IC Cold Links: Granger Ducks Media After Loss; First Win Proves Elusive
Danny Granger, you've been called out.
Indianapolis Star columnist Bob Kravitz was not happy last night when he strolled into the Pacers locker room, after the blue and gold lost to the Nuggets 111-93, and Granger was nowhere to be found. The superstar had left the building.
He left behind him a stuttering T.J. Ford and a bunch of teammates who were confused over the team's lack of offensive firepower (the team's only weapon last season) in the first three games of the season. As Kravtiz said, this is Granger's team and he should be accountable even in the worst of times.
The photo that accompanied our game story last night is very telling. Granger's head is buried into his hands while he sits defeated, deflated and demoralized on the bench. Granger, who had 18 points and a team-high five turnovers last night, looks like crap. No need to sanitize it. He's sitting on the perimeter launching 3's and he's lost that cocky swagger that made him the NBA's Most Improved Player last year. Out of all the unknowns and uncertanties heading into this season, we knew Granger was going to an offensive powerhouse, single-handidly keeping the Pacers within striking distance. Oops.
In the middle of the third quarter, just after the Pacers cut the lead to 10 before being dismantled by the Nuggets stingy D, Mark Boyle quizzically asked cohort Slick Leonard why the Pacers' best guy at getting to the free-throw line had attempted more 3-pointers than field goals this season? The Pacers have shot 41 less free throws than opponents in three games so far, while 59 percent of Granger's attempts have been swishing clanking from beyond the arc. After Boyle posed the question to Slick, there was a slight pause before Slick responded by saying it's just the way this offense has been designed. We'll save the Jim O'Brien discussion pending tonight's game at New York.
As for now, the Lone Granger needs a good game. The Pacers need a good game. And the Pacers need a win. Check out the jump for links to recaps of last night's game.
- Box Score
- AP Story
- Mike Wells writes about the Pacers not being nearly good enough to fall behind and mount a comeback after trailing 30-13 at the end of the first quarter. Dahntay Jones continues to impress on- and off-the-court. Jones gave the media the following statement.
"It's very tough to take three losses in a row like this. We're sick and tired of losing. They have the attitude and the ball players to back that up because they know they can win. They have one of the best point guards in the league and he really takes charge. We do fight back. But we dug too deep of a hole to come out of. We are still a work in progress and we've go to continue to help each other out and find a way to get this first win. Turnovers and fouls have hurt us. We've got to get it together" -- Jones
- Bruno put together his postgame report on the loss. Interesting stat of the night that the Nuggets, since 2004-05, have the best record of any NBA team against the Pacers. Denver is 9-2 against the blue and gold in that span. Yuck. Here is also a link to a replay of Bruno's live blog to the game.
- John Oehser is pulling double-duty with an article for the Indiana Pacers Examiner about the blue and gold still struggling on the offensive side of the ball. Oehser also penned NBA.com's exclusive recap.
- Probably the best way to describe last night's game was by just showing a picture of a brick. At least that's how Eight Points, Nine Seconds saw it and we agree.
- The Denver Post writes about how the Nuggets got off to a good start to their six-game road trip with the win in Indiana.
- Our SB Nation partners over at Denver Stiffs have a recap from the Nuggets' perspective.
- Finally, if you live in the Greenwood area and want to see some positive Pacer fun, then check out Boomer who will be visiting the town on Saturday.
0 recs |
6 comments
|
Comments
I know it's only November and the team has played 3 games
but I wondering last night how Danny was going to react to it. Even though last year’s team was average they were scrappy and gave effort. Not so much this year (so far).
Danny is the leader and he should be there for everything, but I don’t blame him. I’d be pissed off too.
by Gwen on Nov 4, 2009 9:40 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
We have to win tonight
we cant score, we cant guard anybody, we show absolutely no energy while on the floor, if it doesn’t show up tonight things will really start to get ugly
If Youre not First, Youre Last
by drsuessrunner07 on Nov 4, 2009 10:32 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
That was demoralizing
Been lurking for a while but I need to add my two cents. The body language pre game gives an air of uncertainty to me. I see the players and I don’t feel like they feel confident. It is only 3 games but it sort of felt like business as usual, but losing shouldn’t be business as usual. I’m not going to panic though, I think they can and will do better, but someone needs to show a little passion.
by SpaceCowboy1984 on Nov 4, 2009 11:09 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Granger skipping media
A good sign. It means he’s embarrassed and he should be. Nothing motivates a player or team more than humiliation. Hopefully this lights a fire in Indianapolis.
by HoosierHoops14 on Nov 4, 2009 12:05 PM EST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Busy Schedule...
Havent been able to watch the last 2 games. But honestly, did we expect any differently to this point? We are a very young team, with one real scoring threat, and no defensive presence. There is alot of building to do, and untill Danny gets that help, we are going to see alot of games like this.
I seem to say it every year, but just get rid of Foster to a contender and get some late draft picks or a young talent back, he is taking up a roster spot and not giving us anything useful. Love everything you have done here Jeff, he deserves better and so do we.
by captain flitzy on Nov 4, 2009 12:24 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
granger
I’ve always had doubts about granger. He is very talented, but he’s not the type of player that leads a franchise. He is not batman, he’s more like a robin. he should be the 2nd best player on a team who actually has a superstar. Until granger learns how to create his own shot, score in a half court offense, have a good post up game(which will help him with his half court offense), and get to the rim + finish, then he will never be an all star “go to guy” when we need a big shot. He just isn’t that type of player, or atleast not yet, i’m not saying he can’t be, but right now he isn’t. He also needs to get other people involved as well, racking up some assists and make others around him better. thats the type of player we need to lead this franchise, and if we don’t have a guy like that(which right now we don’t), were not ever going to make the playoffs or win a lot of games.
I bet you anything granger scores 30+ tonight, only because its the KNICKS. watch him play a team like boston, L.A.(lakers),denver, miami, all incredibly good defensive teams, and he will struggle to score 20, and maybe even struggle to get to double digits.
When i saw him on the bench last night with his head down and all, it made me feel like he was thinking “Oh man, what have i gotten myself into, i can’t lead this team. i’m not good enough for this, i’m not good enough to score against tough defenses like this, it’s impossible!” That’s what he was playing like and that’s what he was looking like on the bench.
I’m usually a really optimistic pacers fan but this is not one of those times. sometimes you have to except the truth
by pacers4life on Nov 4, 2009 2:19 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 















