna find the next CP3 at #13. I don’t think any of the PGs still of available would be any better than Jarret Jack or TJ Ford.
Also, you all seem to think that Hansbrough has no room to improve, why is that? Because he was a four year player? Because he’ll be 24 when the season starts? Because he’s white? Because you hate UNC? Because you think he’s not athletic?
by IndyMac on Jun 26, 2009 5:46 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Hansbrough
as a life long Pacer fan, this pick does not surprise me. The organization has this mindset that every white guy could be the next Larry Bird. They continue to keep drafting hacks in the hopes they might strike gold (Scott haskin, Greg Dreiling, etc) The team got lucky with Rik Smits, and they only got 4-5 good years out of him(by the way,where is our 2nd round pick from last year?) The pacers continue their racord of 1 out of about every 6 1st round picks worth a crap( Bender=turd harrington=turd haskin=turd)
by the common sense avenger on Jun 27, 2009 2:22 AM EDT reply actions
Harrington's not bad
That is to say we’d probably still have him if we didn’t have a superior player in Danny Granger, but he’s a quality player. He’s not the kind of player I want being a focal point on my team, but I loved him as a sixth man. Any bad to come from Harrington is mostly limited to all the bad moves we made surrounding him.


























