Bobcats 115, Pacers 108: Looking For Answers
The Indiana Pacers dumped a home overtime loss to the visiting Charlotte Bobcats on Friday night, 115-108.
I'm spending my last night in Seattle and was unable to watch this one or even listen. I was able to sneak a few peeks at updates but I'm still left with many questions I'm hoping someone can help me answer.
First of all, how come I never hear about Raymond Felton except when he's nuking the Pacers at the Fieldhouse? Last year when the Bobcats finished off the Pacers' playoff hopes in game 80, Felton played a critical role. Not only did he pitch in 18 points and 12 assists, he broke down the perimeter defense at crunch time to make plays at the hoop.
Tonight Felton put up his best game of the season with 31 points and 7 assists. Can't blame Flip Murray and a hobbled Travis Diener for this one. What happened?
The Pacers eight turnovers and eight FGs at the 8:33 mark in the second quarter. That's simply not giving your team a chance to compete, let alone win. Fortunately, there were no more turnovers before the break and the Pacers worked their way back into the game. Funny how that works.
Quisy and Danny appeared to have great games. T.J. Ford also has a nice line, once again flirting with a triple-double. Shouldn't that be enough? Was it simply too many turnovers early and late to overcome?
The only thing left to deduce is a complete defensive letdown. The Pacers battled their way back into the game, even appeared to have control late. But they couldn't get a stop. Late in the game and in overtime with the game in the balance, the Bobcats kept scoring whenever they needed to. Would one or two stops late in the fourth quarter have earned the W? Was the break down in defensive rotations or on the ball?
Final question: How in the world will the Pacers bounce back to win at Orlando on Saturday night?
Let me know if you have any answers to help me out.
Comments
Wow, you tend to give up all the close games huh?
Sorry about that.
by Norsktroll on
Nov 29, 2008 1:28 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
foul trouble...
Sure Granger had a great line with 35 and 6, but I bet if you look at minutes played it’s in the low to mid 30s. Granger is leading the league in FPG and needs to be on the court, if not for the whole game, for the majority of the time when he doesn’t need rest. Our defense in the 4th was actually fairly strong (proof the Bobcats shot 33% in the 4th), but once again, with Danny on the bench for the most the quarter, the offense became stagnant and we were outscored by that same team that shot 33% in the quarter; Murphy tried to pick up the slack but was completely broke, and both Jack and TJ has some costly turnovers down the stretch.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m the biggest D-Grange fan in the world (hell, I filled out nearly 50 ballots, every single one with Granger as one of the East forwards), but he still has to learn how to match his 4th quarter intensity and shot making ability to the level he carries through the first 3 quarters. He took three shots….THREE, in the fourth quarter and made two so his importance in late games is obvious, but it’s hard to stay out there when you got 5 fouls after the 3rd.
by Liffick on
Nov 29, 2008 3:23 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
outcoached?
I am a big fan of Jim O’Brien…but Charlotte wanted to go small, and they did. I was kinda hoping Rasho would have just parked it down there and took it at Emeka, i dont have the box score up, but i dont remember him playing much at all…I thought danny would go for at least 40 (it sounds crazy being mad someone didnt get 40, i know) but th 4ht quarter he did disappear again like liffick said. Orlando was beatable last time..the real question is, what the hell do we do about the Lakers!??!
by captain flitzy on
Nov 29, 2008 4:28 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs









