Jim O'Brien Looks Ahead With Pacers But Without Dunleavy
Jim O'Brien was on Eddie and Kravitz this afternoon and unloaded a few interesting tidbits while discussing his thoughts on this season and how things may play out next season.
There was plenty of talk about the differences between how the season is finishing this year compared to last year at this time despite the similar records of the two teams.
While looking ahead to next year, JOB opened up about his expectations for Mike Dunleavy including a tentative timeline I have not heard before. Eddie White asked JOB how he plans for next year with the availability of Dunleavy in question.
JOB: I might be overstepping my bounds medically speaking, but I don't think there's any chance of having Michael before January 1 and that would be aggressive. So, you have to go into the season as if he's not going to be a part of the team. And if we're lucky enough to get him healthy in January or February, he's not all of a sudden going to be ready to jump into the starting lineup. He will be a guy who we will probably bring off the bench initially when he comes back. And by that point in time, I hope the combination of Brandon and Danny at the wings will be so solid that it will be difficult for Michael to break into the starting lineup and if that happens, then having a healthy Michael Dunleavy coming off the bench is pretty good.
With the talk of Dunleavy's successful surgery, I was anticipating that he'd be back in action by mid-December if not earlier. While JOB's comment stunned me initially, I'm happy to have my expectations straightened out. If Dun does return next year, sounds like my plan for this year will be in play. Considering Dun and Quisy will remain out of the picture next year, Brandon Rush should continue in the role he's been playing recently. Rush appears more comfortable playing without a sub ready to replace him.
While JOB is happy with his current players more changes are obviously needed. Considering the defensive struggles, JOB is looking for help.
JOB: We have to find a defensive mind-set that we didn't find last year and we haven't found it yet this year. That has to be something that we grow consistently over whatever tenure I'm going to be here because you'll never be a contender unless you're one of the better defensive teams in the league.Kravitz: How do you get better defensively? Is it as simple as just getting players in here who are better defensive players or can you be a reasonably good defensive team with the roster you have at your disposal now?
JOB: No.
Kravitz: (laughs) OK, I'll take that as a no.
Other items of interest discussed and the audio link:
- Teams biggest need is a next generation Jeff Foster type big or as we've been discussing around here a more traditional, athletic power forward. Troy Murphy and Roy Hibbert aren't real productive together but Murph and Foster are. The Pacers need a stout, defensive presence who is willing to knock opposing players on their butt when they try to get to the rim and can produce next to Hibbert. Likes the prospects of Rush and Granger improving the defensive production on the wings.
- TJ Ford - JOB is real happy with Ford's defensive ability and expects him to improve offensively next year. The offensive issue have to do with Ford adjusting his style of play to the offensive system of the Pacers. JOB thinks he'll get there next year and once he does his talent level will make him dangerous and likely back in a starting role.
- Jarrett Jack - Of course, he'd like to have Jack back but expects other teams to try to sign him this year. The current market may keep the price in check which would allow the Pacers to sign Jack, although it sounded like JOB was preparing for life without Jack.
- JOB didn't rule out drafting a point guard even if Jack, Ford and Diener were all under contract heading into next year. Obviously, it would depend on how the draft falls and which PG is available.
- Hopefully the next generation Jeff Foster includes a little more offensive production. After JOB was off the show, Eddie mentioned Tyler Hansbrough who would certainly fit the description, although I'd rather not like to start worrying about the Pacers using their first pick to reach on Hansbrough. If they can get him in the second round or in some deal that offers a late first rounder, then I'm all for it.
AUDIO LINK: Jim O'Brien on Eddie and Kravitz
0 recs |
4 comments
|
Comments
that all sounds very interesting
it sucks that we’ve got so much cap tied up on Dunleavy and he’s basically going to sit for a year and a half. Between him and Tinsley, that’s like what, $16 million for nothing? That’s nearly 25% of our cap, awesome.
Interesting that they like Ford’s defense. With his size, it seems like he’s always going to be a bit of a liability.
Glad to hear that they are looking for the same thing we are. And yeah, I would be very upset if we got Hansbrough with our first pick. He seems like he could have a similar career as Foster which would be fine for a 2nd rounder.
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
by psvirsky on Apr 8, 2009 6:45 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Cap Relief?
Throwing this out there: What if we could convince Dallas to take Tinsley in exchange for their first round pick (it would probably be in the 20s)?
Reasons this could work: Kidd’s enormous contract is up at the end of the season so they’ll need a PG; they are WAY over the cap now so getting a PG at 1/4th the cost is good for them; Rick Carlisle knows all about Tinsley (which may be good or bad)
Reasons this won’t work: You’d have to be pretty crazy to give up a first rounder for a guy who hasn’t played in a year; Mavs may want to just draft a PG (cost effective, but their window is closing with Dirk and Co.)
What do you think?
by TheHawk5 on Apr 8, 2009 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the toughest part about it is that there are a number of promising PG’s in this draft so they have a higher chance than normal to find one.
I don’t see it happening but I’d be really happy if it did.
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
by psvirsky on Apr 8, 2009 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great!
I’m all for any Pacers future that is without Dunleavy. I really don’t like his game and I think last year was just an example of a guy taking advantage of inflating his stats on a bad team. We should be planning our future with Dunleavy and Murphy being bench players until their contracts expire since there is no way anyone takes them from us until they’re in the last year of their contract.
by ThirtyOne on Apr 8, 2009 8:09 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs















