Pacers Heading Into A Contract Year
It's no surprise when an NBA player in the last year of his contract has a big season, suddenly increasing his value and leverage for his next deal.
But what about a whole organization playing in a contract year?
Essentially, that's what the Pacers will be doing next year, assuming Jim O'Brien and Larry Bird will work through the last year of their respective contracts without a signed extension this summer.
As Bob Kravitz points out today, Bird seems perfecly happy to go into next season with a lame-duck head coach, as well as with his future as team president unclear.
Personally, I have no concerns that JOB will coach any different. He'll still grind away every day for every game as usual. Nor do I think the team will see this as an opening to stray from the team-first agenda. From the front office to the coaching staff to the roster, that team-first agenda carries a lot of weight.
The situation does create a sense of urgency for everyone, though. With no signatures on contract extensions, the writing is on the wall that the team needs to continue to improve. Since the players actually like playing for JOB, this situation should only help with a little additional motivation to do their part. That sense of urgency flowing throughout the organization is a good thing.
My sense is that Larry Bird and Jim O'Brien are on the same page regarding the long term plan for the team and unless the team and more importantly, key players regress in their development, both will continue to see that plan through.
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Kind of funny
How the most favorable response is to extend Bird when it wasn’t a year ago everyone was ready to run him back to French Lick. What a difference a year makes.
helps to have Jermaine's contract off the books
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
What difference?
Bird hasn’t accomplished anything yet. This team wins 20 games in the western conference. No slow plodding 25 year old lottery pick that Bird picks this year will help that.
This team is fundamentally flawed to the core. No inside toughness. Nobody that can get to the rim on a regular basis, and no Deadly accurate 3pt shooters.
This is a midrange jump shooting team that cannot get defensive stops. If they are hitting shots they can beat some mid tier teams. But don’t kid yourselves into thinking this team is close to challenging for anything. Unless 38 wins and an 8th seed is something to challenge for.
" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico loose a ball in the Sun? "
they've still got some major issues, but...
Granger can both shoots 3’s and get to the rim. Rush was starting to get to the rim decently. Both the PG’s, when they’re not turning the ball over, are pretty adept at getting to the rim. No deadly accurate 3 point shooters? What does it take to be in that category? Is ranking 3rd in the league high enough? I know it’s tough to think of Murphy as a deadly 3 point shooter, but the number say he’s there. And Granger is no slouch at 34th.
You can pick on the defense all you want, but the offense was fine.
We all agree they need some serious inside toughness. Nostalgia for Artest and calls for drafting Blair are based on that.
If they are hitting their shots, they don’t just beat mid-tier teams. This year, when they hit their shots, they beat the best teams. Every single one of them.
Look, we all know they have a ways to go before contending for championships, but at the same time it looks like they might be beyond rebuilding and into the adding pieces phase.
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."












