Indy Cornrows: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Baby Boilers no more: Michigan State-Purdue Preview

Wizards 119, Pacers 117: Butler Did It At Buzzer

To say the Butler did it, is both cliché and accurate.

Caron Butler carried the Washington Wizards down the stretch and killed the little playoff momentum the Indiana Pacers had mounting. Butler hit an 18-foot jumper in the face of Danny Granger's defense, as the final buzzer blared, giving the Wizards a 119-117 win.

Wow, that one hurt. It's a familiar pain, but with the rash of losses among the teams mucking around in the Eastern Conference for the 8th playoff spot, this one keeps the Pacers near the bottom of the pile. So with a win within the Pacers grasp, the way the loss unfolded makes it sting that much more.

The Pacers had given up a season-high 34 points to Antawn Jamison through only three quarters. Jamison didn't score in the fourth quarter, but then again, he didn't need to. His running mate, Butler, pumped in 15 fourth quarter points including 12 in the final 2:01 on the Wizards final five possessions.

One stop in those final five possessions likely would've earned the Pacers a win. But they couldn't find a way to prevent one guy from scoring. Can't really complain about the game-winner, because Granger was finally guarding him and made it a difficult shot.  

I have a few questions along with the usual observations:

  • Mike Dunleavy left the game early in the first quarter and was unable to return when his sore knee flared up. No additional info yet on the extent of the pain and whether or not it is a long-term concern.
  • Brandon Rush was pushed into additional minutes with Dunleavy out and Marquis Daniels missing the game with his back issues. Rush played pretty well, chipping in 11 points, making a couple of threes.
  • Roy Hibbert on the other hand only played 3:54 in the first half and didn't return. Within two minutes, Hibbert had four points and two fouls. One foul looked like a pretty good block, but I think Hibbert's reputation precedes him these days. Why didn't Roy return to the game?  I don't want to hear about the best chance to win. The Pacers could not stop the Wiz. Maybe Roy's presence changes things on defense a little. If he fouls out, so be it.
  • Danny Granger finished with 29 seconds and came through again in the clutch, knocking down a 3-ball with 15 seconds left to tie the game at 117. Good to see the knee hold up for another game.
  • Over the past two nights, the Nets, Bucks, Bulls, Knicks, Bobcats and Raptors all lost. After beating the Magic on Friday, the Pacers had a great chance to jump up another notch in the standings. Instead they just held serve with the rest of the mess in the East.
  • So here we are, back in the valley of depression staring at LeBron James and the Cavs visiting the Fieldhouse on Tuesday. The Pacers lost to the Wizards tonight, but since they've beaten the Lakers, Celtics and Magic so far this season, the Cavs better look out.

0 recs  |  Comment 1 comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Rotations

I’m really starting to get annoyed by O’Brien’s rotations. I understand giving playing time to someone who deserves it, but don’t you also need to have some kind of stability regarding rotations at some point? Graham had a bad game against Philadelphia, yes, but now he’s at the end of the bench after one bad night even though he was a huge spark against the Knicks just two games earlier? Hibbert’s spot in the rotation is even more confusing. If he’s not going to play, why does it matter if he fouls out? In game like tonight’s, what’s it going to hurt to let him work through the fouls and see if he can make some stops when we need them? Last time I remember seeing McRoberts, he was a great energetic lift off the bench, but despite the fouls, he was given the chance to play through them (and foul out).

I just don’t understand it. I don’t know how many of this team’s “best chances to win” rotations have actually been attributed to the losses, but when Danny and Mike are the only players on the team guaranteed minutes night in and night out, does it really help the team’s psyche to know that the minutes they have one night may not be there the next if they’re not on their A-game? I’m not intending to throw O’Brien under the bus, I’m just curious about it. I’ve watched and been involved with basketball my entire life, and I simply don’t recall seeing these types of rotation concepts at this point in the season. It could just be that I’ve never really paid close attention to them until now, but it just seems unorthodox and somewhat counterproductive in my opinion.

by goodlucksaturday on Feb 9, 2009 12:26 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Indiana Pacers. Email: indycornrows@gmail.com
Start posting about the Pacers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
DANNY CANNOT SHOT
21_small
5 Worst Mistakes in Pacers History
Iphone_7-7-2009_003_small
Random trade idea
Happy_dwight_small
Season Ticket Party
Img_0441_small
We Need Defense
Small
Is Pacers Nation Worried About Danny Granger?
Colts_small
No short term solution for the Pacers
Small
More suggestions from the Peanut Gallery
Danny-granger-doves2_small
How did we get here?
Small
pacers

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

Iclogo_new_small Tom Lewis

Editor

Reggie2_330_050331_small spstevenson