IC Cold Links: Nobody Loves A Turnover Like The Indiana Pacers
Well, at least there's still a chance to go 81-1.
After displaying an uncanny ability to dish the ball to the other team, while also allowing the Hawks to run rampant through the paint, the Pacers are now back in Indy preparing for their home opener against the Heat on Friday.
So, for now, we get to bask in the glory of the NBA season officially beginning, and the Pacers officially looking decently good, but a little bad as well. Admit it, Atlanta is a good team. The Pacers hung in there and Danny Granger, nursing a noticeably bothersome foot, led the entire league in scoring last night with 31 points in 34 minutes, which is fantastic news for my fantasy team.
Although last night was already a rollercoaster ride of emotions from me muttering mercilessly that "this is the worst ball-handling team I've ever witnessed" to "we're unstoppable", I'm still very excited about this team and its potential.
Here is a plethora of links that abound on the internet this morning that recap, analyze and then, generally, throw angered adjectives out there about the Pacers turnover-prone first night. If you didn't get your dose of action last night, this should have you covered. Check them out after the jump.
- Box Score
- Photo Gallery
- AP story
- Here is the Pacers.com postgame report, which highlights the quotes, the noteworthy and the interesting stats from the Pacers loss. I'll let Granger sum up the loss with his quote of the night.
"I don't really know how many turnovers we had tonight, but I know that's the reason that we lost this game. When you turn the ball over that many times in this league, you're not going to win. It definitely led to more possessions for the Hawks tonight. We were already having trouble stopping them, and this made the game that much harder. When the other team has the ball many more times than you, that's pretty much the recipe for a loss." -- Granger
- Bruno conducted another live blog during the game over at NBA.com.
- NBA.com is also offering exclusive game reports this year from home team writers. Here is the game report from Atlanta citing that both teams left their defense on vacation this summer.
- The Indianapolis Star had a massive spread about the re-ignition of the Pacers defense this season, so it was only fitting that Mike Wells let the blue and gold have it for somehow "losing" that defensive emphasis in the opening game. The Star also produced a story on Indy legend Jeff Teague making his debut for the Hawks last night.
- Eight Points, Nine Seconds' Jared Wade offers some actual observations and some related, possibly stupid conjectures in a splendid look at the season opener. Love the excitement over Earl Watson and Dahntay Jones being tough last night without going Artest on everybody. I'm already enjoying those two a lot.
- Examiner.com focuses on the 25 turnovers that caused the loss of many possessions for the Pacers, while 1070 The Fan's Eddie White blogs that fans need to keep in mind that it was only one game.
- For the Atlanta take on the contest, check out SB Nation's Peachtree Hoops for an interesting recap. There is also a story and a column from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
- ESPN's TrueHoop also dives into the fray by citing the Pacers poor ability to pass the ball to their teammates as a reason for the 0-1 start to the season.
- Finally, if you were like me last night, the free preview of NBA League Pass is already ruining your life. I can't flip through 20 channels fast enough. So if you feel like you still missed something from around the league, here is ESPN's Daily Dime to keep you informed.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
4th quarter
I hate to say it, but the offense seemed to go stagnant once the majority of starters re-entered the game. Earl and Dahntay seemed to lose their aggressiveness and instead began to rely too much upon Granger when he returned to the game. Coach O’Brien said he sat Ford for his defense, but I actually thought Ford played decent on-the-ball D. Ford just couldn’t make anything happen offensively for himself nor for his teammates. That’s why I thought it made sense to sit him. Let’s be honest, with slow-footers like Murphy and Hibbert playing together down low on D, they’re bound to get beat by athletic, opposing big men. Josh Smith and Horford just simply torched those guys last night with pure athleticism.
anyone else thinks earl Watson should become the starter? T.j. ford was obviously struggling last night and if it continues, watson should become the starter. He’s a little bit bigger, and defensively he helps us out a lot. He can really run an offense but the only thing i don’t like about him is he isn’t an incredible passer. 1 assist last night as their point guard? If he doesn’t get any assists with this running team then thats a problem too.
I also would like to say their is one defensive unit that works the best for our team. That is this lineup:
pg: watson
sg: jones/rush
sf: rush/jones
pf: s. jones
c: jeff foster
That lineup is our best defensivly, but it limits our offense like crazy. In my opinion next game we should try to stick granger in that lineup so we have offense and still the defense should work out as well. so it would become this
pg: watson
sg: jones/rush/ head?
sf: granger
pf: s. jones
c: jeff foster
I think that will be our best lineup, but watson needs to learn how to find his teammates and I think danny needs to learn how to rack up some assists as well. get more people involved.
Don’t you guys agree that the last lineup i posted would be the best overall defensive and offensive?
I think our best lineup..
goes
PG-Watson
SG-Rush
SF-Granger
PF-Murphy
C-Hibbert
Watsonin there especially the way Ford played last night. With the lineup you posted above, I think there are just no offensive options besides Danny. Foster is atroicus offensively, Solo we have to see more of, and I think Jones/Head/Rush are all limited offensively, but I like Rush’s potential and overall game best. Muprhy, and it is known that I don’t like him much, can at least put the ball in the basket, and HIbbert is just going to continue to grow.
by captain flitzy on Oct 29, 2009 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions
Also..
anyone else having trouble with SBNation saving their password, i have to re log-in everytime i come to the website now for the last like 3 days, its annoying as hell.
by captain flitzy on Oct 29, 2009 11:12 AM EDT reply actions
Warton should have been named starter already
Ford will lose this job to watson, just like he lost jobs to Jose Calderon, Jarrett Jack.
A) Trade Ford – not good enough to start in this system
B) FIRE Obie – flawed system, ask Dantoni
these are the same issues last year …..
simple stuff
If your PF shoots the 3-ball well then your point guard should be a penetrater .. right?
Tj is a good penetrator but is not allowed under Obie’s system … seems obvious to me why they don’t mesh.
Troy brings qualities to our team but he also bring weakness. (Namly offensive rebounds and toughness under the opposing rim)
Until at least 1 of these things happens get ready for an exciting, unpredictable season of almost making the playoffs.
I hate having to write this, I am tired poor point guard play in Indiana.
Its just one game
I agree, Ford doesn’t seem to wholly be “there.” He just looks like he’s running one offense and the other four guys on the court are running a different one. And, while we do have the benefit of looking at last year, its only one game. Lets give these guys at least a couple of games before we start asking for starting lineup changes.
On a side note, I traded Ford for Calderon straight up on NBA 2k10. While this would never happen in real life, it has worked out pretty well for me on the game. Ahh, fantasy land, I hope to never leave you.
me too
I traded TJ For Luke Ridenour and Brandon Jenning and have not lost a game yet.
9 Straight after going 5 and 7 …. I’m just saying ,virtual reality is almost reality, right?
how is 2k10?
i didnt get 2k9 but loves 2k8
by captain flitzy on Oct 29, 2009 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Its pretty good
I’m a usual purchaser of Live, but I went the other the way this year. I’m really happy with it. The in-game announcing keeps up with the action pretty well, and it also has little “next up on the schedule” things that are cool (for example, around Thanksgiving games in the schedule, it says “As your family gathers for turkey, don’t forget the matchup between the Whosits vs the Whatsits.”) Lots of little things like that make it pretty cool.
Anyway, we should have won last night!
for 6 minutes in the 4th we scored zero point and atlanta scored 10 – our backup PG was playing …. I’m just sayin
Quick Question
Does Tinsley’s contract still count against the cap for this year and next?
Check out nickandroll.blogspot.com
A little bit of research
And the Blazers turned the ball over 26 times in their opener, so we’ve got the leg up on someone.
Problem is, the Blazers won their game. Yikes.

by 


























