Jazz 96, Pacers 87: Pacers Leave Win Safe And Sound In Utah
The Utah Jazz led the whole game, but the Indiana Pacers still should have won.
One problem, though -- they only count points if you put the ball in the basket.
If the Pacers had even an average shooting night, they would've swiped a road win in Utah and been rewarded for digging themselves out of an early hole. Instead, at winning time in the fourth quarter, the Pacers came up empty, allowing the Jazz to hang on for the win, 96-87.
The Pacers really dug in defensively, early in the fourth quarter and earned a few stops which they used to cut the lead. Then the Jazz just caught a case of the clanks, themselves, giving the Pacers ample opportunity to not only catch up on the scoreboard but even take control of the game.
Consider it opportunity lost.
With 8:36 left in the game, Brandon Rush hit a three-pointer to draw the Pacers within four at 82-78. They had been stuck trying to get over the 7-point hump most of the half, so this was a breakthrough. Momentum seemed to be fully on the Pacers' side. Warm up the get-a-way plane, a W theft appeared to be in progress.
But alas, all of that good feeling oozed away slowly and painfully until the final buzzer.
When forced to scrape up a shot in the half-court, the Pacers had trouble just passing the ball around, let alone running a set play or any semblance of motion to create a good look. We're talking game-on-the-line, two or three possession game with plenty of time and the Pacers have four guys looking at each other on the perimeter simply trying to pass it to one another.
The spacing is cramped, everyone is easily covered and a contested, off-balance shot seems like a relief. Twice, Danny Granger couldn't even get his shot to the rim as he forced it up while wearing Wesley Matthews. One shot attempt was so bad, Matthews was credited with a steal.
In fact, those two possessions were among the many empty possessions after Rush's hope-lifting three. From that point with 8:36 left in the game, the Pacers only scored two points over the next five minutes of game time.
Incredibly, the Jazz were nearly as bad on offense and couldn't put away the Pacers, which brings us to the final two minutes of the game. The Pacers were down 92-87 after T.J. Ford made a layup with 1:54 remaining in the game. Plenty of time. Plenty of options. Even after the Jazz moved up by seven points on their next possession, there was still a chance.
Of course, you've seen the score, the Pacers didn't score again. Worse, their attempts to do so, again forced the eyebrows to raise along with the blood pressure. They were playing like they DIDN'T have a chance. Dahntay Jones shots a corner three with no one in rebounding position. He's not a three-point shooter. It seemed like a desperation shot. A lot can happen in the NBA with 1:14 left.
Just not tonight.
The game stayed at seven while the Pacers continued to shoot rushed, long 3-balls. In that final 1:14 the Pacers would shoot five three-pointers, all out of rhythm and all making it easy on the Jazz to close out the game.
A few more thoughts:
- The game started with a 22-3 run by the Jazz. Utah ran off of turnovers and missed shots, used some crafty interior passing and made oodles of easy buckets. The Pacers meanwhile appeared afraid of the paint and shot jumper after jumper without moving the ball or bodies in search of a better option. By the time the dust settled on the first quarter, the Pacers were down 32-14 and they were lucky it was that close. Not sure if this was rock bottom, but with the lack of energy early and the soft play, it sure seemed like the Pacers had touched some limestone.
- The Pacers came to life in the second quarter, working the ball into the lane more and drawing some fouls (funny how that happens). The shots from the line and the field started falling and with 45 seconds left in the half, the Pacers had the ball and a chance to cut the what was once a seemingly insurmountable lead down to five. Instead, the possession ended in a turnover and before the half ended, the Jazz reeled off six quick points to push the lead back to 13. All that hard work climbing back into the game, gone in an instant.
- The Pacers started their comeback in the third quarter comeback, but again made it tough on themselves with their poor free throw shooting. At one point, Troy Murphy and T.J. Ford missed 6 of 8 freebies. The second-half free throw woes were an important part of the losing equation.
- Last year, the Pacers seemed to always have a random player from the opponent go off for a career or season-high in points. Tonight, rookie Wesley Matthews had a career-high 18 points to go along with some solid defense on Danny Granger. Also, Carlos Boozer had a season-high 35 points along with 13 rebounds.
- After a huge game on the glass in Sacramento, the Pacers only gathered three offensive rebounds compared to 14 o-rebs the Jazz utilized quite nicely.
0 recs |
9 comments
|
Comments
And after all this mediocrity
Pacers are 1.5 games out of the 8th playoff spot. Man, it would be nice to win a few games soon.
I know this probably makes me a "bad fan" but...
I’d rather the team be a one of the 5 worst teams than the 8 seed.
Look, I love the Pacers, but this team is bad. There’s no way they’re beating any of the top 4-5 teams in the East over a 7 game series.
It’d be better for the long term success if the team fully bottomed out and landed a Top 5 talent. Constantly finishing 9th and ending up with a crappy pick is killing the franchise. Sure the drafting high isn’t a sure thing, but it’s the only hope we’ve got.
Doesn't make you a bad fan
Just a fan who wants change. I understand your point, but I would like to see them in the playoffs for two reasons.
1. It would give our young guys a chance to feel what it takes to win a playoff game. I know the Pacers have been in big games before, but for those of us who have played sports, we know there is a big difference between the regular season and the post season. I would like to see them get a taste of that, even if it’s only in the first round. A playoff run might also make them hungrier in the off season.
2. I do believe they would have a chance against whoever they played. The most frustrating thing about this team is that they play to the level of their opponent. They beat the Celtics then lose to the Warriors. I don’t think they are locks to win a series against the Cavs , Magic, or Celtics; but I guarantee they give those teams a run for their money. Think the Bulls Celtics series last year.
Now the Pacers need to flip the switch and get out of this slump. I want to see the “good” team show up again!
Good points, and may I add a third
Sometimes great talent does fall to later in the lottery (ie Danny Granger).
by Rush Rules!!! on Dec 5, 2009 1:26 PM EST up reply actions
We fought, just dug to big of a hole early
Watson REALLY helped pick up the teams intensity in the second period. It seemed to light a fire under TJ. TJ picked up his energy quick after watching Earl right the ship early on…Utah has some 6’5"ish lengthy athletic guys who defend and defer shots to their teams scorers, they were all over our wing players. Brewer and Matthews inpaticular…Ide really like to see more of S Jones. We could use that athletic interior D, but no sense in me stressing about that interior D and lack of rim protection. Coach is gonna play who he’s gonna play. I’m sure their all great guys and if they fight like they did from the second quarter on that’s all I can ask…being a diehard fan can be painful sometimes!!
Really disappointed
I dunno who’s to blame…..is it in the players or in the coach?
You’re correct dude……it’s painful for a die hard fans like us.
finally I'm back
I’ve missed all the pacers games this week because I’ve been out of town. Now I’ll be able to watch, they will start winning again now haha =P
~SHaFF!~
It's gotta be the coach
The Pacers have quite a bit of talent… i mean not a top 4 in the east sort of talent. but 5 to 7 sort of talent. The inconsistent and at times heartless play is often due to coaches not owning their locker room. Apparently after the extension that players wanted to pull a Latrell Spreewell on him (choke the coach lol).
JOB sucks
He should check what are the strength of his players and work on that………you cant have a running game when you have a slow C…..you cant have an up tempo/passing game when you have an undependable PG.
there’s a mismatch of knowledge and resources….and it will definitely sucks.













